Surveillance one year post focal cryotherapy for clinically significant prostate cancer using mpMRI and PIRADS v2.1: An initial experience from a prospective phase II mandatory biopsy study

IF 1.8 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jyothirmayi Velaga , Kae Jack Tay , Guanqi Hang , Yu Guang Tan , John SP Yuen , Melvin Chua , Rajan T. Gupta , Thomas J. Polascik , Nye Thane Ngo , Yan Mee Law
{"title":"Surveillance one year post focal cryotherapy for clinically significant prostate cancer using mpMRI and PIRADS v2.1: An initial experience from a prospective phase II mandatory biopsy study","authors":"Jyothirmayi Velaga ,&nbsp;Kae Jack Tay ,&nbsp;Guanqi Hang ,&nbsp;Yu Guang Tan ,&nbsp;John SP Yuen ,&nbsp;Melvin Chua ,&nbsp;Rajan T. Gupta ,&nbsp;Thomas J. Polascik ,&nbsp;Nye Thane Ngo ,&nbsp;Yan Mee Law","doi":"10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) surveillance post focal cryotherapy (FT) of prostate cancer is challenging as post treatment artefacts alter mpMRI findings. In this initial experience, we assessed diagnostic performance of mpMRI in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) after FT.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This single-centre phase II prospective clinical trial recruited 28 men with localized csPCa for FT between October 2019 and April 2021. 12-months post FT mpMRI were performed prior to biopsy and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of all mpMRI positive subjects were analysed. Chi square goodness of fit test correlated biopsy positive PIRADS3 (P3) and PIRADS4/5 lesions with histology grade group. One way ANOVA test assessed performance of ADC values in differentiating csPCa, non csPCa and benign lesions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of mpMRI were 100%, 14.28%, 53.84% and 100% for subjects with histologically proven cancer. Correlation of PIRADS v2.1 scores with histologically proven prostate cancer was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.5). Correlation of P3 lesions with non-csPCa was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.02535). Higher ADC value was associated with benign histology (adjusted odds ratio OR 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.94, 0.99) (p = 0.008). Among the malignant lesions, higher ADC value was associated with non-csPCa (adjusted OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95, 0.99) (p = 0.032).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>mpMRI is highly sensitive in detecting residual cancer. ADC values and PIRADS scores may be of value in differentiating csPCa from non-csPCa with a potential for risk stratification of men requiring re-biopsy versus non-invasive surveillance of remnant prostate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38076,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352047723000552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) surveillance post focal cryotherapy (FT) of prostate cancer is challenging as post treatment artefacts alter mpMRI findings. In this initial experience, we assessed diagnostic performance of mpMRI in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) after FT.

Materials and methods

This single-centre phase II prospective clinical trial recruited 28 men with localized csPCa for FT between October 2019 and April 2021. 12-months post FT mpMRI were performed prior to biopsy and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of all mpMRI positive subjects were analysed. Chi square goodness of fit test correlated biopsy positive PIRADS3 (P3) and PIRADS4/5 lesions with histology grade group. One way ANOVA test assessed performance of ADC values in differentiating csPCa, non csPCa and benign lesions.

Results

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of mpMRI were 100%, 14.28%, 53.84% and 100% for subjects with histologically proven cancer. Correlation of PIRADS v2.1 scores with histologically proven prostate cancer was statistically significant (p < 0.5). Correlation of P3 lesions with non-csPCa was statistically significant (p < 0.02535). Higher ADC value was associated with benign histology (adjusted odds ratio OR 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.94, 0.99) (p = 0.008). Among the malignant lesions, higher ADC value was associated with non-csPCa (adjusted OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.95, 0.99) (p = 0.032).

Conclusion

mpMRI is highly sensitive in detecting residual cancer. ADC values and PIRADS scores may be of value in differentiating csPCa from non-csPCa with a potential for risk stratification of men requiring re-biopsy versus non-invasive surveillance of remnant prostate.

应用mpMRI和PIRADS v2.1对具有临床意义的前列腺癌局灶性冷冻治疗一年后的监测:一项前瞻性II期强制性活检研究的初步经验
目的前列腺癌局灶性冷冻治疗(FT)后的多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)监测具有挑战性,因为治疗后的伪影改变了mpMRI的表现。在这项初步研究中,我们评估了mpMRI在FT后检测临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的诊断性能。材料和方法这项单中心II期前瞻性临床试验在2019年10月至2021年4月期间招募了28名患有局限性csPCa的FT男性。在活检前进行FT后12个月的mpMRI检查,分析所有mpMRI阳性受试者的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。卡方拟合优度检验将活检阳性PIRADS3 (P3)和PIRADS4/5病变与组织学分级组相关。单因素方差分析评估ADC值在鉴别csPCa、非csPCa和良性病变中的表现。结果mpMRI对组织学证实的肿瘤的敏感性、特异性、PPV和NPV分别为100%、14.28%、53.84%和100%。PIRADS v2.1评分与组织学证实的前列腺癌的相关性有统计学意义(p <0.5)。P3病变与非cspca的相关性有统计学意义(p <0.02535)。较高的ADC值与良性组织学相关(校正优势比OR 0.97, 95%可信区间:0.94,0.99)(p = 0.008)。在恶性病变中,较高的ADC值与非cspca相关(校正OR: 0.97;95% CI: 0.95, 0.99) (p = 0.032)。结论mpmri对残余癌的检测灵敏度高。ADC值和PIRADS评分可能对区分csPCa和非csPCa具有价值,并可能对需要重新活检的男性进行风险分层,而不是对残余前列腺进行无创监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Radiology Open
European Journal of Radiology Open Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信