When in doubt, lay it out: Over vs. under-accommodation in human-robot interaction

IF 1.7 2区 文学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Chad Edwards , Autumn Edwards , Varun Rijhwani
{"title":"When in doubt, lay it out: Over vs. under-accommodation in human-robot interaction","authors":"Chad Edwards ,&nbsp;Autumn Edwards ,&nbsp;Varun Rijhwani","doi":"10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What happens when a social robot attempts to accommodate its communicative behavior towards the human interlocutor? The present experiment seeks to expand understanding of how people evaluate social robots when <em>they</em> (the social robots) engage in cases of over- and under-accommodation during interactions. Additionally, the current study partially replicates and extends earlier work examining nonaccommodation. Results indicated that some relationships between the stereotype content model (warmth and competence) were mediated by perceived accommodation for the evaluation outcomes. Moreover, the social robot in the overaccommodative communication condition was evaluated more positively than the social robot in the underaccommodative communication condition. As such, it is better for a social robot to be considered overaccommodative than underaccommodative.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51592,"journal":{"name":"Language Sciences","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 101561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0388000123000268","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

What happens when a social robot attempts to accommodate its communicative behavior towards the human interlocutor? The present experiment seeks to expand understanding of how people evaluate social robots when they (the social robots) engage in cases of over- and under-accommodation during interactions. Additionally, the current study partially replicates and extends earlier work examining nonaccommodation. Results indicated that some relationships between the stereotype content model (warmth and competence) were mediated by perceived accommodation for the evaluation outcomes. Moreover, the social robot in the overaccommodative communication condition was evaluated more positively than the social robot in the underaccommodative communication condition. As such, it is better for a social robot to be considered overaccommodative than underaccommodative.

如果有疑问,那就把它摆出来:人机交互的过度适应与不足适应
当一个社交机器人试图适应它对人类对话者的交流行为时会发生什么?本实验旨在扩大人们对社交机器人在互动过程中过度适应和适应不足的情况下如何评估的理解。此外,目前的研究部分复制和扩展了早期研究非适应性的工作。结果表明,刻板印象内容模型(温暖和胜任力)之间的关系通过对评价结果的感知适应来中介。此外,在过度调节条件下的社交机器人比在不足调节条件下的社交机器人得到了更积极的评价。因此,对于一个社交机器人来说,被认为是过度适应比适应不足要好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language Sciences
Language Sciences Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Language Sciences is a forum for debate, conducted so as to be of interest to the widest possible audience, on conceptual and theoretical issues in the various branches of general linguistics. The journal is also concerned with bringing to linguists attention current thinking about language within disciplines other than linguistics itself; relevant contributions from anthropologists, philosophers, psychologists and sociologists, among others, will be warmly received. In addition, the Editor is particularly keen to encourage the submission of essays on topics in the history and philosophy of language studies, and review articles discussing the import of significant recent works on language and linguistics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信