Resolving a nearly 90-year-old enigma: The rare Fagus chienii is conspecific with F. hayatae based on molecular and morphological evidence

IF 4.6 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Dan-Qi Li , Lu Jiang , Hua Liang , Da-Hai Zhu , Deng-Mei Fan , Yi-Xuan Kou , Yi Yang , Zhi-Yong Zhang
{"title":"Resolving a nearly 90-year-old enigma: The rare Fagus chienii is conspecific with F. hayatae based on molecular and morphological evidence","authors":"Dan-Qi Li ,&nbsp;Lu Jiang ,&nbsp;Hua Liang ,&nbsp;Da-Hai Zhu ,&nbsp;Deng-Mei Fan ,&nbsp;Yi-Xuan Kou ,&nbsp;Yi Yang ,&nbsp;Zhi-Yong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.pld.2023.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Taxonomic uncertainties of rare species often hinder effective prioritization for conservation. One such taxonomic uncertainty is the 90-year-old enigma of <em>Fagus</em> <em>chienii</em>. <em>F. chienii</em> was previously only known from the type specimens collected in 1935 in Pingwu County of Sichuan Province, China, and has long been thought to be on the verge of extinction. However, morphological similarities to closely related <em>Fagus</em> species have led many to question the taxonomic status of <em>F. chienii</em>. To clarify this taxonomic uncertainty, we used the newly collected samples to reconstruct a molecular phylogeny of Chinese <em>Fagus</em> species against the phylogenetic backbone of the whole genus using seven nuclear genes. In addition, we examined nine morphological characters to determine whether <em>F. chienii</em> is morphologically distinct from its putatively closest relatives (<em>F. hayatae</em>, <em>F</em><em>.</em> <em>longipetiolata</em>, and <em>F</em><em>.</em> <em>lucida</em>). Both morphological and phylogenetic analyses indicated that <em>F. chienii</em> is conspecific with <em>F. hayatae</em>. We recommended that <em>F. chienii</em> should not be treated as a separate species in conservation management. However, conservation strategies such as <em>in situ</em> protection and <em>ex situ</em> germplasm preservation should be adopted to prevent the peculiar “<em>F. chienii</em>” population from extinction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20224,"journal":{"name":"Plant Diversity","volume":"45 5","pages":"Pages 544-551"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468265923000203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Taxonomic uncertainties of rare species often hinder effective prioritization for conservation. One such taxonomic uncertainty is the 90-year-old enigma of Fagus chienii. F. chienii was previously only known from the type specimens collected in 1935 in Pingwu County of Sichuan Province, China, and has long been thought to be on the verge of extinction. However, morphological similarities to closely related Fagus species have led many to question the taxonomic status of F. chienii. To clarify this taxonomic uncertainty, we used the newly collected samples to reconstruct a molecular phylogeny of Chinese Fagus species against the phylogenetic backbone of the whole genus using seven nuclear genes. In addition, we examined nine morphological characters to determine whether F. chienii is morphologically distinct from its putatively closest relatives (F. hayatae, F. longipetiolata, and F. lucida). Both morphological and phylogenetic analyses indicated that F. chienii is conspecific with F. hayatae. We recommended that F. chienii should not be treated as a separate species in conservation management. However, conservation strategies such as in situ protection and ex situ germplasm preservation should be adopted to prevent the peculiar “F. chienii” population from extinction.

解开一个近90年的谜团:根据分子和形态学证据,罕见的奇氏Fagus chienii与哈氏F.hayatae是同种的
稀有物种在分类学上的不确定性往往阻碍了保护的有效优先级。其中一个分类学上的不确定性是有90年历史的奇氏法格斯之谜。F.chienii以前只从1935年在中国四川省平武县采集的模式标本中被发现,长期以来一直被认为处于灭绝的边缘。然而,与亲缘关系密切的Fagus物种在形态学上的相似性导致许多人质疑F.chienii的分类地位。为了澄清这种分类上的不确定性,我们使用新收集的样本,利用七个核基因,根据整个属的系统发育主干,重建了中国Fagus种的分子系统发育。此外,我们检查了9个形态特征,以确定F.chienii在形态上是否与其假定的近亲(F.hayatae、F.longipetiolata和F.lucida)不同。形态学和系统发育分析表明,灰蝶与哈氏灰蝶是同一物种。我们建议在保护管理中不应将灰蝶视为一个单独的物种。然而,应采取原位保护和迁地种质保存等保护策略,以防止特有的“F.chienii”种群灭绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Diversity
Plant Diversity Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1863
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Plant Diversity (formerly Plant Diversity and Resources) is an international plant science journal that publishes substantial original research and review papers that advance our understanding of the past and current distribution of plants, contribute to the development of more phylogenetically accurate taxonomic classifications, present new findings on or insights into evolutionary processes and mechanisms that are of interest to the community of plant systematic and evolutionary biologists. While the focus of the journal is on biodiversity, ecology and evolution of East Asian flora, it is not limited to these topics. Applied evolutionary issues, such as climate change and conservation biology, are welcome, especially if they address conceptual problems. Theoretical papers are equally welcome. Preference is given to concise, clearly written papers focusing on precisely framed questions or hypotheses. Papers that are purely descriptive have a low chance of acceptance. Fields covered by the journal include: plant systematics and taxonomy- evolutionary developmental biology- reproductive biology- phylo- and biogeography- evolutionary ecology- population biology- conservation biology- palaeobotany- molecular evolution- comparative and evolutionary genomics- physiology- biochemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信