Accuracy of preoperative liver volumetry in living donor liver transplantation—A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mika S. Buijk , Marcel Dijkshoorn , Roy S. Dwarkasing , Alicia C. Chorley , Robert C. Minnee , Markus U. Boehnert
{"title":"Accuracy of preoperative liver volumetry in living donor liver transplantation—A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Mika S. Buijk ,&nbsp;Marcel Dijkshoorn ,&nbsp;Roy S. Dwarkasing ,&nbsp;Alicia C. Chorley ,&nbsp;Robert C. Minnee ,&nbsp;Markus U. Boehnert","doi":"10.1016/j.liver.2023.100150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Liver volume measurement plays a critical role in the clinical success of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). CT liver volumetry is used for volumetric assessment of the donor hepatectomy. However, the degree of accuracy of the preoperative predicted volumetric measurements remains unclear.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This systematic review will assess the accuracy of CT liver volumetry.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>A systematic literature search was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the CT based liver volumetry. To assess the difference between the left and right liver lobe the ratio between preoperative estimated graft volume (EGV) and actual graft weight (AGW) was calculated. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the EGV to the AGW of the left and right lobe with automated and manual CT volume prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria and 1336 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The EGV of the right liver is overestimated with a mean of 4.01% and 2.99% for automated and manual volumetry respectively. The left lobe is overestimated with 6.28% and 14.41% for automated and manual volumetry respectively. For a right lobe liver graft automated volume prediction showed a mean difference of 43.9 g (95% confidence interval (CI): 21.21–66.54, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001) between EGV and AGW. For manual volume prediction this was 34.0 g (95% CI: 11.85–56.11, <em>p</em> = 0.003). For a left lobe with automated volume prediction the mean difference was 46.0 g (95% CI: 20.91–71.09, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001) between EGV and AGW. For manual volume prediction this was 39.6 g (95% CI: 8.40–70.74, <em>p</em> = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The volumes of the right and left liver lobe seem to be overestimated with automated and manual CT volume prediction. Considering the larger estimation error in the prediction of the left liver lobe, special attention should be paid to the volume when performing a LDLT with a left liver lobe to prevent small for size syndrome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666967623000132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Liver volume measurement plays a critical role in the clinical success of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). CT liver volumetry is used for volumetric assessment of the donor hepatectomy. However, the degree of accuracy of the preoperative predicted volumetric measurements remains unclear.

Purpose

This systematic review will assess the accuracy of CT liver volumetry.

Materials and Methods

A systematic literature search was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of the CT based liver volumetry. To assess the difference between the left and right liver lobe the ratio between preoperative estimated graft volume (EGV) and actual graft weight (AGW) was calculated. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the EGV to the AGW of the left and right lobe with automated and manual CT volume prediction.

Results

Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria and 1336 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The EGV of the right liver is overestimated with a mean of 4.01% and 2.99% for automated and manual volumetry respectively. The left lobe is overestimated with 6.28% and 14.41% for automated and manual volumetry respectively. For a right lobe liver graft automated volume prediction showed a mean difference of 43.9 g (95% confidence interval (CI): 21.21–66.54, p<0.001) between EGV and AGW. For manual volume prediction this was 34.0 g (95% CI: 11.85–56.11, p = 0.003). For a left lobe with automated volume prediction the mean difference was 46.0 g (95% CI: 20.91–71.09, p<0.001) between EGV and AGW. For manual volume prediction this was 39.6 g (95% CI: 8.40–70.74, p = 0.01).

Conclusion

The volumes of the right and left liver lobe seem to be overestimated with automated and manual CT volume prediction. Considering the larger estimation error in the prediction of the left liver lobe, special attention should be paid to the volume when performing a LDLT with a left liver lobe to prevent small for size syndrome.

活体肝移植术前肝容量测定的准确性——系统回顾和荟萃分析
肝体积测量在活体肝移植(LDLT)的临床成功中起着至关重要的作用。CT肝体积测量用于供体肝切除术的体积评估。然而,术前预测体积测量的准确度仍不清楚。目的评价CT肝容量测量的准确性。材料与方法通过系统的文献检索,评价基于CT的肝脏体积测量的准确性。计算术前估计移植物体积(EGV)与实际移植物重量(AGW)之比,以评估左右肝叶的差异。进行meta分析,比较自动和手动CT容积预测的左右叶EGV和AGW。结果31项研究符合纳入标准,1336例患者被纳入meta分析。自动容积法和手动容积法对右肝EGV的平均高估分别为4.01%和2.99%。自动容积法和手动容积法分别高估了左叶的6.28%和14.41%。对于右肝叶移植物,自动体积预测显示EGV和AGW之间的平均差异为43.9 g(95%可信区间(CI): 21.21-66.54, p<0.001)。人工体积预测为34.0 g (95% CI: 11.85-56.11, p = 0.003)。对于自动容积预测的左叶,EGV和AGW之间的平均差异为46.0 g (95% CI: 20.91-71.09, p<0.001)。人工体积预测为39.6 g (95% CI: 8.40-70.74, p = 0.01)。结论CT自动和人工预测的肝左、右叶容积存在高估的现象。考虑到左肝叶预测的估计误差较大,左肝叶行LDLT时应特别注意容积,防止小体积综合征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信