Bi-objective optimization models for mitigating traffic congestion in urban road networks

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Haritha Chellapilla , R. Sivanandan , Bhargava Rama Chilukuri , Chandrasekharan Rajendran
{"title":"Bi-objective optimization models for mitigating traffic congestion in urban road networks","authors":"Haritha Chellapilla ,&nbsp;R. Sivanandan ,&nbsp;Bhargava Rama Chilukuri ,&nbsp;Chandrasekharan Rajendran","doi":"10.1016/j.jtte.2021.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Traffic congestion in road transportation networks is a persistent problem in major metropolitan cities around the world. In this context, this paper deals with exploiting underutilized road capacities in a network to lower the congestion on overutilized links while simultaneously satisfying the system optimal flow assignment for sustainable transportation. Four congestion mitigation strategies are identified based on deviation and relative deviation of link volume from the corresponding capacity. Consequently, four bi-objective mathematical programming optimal flow distribution (OFD) models are proposed. The case study results demonstrate that all the proposed models improve system performance and reduce congestion on high volume links by shifting flows to low volume-to-capacity links compared to UE and SO models. Among the models, the system optimality with minimal sum and maximum absolute relative-deviation models (SO-SAR and SO-MAR) showed superior results for different performance measures. The SO-SAR model yielded 50% and 30% fewer links at higher link utilization factors than UE and SO models, respectively. Also, it showed more than 25% improvement in path travel times compared to UE travel time for about 100 paths and resulted in the least network congestion index of 1.04 compared to the other OFD and UE models. Conversely, the SO-MAR model yielded the least total distance and total system travel time, resulting in lower fuel consumption and emissions, thus contributing to sustainability. The proposed models contribute towards efficient transportation infrastructure management and will be of interest to transportation planners and traffic managers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756423000041","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Traffic congestion in road transportation networks is a persistent problem in major metropolitan cities around the world. In this context, this paper deals with exploiting underutilized road capacities in a network to lower the congestion on overutilized links while simultaneously satisfying the system optimal flow assignment for sustainable transportation. Four congestion mitigation strategies are identified based on deviation and relative deviation of link volume from the corresponding capacity. Consequently, four bi-objective mathematical programming optimal flow distribution (OFD) models are proposed. The case study results demonstrate that all the proposed models improve system performance and reduce congestion on high volume links by shifting flows to low volume-to-capacity links compared to UE and SO models. Among the models, the system optimality with minimal sum and maximum absolute relative-deviation models (SO-SAR and SO-MAR) showed superior results for different performance measures. The SO-SAR model yielded 50% and 30% fewer links at higher link utilization factors than UE and SO models, respectively. Also, it showed more than 25% improvement in path travel times compared to UE travel time for about 100 paths and resulted in the least network congestion index of 1.04 compared to the other OFD and UE models. Conversely, the SO-MAR model yielded the least total distance and total system travel time, resulting in lower fuel consumption and emissions, thus contributing to sustainability. The proposed models contribute towards efficient transportation infrastructure management and will be of interest to transportation planners and traffic managers.

缓解城市道路网交通拥堵的双目标优化模型
道路交通网络中的交通拥堵是世界各地主要大都市的一个持续问题。在这种背景下,本文讨论了利用网络中未充分利用的道路容量来降低过度利用路段的拥堵,同时满足可持续交通的系统最优流量分配。基于链路容量与相应容量的偏差和相对偏差,确定了四种拥塞缓解策略。因此,提出了四个双目标数学规划最优流量分配(OFD)模型。案例研究结果表明,与UE和SO模型相比,所有提出的模型都通过将流转移到低容量链路来提高系统性能,并减少高容量链路上的拥塞。在这些模型中,具有最小和和和最大绝对相对偏差的系统最优性模型(SO-SAR和SO-MAR)在不同的性能度量下显示出优越的结果。SO-SAR模型在较高的链路利用率下产生的链路分别比UE和SO模型少50%和30%。此外,在大约100条路径中,它显示出与UE行进时间相比,路径行进时间改善了25%以上,并且与其他OFD和UE模型相比,网络拥塞指数最低,为1.04。相反,SO-MAR模型产生的总距离和总系统行程时间最少,从而降低了燃料消耗和排放,从而有助于可持续性。所提出的模型有助于有效的交通基础设施管理,并将引起交通规划者和交通管理者的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.30%
发文量
402
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) serves as a renowned academic platform facilitating the exchange and exploration of innovative ideas in the realm of transportation. Our journal aims to foster theoretical and experimental research in transportation and welcomes the submission of exceptional peer-reviewed papers on engineering, planning, management, and information technology. We are dedicated to expediting the peer review process and ensuring timely publication of top-notch research in this field.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信