LAM professionals' roles and attitudes to user participation in Norway and Sweden

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Jamie Johnston , Isto Huvila , Henrik Jochumsen , Mahmood Khosrowjerdi , Anna Mierzecka , Ágústa Pálsdóttir
{"title":"LAM professionals' roles and attitudes to user participation in Norway and Sweden","authors":"Jamie Johnston ,&nbsp;Isto Huvila ,&nbsp;Henrik Jochumsen ,&nbsp;Mahmood Khosrowjerdi ,&nbsp;Anna Mierzecka ,&nbsp;Ágústa Pálsdóttir","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recent studies provide insights into library, archive and museum (LAM) professionals' attitudes toward user participation, yet they do not address how the diversity of roles LAM professionals assume may influence their attitudes toward participation. The reported findings based on a questionnaire to LAM professionals in Norway and Sweden indicate that user participation is viewed differently depending on how the professionals perceive their roles in relation to those of other professions. Analysis of the underlying relationships between the questionnaire respondents' perceptions and attitudes identifies three subject positions with associated interpretative repertoires: power sharing, outsourcing and engaging experts. Additional analysis using a four-quadrant model of user engagement that differentiates between bottom-up and top-down approaches and between areas of organizational activity suggests that the respondents primarily see themselves as experts within their respective fields and have yet to relinquish this role in favor of a more bottom-up approach to user participation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"45 3","pages":"Article 101249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library & Information Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818823000257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies provide insights into library, archive and museum (LAM) professionals' attitudes toward user participation, yet they do not address how the diversity of roles LAM professionals assume may influence their attitudes toward participation. The reported findings based on a questionnaire to LAM professionals in Norway and Sweden indicate that user participation is viewed differently depending on how the professionals perceive their roles in relation to those of other professions. Analysis of the underlying relationships between the questionnaire respondents' perceptions and attitudes identifies three subject positions with associated interpretative repertoires: power sharing, outsourcing and engaging experts. Additional analysis using a four-quadrant model of user engagement that differentiates between bottom-up and top-down approaches and between areas of organizational activity suggests that the respondents primarily see themselves as experts within their respective fields and have yet to relinquish this role in favor of a more bottom-up approach to user participation.

挪威和瑞典LAM专业人员对用户参与的角色和态度
最近的研究提供了图书馆、档案和博物馆(LAM)专业人员对用户参与的态度的见解,但他们没有解决LAM专业人员所承担的角色的多样性如何影响他们对参与的态度。根据对挪威和瑞典的LAM专业人员进行的问卷调查所报告的结果表明,根据专业人员如何看待他们与其他专业人员的关系,对用户参与的看法有所不同。通过分析问卷调查对象的看法和态度之间的潜在关系,可以确定三种具有相关解释能力的主体立场:权力分享、外包和聘请专家。使用用户参与的四象限模型(区分自下而上和自上而下方法以及组织活动领域)进行的额外分析表明,受访者主要将自己视为各自领域的专家,并且尚未放弃这一角色,以支持更自下而上的用户参与方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Library & Information Science Research
Library & Information Science Research INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Library & Information Science Research, a cross-disciplinary and refereed journal, focuses on the research process in library and information science as well as research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance. All papers are subject to a double-blind reviewing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信