Serum biomarkers in healthy, injured, and osteoarthritic knees: a critical review

Julie P. Burland , Emily R. Hunt , Christian Lattermann
{"title":"Serum biomarkers in healthy, injured, and osteoarthritic knees: a critical review","authors":"Julie P. Burland ,&nbsp;Emily R. Hunt ,&nbsp;Christian Lattermann","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjp.2022.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Osteoarthritis (OA) can have deleterious effects on the joint. Many targeted strategies have been proposed to identify OA onset and progression prior to presentation of clinical symptoms and radiographic changes. Emerging research has focused on the utility of certain biochemical markers (biomarkers) as potential precursors of OA. Serum biomarkers have been widely studied across disease spectrums for their ability to classify the following characteristics: cartilage damage during early preradiographic stages, disease activity, severity or burden of disease, prognosis prediction, and response to certain treatment approaches. These classifications may be useful for understanding the evaluation and the qualification of biomarkers related to OA.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The purpose of this critical review is to summarize and evaluate the existing serum biomarkers currently proposed for the identification and evaluation of osteoarthritis onset and progression in 3 populations: healthy-, anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed-, and osteoarthritic knees using the BIPED (burden of disease, investigative, prognostic, efficacy of intervention and diagnostic) classification.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Articles that reported on serum biomarkers in individuals with healthy, anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed and osteoarthritic knees were collected from peer-reviewed sources available on Medline (January 1, 2000 through March 31, 2020). Search terms included the following: serum AND biomarker AND knee AND osteoarthritis AND healthy AND (“anterior cruciate ligament” OR “anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction” OR “ACLR”). Articles were limited to studies in humans, written in English, and full text accessible. All serum biomarkers evaluated in the gathered articles were classified according to the BIPED classification.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 164 unique serum biomarkers were identified across healthy individuals, 18 reported on patients after knee injury (commonly anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction), 71 reported on patients with diagnosed osteoarthritis and 5 reported mixed populations. Biomarkers studied most frequently include serum COMP, interleukin-6, C2C, CPII, hyaluronic acid, tumor necrosis factor- alpha, c-reactive protein, MMP-3, high sensitivity-CRP, IL-8 and IL-1B, CS846, YKL-40, and C1,2C.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results highlight large variations in how these biomarkers respond to different stimuli across multiple populations. The most frequently studied biomarkers were those categorized under the BIPED criteria as <em>diagnostic, burden of disease</em> and <em>prognostic</em> biomarkers. More robust and longitudinal research on serum biomarkers needs to be conducted in these 3 populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100760,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cartilage & Joint Preservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667254522000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) can have deleterious effects on the joint. Many targeted strategies have been proposed to identify OA onset and progression prior to presentation of clinical symptoms and radiographic changes. Emerging research has focused on the utility of certain biochemical markers (biomarkers) as potential precursors of OA. Serum biomarkers have been widely studied across disease spectrums for their ability to classify the following characteristics: cartilage damage during early preradiographic stages, disease activity, severity or burden of disease, prognosis prediction, and response to certain treatment approaches. These classifications may be useful for understanding the evaluation and the qualification of biomarkers related to OA.

Objectives

The purpose of this critical review is to summarize and evaluate the existing serum biomarkers currently proposed for the identification and evaluation of osteoarthritis onset and progression in 3 populations: healthy-, anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed-, and osteoarthritic knees using the BIPED (burden of disease, investigative, prognostic, efficacy of intervention and diagnostic) classification.

Methods

Articles that reported on serum biomarkers in individuals with healthy, anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed and osteoarthritic knees were collected from peer-reviewed sources available on Medline (January 1, 2000 through March 31, 2020). Search terms included the following: serum AND biomarker AND knee AND osteoarthritis AND healthy AND (“anterior cruciate ligament” OR “anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction” OR “ACLR”). Articles were limited to studies in humans, written in English, and full text accessible. All serum biomarkers evaluated in the gathered articles were classified according to the BIPED classification.

Results

A total of 164 unique serum biomarkers were identified across healthy individuals, 18 reported on patients after knee injury (commonly anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction), 71 reported on patients with diagnosed osteoarthritis and 5 reported mixed populations. Biomarkers studied most frequently include serum COMP, interleukin-6, C2C, CPII, hyaluronic acid, tumor necrosis factor- alpha, c-reactive protein, MMP-3, high sensitivity-CRP, IL-8 and IL-1B, CS846, YKL-40, and C1,2C.

Conclusions

The results highlight large variations in how these biomarkers respond to different stimuli across multiple populations. The most frequently studied biomarkers were those categorized under the BIPED criteria as diagnostic, burden of disease and prognostic biomarkers. More robust and longitudinal research on serum biomarkers needs to be conducted in these 3 populations.

血清生物标志物在健康,受伤和骨关节炎膝关节:一个重要的回顾
引言骨关节炎(OA)会对关节产生有害影响。已经提出了许多有针对性的策略来在出现临床症状和放射学变化之前识别OA的发作和进展。新兴的研究集中在某些生化标志物(生物标志物)作为OA的潜在前体的效用上。血清生物标志物因其对以下特征进行分类的能力而在疾病谱中得到了广泛研究:早期放射前阶段的软骨损伤、疾病活动、疾病的严重程度或负担、预后预测以及对某些治疗方法的反应。这些分类可能有助于理解与OA相关的生物标志物的评估和鉴定。目的本综述的目的是总结和评估目前用于识别和评估3个人群中骨关节炎发作和进展的现有血清生物标志物:健康的、重建的前交叉韧带的、,以及使用BIPED(疾病负担、调查、预后、干预效果和诊断)分类的骨关节炎膝关节。方法从Medline(2000年1月1日至2020年3月31日)上的同行评审来源收集关于健康、前交叉韧带重建和膝关节骨性关节炎患者血清生物标志物的文章。搜索词包括以下内容:血清和生物标志物与膝关节和骨关节炎与健康的和(“前交叉韧带”或“前十字韧带重建”或“ACLR”)。文章仅限于人类研究,以英语撰写,全文可查阅。根据BIPED分类对收集的文章中评估的所有血清生物标志物进行分类。结果在健康个体中共鉴定出164种独特的血清生物标志物,其中18种报告于膝关节损伤(通常为前交叉韧带重建)后的患者,71种报告于诊断为骨关节炎的患者,5种报告为混合人群。研究最频繁的生物标志物包括血清COMP、白细胞介素-6、C2C、CPII、透明质酸、肿瘤坏死因子-α、c-反应蛋白、MMP-3、高敏CRP、IL-8和IL-1B、CS846、YKL-40和C1,2C。结论这些生物标志物对不同刺激的反应在多个人群中存在很大差异。最常研究的生物标志物是根据BIPED标准分类为诊断、疾病负担和预后生物标志物的生物标志。需要在这3个群体中对血清生物标志物进行更有力的纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信