Soil property recovery from incomplete in-situ geotechnical test data using a hybrid deep generative framework

IF 6.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Weihang Chen , Jianwen Ding , Tengfei Wang , David P. Connolly , Xing Wan
{"title":"Soil property recovery from incomplete in-situ geotechnical test data using a hybrid deep generative framework","authors":"Weihang Chen ,&nbsp;Jianwen Ding ,&nbsp;Tengfei Wang ,&nbsp;David P. Connolly ,&nbsp;Xing Wan","doi":"10.1016/j.enggeo.2023.107332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Geotechnical testing serves to assess the strength and stiffness of in-situ soils, for purposes such as informing foundation design. Despite its importance, time constraints, financial considerations, and site-specific limitations often restrict testing to isolated locations with limited horizontal resolution. Therefore, this paper presents a novel hybrid generative deep learning model designed to approximate soil properties across sites based on sparsely sampled geotechnical data. The model uses geological subsurface samples derived from random field theory as ‘a priori’ data for a conditional variational auto-encoder (CVAE) model. By doing so, it attempts to map the relationship between in-situ data and the corresponding spatial coordinates, as well as the inherent link between in-situ data and spatial distribution. Then, in the post-processing phase, a Kriging model interpolates minor discrepancies between the measured and predicted values. To demonstrate its practical application, this paper focuses on cone penetration testing (CPT) as the geotechnical test method. The model's development is thoroughly discussed, followed by the validation using in-situ data and an analysis conducted with synthetic data. It is shown that the uncertainty associated with CVAE-Kriging depends upon both the distance from the sample point and the site's inherent complexity. The proposed methodology not only offers refined subsurface modeling but also expands the understanding of uncertainty in geotechnical testing. Practically, it can assist geotechnical engineers with insights during the survey phase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11567,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Geology","volume":"326 ","pages":"Article 107332"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013795223003502","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geotechnical testing serves to assess the strength and stiffness of in-situ soils, for purposes such as informing foundation design. Despite its importance, time constraints, financial considerations, and site-specific limitations often restrict testing to isolated locations with limited horizontal resolution. Therefore, this paper presents a novel hybrid generative deep learning model designed to approximate soil properties across sites based on sparsely sampled geotechnical data. The model uses geological subsurface samples derived from random field theory as ‘a priori’ data for a conditional variational auto-encoder (CVAE) model. By doing so, it attempts to map the relationship between in-situ data and the corresponding spatial coordinates, as well as the inherent link between in-situ data and spatial distribution. Then, in the post-processing phase, a Kriging model interpolates minor discrepancies between the measured and predicted values. To demonstrate its practical application, this paper focuses on cone penetration testing (CPT) as the geotechnical test method. The model's development is thoroughly discussed, followed by the validation using in-situ data and an analysis conducted with synthetic data. It is shown that the uncertainty associated with CVAE-Kriging depends upon both the distance from the sample point and the site's inherent complexity. The proposed methodology not only offers refined subsurface modeling but also expands the understanding of uncertainty in geotechnical testing. Practically, it can assist geotechnical engineers with insights during the survey phase.

利用混合深层生成框架从不完整的原位岩土试验数据中恢复土壤特性
岩土工程测试用于评估原位土壤的强度和刚度,目的是为基础设计提供信息。尽管它很重要,但时间限制、财务考虑和特定地点的限制往往将测试限制在水平分辨率有限的孤立位置。因此,本文提出了一种新的混合生成深度学习模型,旨在基于稀疏采样的岩土数据来近似不同场地的土壤特性。该模型使用从随机场论导出的地质地下样本作为条件变分自动编码器(CVAE)模型的“先验”数据。通过这样做,它试图绘制原位数据与相应空间坐标之间的关系,以及原位数据与空间分布之间的内在联系。然后,在后处理阶段,克里格模型对测量值和预测值之间的微小差异进行插值。为了证明其实际应用,本文重点介绍了圆锥贯入试验(CPT)作为一种岩土工程试验方法。对该模型的发展进行了深入讨论,随后使用现场数据进行了验证,并使用合成数据进行了分析。结果表明,与CVAE克里格相关的不确定性取决于与采样点的距离和场地的固有复杂性。所提出的方法不仅提供了精细的地下建模,而且扩展了对岩土工程测试中不确定性的理解。实际上,它可以帮助岩土工程师在勘察阶段获得见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Geology
Engineering Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
12.20%
发文量
327
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Engineering Geology, an international interdisciplinary journal, serves as a bridge between earth sciences and engineering, focusing on geological and geotechnical engineering. It welcomes studies with relevance to engineering, environmental concerns, and safety, catering to engineering geologists with backgrounds in geology or civil/mining engineering. Topics include applied geomorphology, structural geology, geophysics, geochemistry, environmental geology, hydrogeology, land use planning, natural hazards, remote sensing, soil and rock mechanics, and applied geotechnical engineering. The journal provides a platform for research at the intersection of geology and engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信