Comparison of the Results and Applicability of Different Seismic Microzoning Methods for Territories in Platform Conditions with Weak Seismicity

IF 0.3 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
A. G. Bugaevskiy
{"title":"Comparison of the Results and Applicability of Different Seismic Microzoning Methods for Territories in Platform Conditions with Weak Seismicity","authors":"A. G. Bugaevskiy","doi":"10.3103/S0747923921060025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article compares the results and estimation of the application conditions of seismic microzoning (SMZ) by numerical and instrumental methods for sites characterized by relatively small horizontal heterogeneity of the structure and properties of the soil strata. The results of applying the instrumental method for recording microseisms (Nakamura method) and calculation methods the of seismic stiffness and spectral transfer functions for SMZ of Oktyabrsky Island in Kaliningrad, Kaliningrad oblast were investigated. It is shown that the used SMZ methods yielded consistent results, differing mainly in the degree of detail and completeness of information. The results of the instrumental method for recording microseisms are characterized by the greatest detail and contain the most complete real, rather than model-calculated, frequency response of the expected seismic shaking. It is concluded that for weakly seismic areas with layered soil strata rather similar in structure to a horizontally homogeneous model, the choice of SMZ methods should be substantiated by the degree of importance of structures projected on the territory and, therefore, by the necessary amount of information on the frequency response of the expected vibrations and required site distribution details in seismic intensity increments.</p>","PeriodicalId":45174,"journal":{"name":"Seismic Instruments","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismic Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0747923921060025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article compares the results and estimation of the application conditions of seismic microzoning (SMZ) by numerical and instrumental methods for sites characterized by relatively small horizontal heterogeneity of the structure and properties of the soil strata. The results of applying the instrumental method for recording microseisms (Nakamura method) and calculation methods the of seismic stiffness and spectral transfer functions for SMZ of Oktyabrsky Island in Kaliningrad, Kaliningrad oblast were investigated. It is shown that the used SMZ methods yielded consistent results, differing mainly in the degree of detail and completeness of information. The results of the instrumental method for recording microseisms are characterized by the greatest detail and contain the most complete real, rather than model-calculated, frequency response of the expected seismic shaking. It is concluded that for weakly seismic areas with layered soil strata rather similar in structure to a horizontally homogeneous model, the choice of SMZ methods should be substantiated by the degree of importance of structures projected on the territory and, therefore, by the necessary amount of information on the frequency response of the expected vibrations and required site distribution details in seismic intensity increments.

弱地震台地条件下不同地震区划方法的结果及适用性比较
本文比较了在土层结构和性质水平非均质性较小的场地,用数值方法和仪器方法对地震微区划(SMZ)应用条件的结果和估计。采用仪器微震记录方法(Nakamura法)和计算方法对加里宁格勒州Oktyabrsky岛SMZ的地震刚度和谱传递函数进行了研究。结果表明,所使用的SMZ方法得到了一致的结果,主要差异在于信息的详细程度和完整性。记录微震的仪器方法的结果具有最详细的特点,并包含最完整的真实频率响应,而不是模型计算的预期地震震动。结论是,对于具有与水平均匀模型结构相当相似的层状土壤地层的弱地震地区,SMZ方法的选择应由投射在该领土上的结构的重要程度来证实,因此,应由有关预期振动的频率响应的必要信息量和地震烈度增量中所需的场地分布细节来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seismic Instruments
Seismic Instruments GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
自引率
44.40%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Seismic Instruments is a journal devoted to the description of geophysical instruments used in seismic research. In addition to covering the actual instruments for registering seismic waves, substantial room is devoted to solving instrumental-methodological problems of geophysical monitoring, applying various methods that are used to search for earthquake precursors, to studying earthquake nucleation processes and to monitoring natural and technogenous processes. The description of the construction, working elements, and technical characteristics of the instruments, as well as some results of implementation of the instruments and interpretation of the results are given. Attention is paid to seismic monitoring data and earthquake catalog quality Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信