L’acquisition de l’expertise ou l’abandon progressif du renforcement des processus génériques

IF 0.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
G. Froger , C. Blättler , N. Bonnardel
{"title":"L’acquisition de l’expertise ou l’abandon progressif du renforcement des processus génériques","authors":"G. Froger ,&nbsp;C. Blättler ,&nbsp;N. Bonnardel","doi":"10.1016/j.psfr.2023.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The repetition of multitasking episodes leads to a reinforcement of the generic and specific processes solicited, resulting in an improvement of the performance in these same tasks, up to a final state which corresponds to expertise. However, the expert's performance is attributed to processes considered as “domain specific”. Thus, the reinforcement of generic processes developed during the pathway to expertise seems to have disappeared. What happened to the reinforced generic processes? This review articulates several discrete theoretical fields: that of expertise acquisition (Logan, 1988), acquired expertise (Gobet &amp; Simon, 1996), dual-task situations (Pashler, 1994) and executive functions (Miyake et al., 2000). We show that it is possible to envisage reinforcement of executive functions throughout the process of developing expertise and we propose that this reinforcement ceases when expertise is acquired.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44717,"journal":{"name":"Psychologie Francaise","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychologie Francaise","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0033298423000043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The repetition of multitasking episodes leads to a reinforcement of the generic and specific processes solicited, resulting in an improvement of the performance in these same tasks, up to a final state which corresponds to expertise. However, the expert's performance is attributed to processes considered as “domain specific”. Thus, the reinforcement of generic processes developed during the pathway to expertise seems to have disappeared. What happened to the reinforced generic processes? This review articulates several discrete theoretical fields: that of expertise acquisition (Logan, 1988), acquired expertise (Gobet & Simon, 1996), dual-task situations (Pashler, 1994) and executive functions (Miyake et al., 2000). We show that it is possible to envisage reinforcement of executive functions throughout the process of developing expertise and we propose that this reinforcement ceases when expertise is acquired.

获得专门知识或逐步放弃加强一般过程
多任务处理的重复会导致所要求的一般和特定过程的强化,从而导致在这些相同任务中的表现得到改善,直到达到与专业知识相对应的最终状态。然而,专家的表现归因于被认为是“特定领域”的过程。因此,在通往专业知识的道路上发展起来的通用过程的强化似乎已经消失了。强化的泛型过程发生了什么?这篇综述阐明了几个离散的理论领域:专业知识获取(Logan, 1988),获得的专业知识(Gobet &Simon, 1996),双任务情境(Pashler, 1994)和执行功能(Miyake et al., 2000)。我们表明,在发展专门知识的整个过程中,设想执行功能的加强是可能的,我们建议这种加强在获得专门知识时停止。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychologie Francaise
Psychologie Francaise PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Psychologie française is the official organ of Société française de psychologie. It publishes original articles, most of the time within thematic issues. Considered as a reference publication, which covers all fields of psychology, its contents are used for tuition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信