The differences between cerebral dominance patterns in the speed and accuracy of information processing among university students

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
S.H. Ibrahim , O.O. Mangoud
{"title":"The differences between cerebral dominance patterns in the speed and accuracy of information processing among university students","authors":"S.H. Ibrahim , O.O. Mangoud","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2022.100835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"73 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S116290882200086X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
大学生大脑优势模式在信息加工速度和准确性上的差异
大脑支配地位的研究一直受到研究者的高度重视;然而,研究其与信息处理的关系的研究却很少。目的本研究旨在揭示大脑优势模式(左脑优势、右脑优势、整合平行脑优势)在信息处理速度和准确性方面的差异。方法以182名大学生为样本(平均年龄±标准差,19.92±2.76岁;年龄18-24岁;68名男性,114名女性)。对参与者进行了人类信息处理调查。每个受试者接受两项基本认知任务(Stroop任务和Eriksen flanker任务)。每个任务包括两个实验条件:第一,反映信息自动处理的一致条件;第二,反映信息处理受控的不协调条件。结果研究结果表明,两种大脑支配模式在信息处理的速度和准确性方面没有差异。结论尽管大脑优势与信息处理之间的关系并不显著,但我们需要在其他样本和其他实验条件下进行更多的研究来检验这种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信