Roselyne Boulieu , Antoine Tourlonias , Magali Larger
{"title":"Comparison of the use of 6-thioguanine riboside versus 6-thioguanine as calibration standard to monitor 6-thioguanine nucleotides in red blood cells","authors":"Roselyne Boulieu , Antoine Tourlonias , Magali Larger","doi":"10.1016/j.jpbao.2023.100007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The analytical methods reported to evaluate 6-Thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGNs) level in red blood cells (RBC) are based on the conversion of 6-TGNs to 6-Thioguanine (6-TG) using 6-thioguanine as calibration standard.</p><p>Using the LC-DAD method previously reported by Dervieux and Boulieu in 1998 to determine 6-TGNs, we evaluated the use of 6-Thioguanine Riboside (6-TGR) as standard instead of the base 6-TG for the monitoring of 6-TGNs in RBC from patients with IBD.</p><p>Our results show that 6-TGN values measured in RBC from 30 patients were significantly (p < 0,00001) higher when 6-TGR was used as calibration standard compared to 6-TG. The difference observed may be explained by the presence of ribose in the chemical structure of 6-TGR contrary to 6-TG. This difference in 6-TGN values was also observed in external quality control assay using 6-TGR versus 6-TG calibration standard.</p><p>The use of the nucleoside 6-TGR as calibrator constitutes a better reflection of the chemical reaction which occurs in RBC compared to 6-TG. This preliminary observation suggests that the choice of calibration standard to monitor 6-TGNs may have a significant impact on the values measured in patients and laboratory should be aware of this potential pitfall.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100822,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis Open","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949771X23000075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The analytical methods reported to evaluate 6-Thioguanine nucleotides (6-TGNs) level in red blood cells (RBC) are based on the conversion of 6-TGNs to 6-Thioguanine (6-TG) using 6-thioguanine as calibration standard.
Using the LC-DAD method previously reported by Dervieux and Boulieu in 1998 to determine 6-TGNs, we evaluated the use of 6-Thioguanine Riboside (6-TGR) as standard instead of the base 6-TG for the monitoring of 6-TGNs in RBC from patients with IBD.
Our results show that 6-TGN values measured in RBC from 30 patients were significantly (p < 0,00001) higher when 6-TGR was used as calibration standard compared to 6-TG. The difference observed may be explained by the presence of ribose in the chemical structure of 6-TGR contrary to 6-TG. This difference in 6-TGN values was also observed in external quality control assay using 6-TGR versus 6-TG calibration standard.
The use of the nucleoside 6-TGR as calibrator constitutes a better reflection of the chemical reaction which occurs in RBC compared to 6-TG. This preliminary observation suggests that the choice of calibration standard to monitor 6-TGNs may have a significant impact on the values measured in patients and laboratory should be aware of this potential pitfall.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
