Assessment of the efficacy of a novel adhesive haemostat using real world, case series data collection

Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ijso.2023.100690
M. Grosheva , M. Liese , T. Menovsky , R. Rasschaert , D. Galun , N. Maric , P.D. Hayes , I. van Herzeele
{"title":"Assessment of the efficacy of a novel adhesive haemostat using real world, case series data collection","authors":"M. Grosheva ,&nbsp;M. Liese ,&nbsp;T. Menovsky ,&nbsp;R. Rasschaert ,&nbsp;D. Galun ,&nbsp;N. Maric ,&nbsp;P.D. Hayes ,&nbsp;I. van Herzeele","doi":"10.1016/j.ijso.2023.100690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Post-operative haemorrhage can lead to significant complications and even mortality. These utilise scarce healthcare resources and increase hospital costs, as well as negatively impacting on patient's quality of life. Haemostats that exhibit additional adhesive properties can reduce the rate of bleeding complications. Standard gelatin sponges have been used safely in surgery for over 75 years but have almost no adhesive properties. This article reports the performance of a novel adhesive gelatin patch in human surgery for the first time.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A CE-marked gelatin foam patch (TenaTac®, Selentus Science, UK) has been created through a physical modification of the sponge surface, avoiding the need for the addition of blood-derived components or additional chemicals to stimulate adhesion. Real-world, post-approval clinical evaluations of the device were undertaken, and a structured data form was utilised to collect information on the device's performance during these procedures.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 63 evaluations were undertaken by 40 surgeons in 13 countries, covering 29 different surgical procedures. When assessing the adherence of TenaTac, 83 % (48/58) of the surgeons assessed the adhesion as very good or excellent. Both “haemostatic effect” and “time to haemostasis” achieved median scores of 4/5 (IQR 4–5), which equated to “very good” on the questionnaire. When surgeons were asked to compare their experience with TenaTac against their usual haemostat, 91.7 % (55/60) rated it as good, very good or excellent. When surgeons were asked if they would recommend the use of TenaTac, 96.5 % (55/57) of the surgeons responded positively to this question.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Real world evaluation of the novel adhesive patch, TenaTac, has confirmed that it exhibits very good adhesive and haemostatic qualities and could be considered for use by a wide variety of surgical specialities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405857223001031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Post-operative haemorrhage can lead to significant complications and even mortality. These utilise scarce healthcare resources and increase hospital costs, as well as negatively impacting on patient's quality of life. Haemostats that exhibit additional adhesive properties can reduce the rate of bleeding complications. Standard gelatin sponges have been used safely in surgery for over 75 years but have almost no adhesive properties. This article reports the performance of a novel adhesive gelatin patch in human surgery for the first time.

Methods

A CE-marked gelatin foam patch (TenaTac®, Selentus Science, UK) has been created through a physical modification of the sponge surface, avoiding the need for the addition of blood-derived components or additional chemicals to stimulate adhesion. Real-world, post-approval clinical evaluations of the device were undertaken, and a structured data form was utilised to collect information on the device's performance during these procedures.

Results

In total, 63 evaluations were undertaken by 40 surgeons in 13 countries, covering 29 different surgical procedures. When assessing the adherence of TenaTac, 83 % (48/58) of the surgeons assessed the adhesion as very good or excellent. Both “haemostatic effect” and “time to haemostasis” achieved median scores of 4/5 (IQR 4–5), which equated to “very good” on the questionnaire. When surgeons were asked to compare their experience with TenaTac against their usual haemostat, 91.7 % (55/60) rated it as good, very good or excellent. When surgeons were asked if they would recommend the use of TenaTac, 96.5 % (55/57) of the surgeons responded positively to this question.

Conclusion

Real world evaluation of the novel adhesive patch, TenaTac, has confirmed that it exhibits very good adhesive and haemostatic qualities and could be considered for use by a wide variety of surgical specialities.

分享
查看原文
使用真实世界的病例系列数据收集评估一种新型黏附止血剂的疗效
背景术后出血可导致严重并发症甚至死亡。这些措施利用了稀缺的医疗资源,增加了医院成本,并对患者的生活质量产生了负面影响。具有额外粘合性能的止血剂可以降低出血并发症的发生率。标准明胶海绵已在外科手术中安全使用超过75年,但几乎没有粘合性能。本文首次报道了一种新型明胶贴片在人体外科手术中的性能。方法通过对海绵表面进行物理改性,制作出CE标记的明胶泡沫贴片(TenaTac®,Selentus Science,UK),避免了添加血液衍生成分或其他化学物质来刺激粘附。对该设备进行了真实世界的批准后临床评估,并使用结构化数据表收集这些过程中设备性能的信息。结果来自13个国家的40名外科医生共进行了63次评估,涵盖了29种不同的外科手术。在评估TenaTac的粘附性时,83%(48/58)的外科医生认为粘附性非常好或非常好。“止血效果”和“止血时间”的中位得分均为4/5(IQR 4-5),在问卷中相当于“非常好”。当外科医生被要求将他们使用TenaTac的经验与他们常用的止血器进行比较时,91.7%(55/60)的人将其评为良好、非常好或优秀。当外科医生被问及是否会建议使用TenaTac时,96.5%(55/57)的外科医生对此问题做出了积极回应。结论对新型粘合贴片TenaTac的真实世界评估证实,它具有非常好的粘合和止血性能,可供各种外科专业使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信