Associations between postural orientation errors in patients undergoing rehabilitation for ACL reconstruction and future patient-reported outcomes: An explorative study

Anna Cronström , Eva Ageberg , Erika Zeraidi , Julia Larsson , Jenny Nae
{"title":"Associations between postural orientation errors in patients undergoing rehabilitation for ACL reconstruction and future patient-reported outcomes: An explorative study","authors":"Anna Cronström ,&nbsp;Eva Ageberg ,&nbsp;Erika Zeraidi ,&nbsp;Julia Larsson ,&nbsp;Jenny Nae","doi":"10.1016/j.jsampl.2023.100039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate associations between postural orientation errors (POEs) in patients undergoing rehabilitation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) at 2-year follow-up.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty-three participants (mean (SD) 27 (6.5) years, 24 women), (mean (range) 7 (4–10) months post ACLR) were included. At baseline, all participants were visually assessed for POEs using a validated test battery. The POE subscales Activities of Daily Living and Sport were used in the analysis. At 2-years, the following PROMs were collected: Global knee function, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, ACL Quality of Life (QoL), Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (K-SES), and ACL Return-to-Sport after Injury scale.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-one participants answered the questionnaires at 2 years (7 women and 14 men). Worse baseline POE Sport was associated with worse scores on K-SES (r<sub>s</sub> ​= ​–0.435, p ​≤ ​0.049) and ACL-QoL (r<sub>s</sub> ​= ​−0.467 to −0.576, p ​≤ ​0.038) at follow-up. No statistically significant associations were observed between POEs and the other PROMs.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Postural orientation during the rehabilitation phase may be important for future knee self-efficacy and knee-related QoL after ACLR. Given the small population and low response rate, this result needs to be confirmed in future research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74029,"journal":{"name":"JSAMS plus","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSAMS plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772696723000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate associations between postural orientation errors (POEs) in patients undergoing rehabilitation for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) at 2-year follow-up.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Methods

Fifty-three participants (mean (SD) 27 (6.5) years, 24 women), (mean (range) 7 (4–10) months post ACLR) were included. At baseline, all participants were visually assessed for POEs using a validated test battery. The POE subscales Activities of Daily Living and Sport were used in the analysis. At 2-years, the following PROMs were collected: Global knee function, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, ACL Quality of Life (QoL), Knee Self-Efficacy Scale (K-SES), and ACL Return-to-Sport after Injury scale.

Results

Twenty-one participants answered the questionnaires at 2 years (7 women and 14 men). Worse baseline POE Sport was associated with worse scores on K-SES (rs ​= ​–0.435, p ​≤ ​0.049) and ACL-QoL (rs ​= ​−0.467 to −0.576, p ​≤ ​0.038) at follow-up. No statistically significant associations were observed between POEs and the other PROMs.

Conclusion

Postural orientation during the rehabilitation phase may be important for future knee self-efficacy and knee-related QoL after ACLR. Given the small population and low response rate, this result needs to be confirmed in future research.

一项探索性研究:前交叉韧带重建康复患者的姿势定向错误与未来患者报告的结果之间的关系
目的探讨前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)患者2年随访中体位取向误差(POEs)与患者报告预后(PROMs)的关系。前瞻性队列研究。方法纳入53例患者,平均(SD) 27(6.5)岁,女性24例,平均(范围)术后7(4-10)个月。在基线,所有参与者使用经过验证的测试电池进行POEs视觉评估。使用POE的日常生活活动和运动分量表进行分析。在2年时,收集以下PROMs:膝关节整体功能、膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分、ACL生活质量(QoL)、膝关节自我效能量表(K-SES)和ACL损伤后恢复运动量表。结果21名参与者在2年时完成了问卷调查,其中女性7人,男性14人。基线POE运动较差与随访时K-SES评分较差(rs = -0.435, p≤0.049)和ACL-QoL评分较差(rs = - 0.467至- 0.576,p≤0.038)相关。POEs与其他prom之间无统计学意义的关联。结论康复阶段的体位取向可能对ACLR术后膝关节自我效能感和膝关节相关生活质量有重要影响。由于研究对象较少,应答率较低,这一结果需要在未来的研究中进一步证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信