A decision aid for the port placement problem in robot-assisted hysterectomy

Q3 Medicine
Mohammad R. Maddah , Jean-Marc Classe , Isabelle Jaffre , Keith A. Watson , Katherine S. Lin , Damien Chablat , Cedric Dumas , Caroline G.L. Cao
{"title":"A decision aid for the port placement problem in robot-assisted hysterectomy","authors":"Mohammad R. Maddah ,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Classe ,&nbsp;Isabelle Jaffre ,&nbsp;Keith A. Watson ,&nbsp;Katherine S. Lin ,&nbsp;Damien Chablat ,&nbsp;Cedric Dumas ,&nbsp;Caroline G.L. Cao","doi":"10.1016/j.lers.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, proper port positioning ensures that surgical tools have adequate access to the surgical site and avoids mid-surgery collisions of robotic arms. To date, several guidelines have been proposed for more accurate port placement. However, challenges remain due to variations in patient morphology, anatomy, and, in particular, organ displacement due to insufflation in certain laparoscopic procedures. The objective of this study was to design and develop a decision aid for optimal port placement in robot-assisted hysterectomy that accounts for patient variability and organ displacement due to insufflation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Three components were constructed: a robot model, a patient-specific model, and an optimization algorithm. The three components were integrated, and the system was verified using four different patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy. Once verified, two expert surgeons were asked to evaluate the decision aid for face and construct validity. A usability test was conducted using a torso phantom with target organs located in three different locations. Two expert surgeons performed a simulated hysterectomy task with and without the decision aid to evaluate performance and satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The optimization algorithm was sensitive to individual differences in anatomy in the four patients. Expert surgeons successfully established face and construct validity. Usability test results showed a 28%–40% reduction in time to task completion with the optimized ports compared to expert-determined port locations without using the decision aid.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The decision aid, based on an individualized patient-specific model, robot model, and optimization algorithm, was shown to be effective at addressing the challenges of displaced organs due to insufflation in robot-assisted hysterectomy. The face and construct validity of the decision aid was established by expert surgeons, while efficiency gains in task performance were demonstrated experimentally.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":32893,"journal":{"name":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468900923000233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

In robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery, proper port positioning ensures that surgical tools have adequate access to the surgical site and avoids mid-surgery collisions of robotic arms. To date, several guidelines have been proposed for more accurate port placement. However, challenges remain due to variations in patient morphology, anatomy, and, in particular, organ displacement due to insufflation in certain laparoscopic procedures. The objective of this study was to design and develop a decision aid for optimal port placement in robot-assisted hysterectomy that accounts for patient variability and organ displacement due to insufflation.

Methods

Three components were constructed: a robot model, a patient-specific model, and an optimization algorithm. The three components were integrated, and the system was verified using four different patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy. Once verified, two expert surgeons were asked to evaluate the decision aid for face and construct validity. A usability test was conducted using a torso phantom with target organs located in three different locations. Two expert surgeons performed a simulated hysterectomy task with and without the decision aid to evaluate performance and satisfaction.

Results

The optimization algorithm was sensitive to individual differences in anatomy in the four patients. Expert surgeons successfully established face and construct validity. Usability test results showed a 28%–40% reduction in time to task completion with the optimized ports compared to expert-determined port locations without using the decision aid.

Conclusions

The decision aid, based on an individualized patient-specific model, robot model, and optimization algorithm, was shown to be effective at addressing the challenges of displaced organs due to insufflation in robot-assisted hysterectomy. The face and construct validity of the decision aid was established by expert surgeons, while efficiency gains in task performance were demonstrated experimentally.

机器人辅助子宫切除术中端口放置问题的辅助决策
目的在机器人辅助微创手术中,正确的端口定位确保手术工具能够充分进入手术部位,避免机械臂在手术中期发生碰撞。到目前为止,已经提出了一些更准确的港口布局指南。然而,由于患者形态、解剖结构的变化,特别是某些腹腔镜手术中因吹入引起的器官移位,仍然存在挑战。本研究的目的是设计和开发一种决策辅助工具,用于机器人辅助子宫切除术中的最佳端口放置,该辅助工具可考虑患者的可变性和因吹入引起的器官移位。方法构建三个组件:机器人模型、患者专用模型和优化算法。这三个组件被整合在一起,并使用四名接受机器人子宫切除术的不同患者对该系统进行了验证。一旦得到验证,两名专家外科医生被要求评估面部和结构有效性的决策辅助。使用目标器官位于三个不同位置的躯干模型进行可用性测试。两名专家外科医生在有和没有决策辅助的情况下进行了模拟子宫切除术任务,以评估表现和满意度。结果优化算法对四名患者的个体解剖差异敏感。专家外科医生成功地建立了面部和结构的有效性。可用性测试结果显示,与不使用决策辅助的专家确定的端口位置相比,使用优化的端口可以将完成任务的时间缩短28%-40%。结论基于个体化患者专用模型、机器人模型和优化算法的决策辅助在解决机器人辅助子宫切除术中因吹入而导致器官移位的挑战方面是有效的。专家外科医生建立了决策辅助的面部和结构有效性,同时通过实验证明了任务执行的效率提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery
Laparoscopic Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery minimally invasive surgery-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery aims to provide an academic exchange platform for minimally invasive surgery at an international level. We seek out and publish the excellent original articles, reviews and editorials as well as exciting new techniques to promote the academic development. Topics of interests include, but are not limited to: ▪ Minimally invasive clinical research mainly in General Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Urology, Neurosurgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics, Gastroenterology, Orthopedics, Colorectal Surgery, Otolaryngology, etc.; ▪ Basic research in minimally invasive surgery; ▪ Research of techniques and equipments in minimally invasive surgery, and application of laparoscopy, endoscopy, robot and medical imaging; ▪ Development of medical education in minimally invasive surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信