An empirical assessment on the leveraging evidence of economic complexity under environmental kuznets curve hypothesis: A comparative analysis between Nordic and Non-Nordic European countries

Jules-Eric Tchapchet Tchouto
{"title":"An empirical assessment on the leveraging evidence of economic complexity under environmental kuznets curve hypothesis: A comparative analysis between Nordic and Non-Nordic European countries","authors":"Jules-Eric Tchapchet Tchouto","doi":"10.1016/j.igd.2023.100074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study empirically investigates the existence or not of Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis in Nordic and Non-Nordic European countries, with carbon dioxide emissions (and ecological footprint for robustness tests) as proxy of environmental quality. The data are spanning from the years 2005–2019 and covering 22 countries. Using the Gross National Income per capita as measure of economic growth, we show on one hand as first contribution that initially, EKC hypothesis is significantly not valid in the full sample. Interestingly, when taking the Economic Complexity into account, our results show evidence of a consistent leveraging effect that changes the U-Shaped into an inverted U-Shaped structure. As second contribution, a step forward into our results with quantile analysis shows evidence of a significant countries’ threshold effect only in median and upper quantiles where the EKC hypothesis is confirmed. On the other hand, a first disaggregation of the sample into Nordic and Non-Nordic European countries, show no evidence of EKC structure among the two sub-groups. Nevertheless, a further disaggregation based on Euro zone currency criteria, show as third contribution that Euro zone countries are characterized by a U-Shaped structure whether Nordic or Non-Nordic, contrary to an inverted U-Shaped structure for Non-Nordic countries belonging to Non-Euro zone. Policy implications are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100674,"journal":{"name":"Innovation and Green Development","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation and Green Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949753123000425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This study empirically investigates the existence or not of Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis in Nordic and Non-Nordic European countries, with carbon dioxide emissions (and ecological footprint for robustness tests) as proxy of environmental quality. The data are spanning from the years 2005–2019 and covering 22 countries. Using the Gross National Income per capita as measure of economic growth, we show on one hand as first contribution that initially, EKC hypothesis is significantly not valid in the full sample. Interestingly, when taking the Economic Complexity into account, our results show evidence of a consistent leveraging effect that changes the U-Shaped into an inverted U-Shaped structure. As second contribution, a step forward into our results with quantile analysis shows evidence of a significant countries’ threshold effect only in median and upper quantiles where the EKC hypothesis is confirmed. On the other hand, a first disaggregation of the sample into Nordic and Non-Nordic European countries, show no evidence of EKC structure among the two sub-groups. Nevertheless, a further disaggregation based on Euro zone currency criteria, show as third contribution that Euro zone countries are characterized by a U-Shaped structure whether Nordic or Non-Nordic, contrary to an inverted U-Shaped structure for Non-Nordic countries belonging to Non-Euro zone. Policy implications are discussed.

环境库兹涅茨曲线假设下经济复杂性杠杆证据的实证评估——北欧与非北欧国家的比较分析
本研究以二氧化碳排放量(和生态足迹为稳健性检验)作为环境质量的代表,实证研究了北欧和非北欧国家环境库兹涅茨曲线(EKC)假设的存在与否。这些数据涵盖了2005年至2019年的22个国家。使用人均国民总收入作为经济增长的衡量标准,我们一方面作为第一贡献表明,最初,EKC假设在整个样本中显着不有效。有趣的是,当考虑到经济复杂性时,我们的结果显示了一个一致的杠杆效应,将u型结构转变为倒u型结构。作为第二个贡献,通过分位数分析向前迈进一步,我们的结果显示,只有在EKC假设得到证实的中位数和上分位数中,才有显著的国家阈值效应的证据。另一方面,将样本分解为北欧和非北欧欧洲国家,没有证据表明这两个亚组之间存在EKC结构。然而,基于欧元区货币标准的进一步分解显示,作为第三个贡献,欧元区国家的特征是u型结构,无论是北欧还是非北欧,与属于非欧元区的非北欧国家的倒u型结构相反。讨论了政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信