Efficacy of tibial transverse transport combined with platelet-rich plasma versus platelet-rich plasma alone in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis

Ke Chen , Yikang Yu , Jialu Shu , Binbin Zhang , Gang Wang , Bin Wu
{"title":"Efficacy of tibial transverse transport combined with platelet-rich plasma versus platelet-rich plasma alone in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: A meta-analysis","authors":"Ke Chen ,&nbsp;Yikang Yu ,&nbsp;Jialu Shu ,&nbsp;Binbin Zhang ,&nbsp;Gang Wang ,&nbsp;Bin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjprs.2023.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Diabetic foot ulcers (DBFU) are one of the main complications of diabetes. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment is a commonly used treatment option. Tibial transverse transport (TTT) also has a therapeutic effect on DBFU. Some studies have found that the TTT combined with PRP (TTT&amp;PRP) has a significant effect on DBFU.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical Literature, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases were used to find literature on the treatment of DBFUs using the TTT and PRP treatment according to the inclusion criteria. The specific inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) research type: clinical controlled trials, including retrospective cohort and randomized controlled studies; (2) diagnosis of DBFUs that does not include a definitively diagnosed traumatic ulcer; (3) original materials of Chinese and English literature published in full text. The exclusion criteria are: (1) the research group was not defined or grouped; (2) nonrandomized controlled trials, non-cohort studies, non-case-control studies, retrospective studies, and case reports; (3) repetitive research and animal experimentation; (4) ulcers caused by other diseases; (5) conservative treatment or no use of invasive treatment methods. Review Manager software (version 5.3) was used to conduct a meta-analysis of the included results.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>The literature included 6 randomized controlled studies, including 508 patients, 254 patients in the PRP treatment group, and 254 patients in the TTT&amp;PRP group. The meta-analysis results showed that in terms of treatment efficacy, the TTT&amp;PRP combined treatment group had a higher efficacy than the PRP group. After treatment, the TTT&amp;PRP group had better treatment effects in psychological function, physiological function, and social function compared to the PRP group. After treatment, the TTT&amp;PRP group showed a significant increase in serum epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) levels compared to the PRP group. In terms of wound healing after treatment, the TTT&amp;PRP group performed better than the PRP group in terms of postoperative wound reduction rate, bacterial clearance rate, granulation tissue coverage rate, and granulation tissue growth thickness.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>TTT combined with PRP was more effective than PRP alone in treating DBFUs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":65600,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 145-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096691123000511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diabetic foot ulcers (DBFU) are one of the main complications of diabetes. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment is a commonly used treatment option. Tibial transverse transport (TTT) also has a therapeutic effect on DBFU. Some studies have found that the TTT combined with PRP (TTT&PRP) has a significant effect on DBFU.

Methods

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical Literature, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases were used to find literature on the treatment of DBFUs using the TTT and PRP treatment according to the inclusion criteria. The specific inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) research type: clinical controlled trials, including retrospective cohort and randomized controlled studies; (2) diagnosis of DBFUs that does not include a definitively diagnosed traumatic ulcer; (3) original materials of Chinese and English literature published in full text. The exclusion criteria are: (1) the research group was not defined or grouped; (2) nonrandomized controlled trials, non-cohort studies, non-case-control studies, retrospective studies, and case reports; (3) repetitive research and animal experimentation; (4) ulcers caused by other diseases; (5) conservative treatment or no use of invasive treatment methods. Review Manager software (version 5.3) was used to conduct a meta-analysis of the included results.

Result

The literature included 6 randomized controlled studies, including 508 patients, 254 patients in the PRP treatment group, and 254 patients in the TTT&PRP group. The meta-analysis results showed that in terms of treatment efficacy, the TTT&PRP combined treatment group had a higher efficacy than the PRP group. After treatment, the TTT&PRP group had better treatment effects in psychological function, physiological function, and social function compared to the PRP group. After treatment, the TTT&PRP group showed a significant increase in serum epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) levels compared to the PRP group. In terms of wound healing after treatment, the TTT&PRP group performed better than the PRP group in terms of postoperative wound reduction rate, bacterial clearance rate, granulation tissue coverage rate, and granulation tissue growth thickness.

Conclusion

TTT combined with PRP was more effective than PRP alone in treating DBFUs.

胫骨横向转运联合富血小板血浆与单用富血小板血浆治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效:荟萃分析
糖尿病足溃疡是糖尿病的主要并发症之一。富含血小板血浆(PRP)治疗是一种常用的治疗方案。胫骨横向运输(TTT)对DBFU也有治疗作用。一些研究发现TTT联合PRP(TTT&;PRP)对DBFU有显著影响。方法根据纳入标准,使用PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、EMBASE、中国生物医学文献、CNKI、VIP和万方数据库查找TTT和PRP治疗DBFUs的文献。具体纳入标准如下:(1)研究类型:临床对照试验,包括回顾性队列和随机对照研究;(2) 诊断DBFUs,不包括明确诊断的创伤性溃疡;(3) 全文出版的中英文文学原始资料。排除标准为:(1)未对研究组进行定义或分组;(2) 非随机对照试验、非队列研究、非病例对照研究、回顾性研究和病例报告;(3) 重复研究和动物实验;(4) 其他疾病引起的溃疡;(5) 保守治疗或不使用侵入性治疗方法。Review Manager软件(5.3版)用于对纳入的结果进行荟萃分析。结果文献包括6项随机对照研究,包括508例患者、254例PRP治疗组患者和254例TTT&;PRP组。荟萃分析结果显示,在治疗效果方面,TTT&;PRP联合治疗组的疗效高于PRP组。治疗后TTT&;PRP组在心理功能、生理功能和社会功能方面均优于PRP组。治疗后TTT&;与PRP组相比,PRP组的血清表皮生长因子(EGF)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF)和血小板衍生生长因子(PDGF)水平显著升高。在治疗后的伤口愈合方面;PRP组在术后伤口缩小率、细菌清除率、肉芽组织覆盖率和肉芽组织生长厚度方面优于PRP组。结论TTT联合PRP治疗DBFUs疗效优于单纯PRP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Facial Plastic Surgery, Pathology and Medical Technology, Transplantation
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
55 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信