Chemical profiling and rapid discrimination of Blumea riparia and Blumea megacephala by UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS and HPLC

IF 4.7 4区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Hongna Su , Xuexue Li , Ying Li , Yuanlin Kong , Jianlong Lan , Yanfei Huang , Yuan Liu
{"title":"Chemical profiling and rapid discrimination of Blumea riparia and Blumea megacephala by UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS and HPLC","authors":"Hongna Su ,&nbsp;Xuexue Li ,&nbsp;Ying Li ,&nbsp;Yuanlin Kong ,&nbsp;Jianlong Lan ,&nbsp;Yanfei Huang ,&nbsp;Yuan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.chmed.2022.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To rapidly identify the two morphologies and chemical properties of similar herbal medicines, <em>Blumea riparia</em> and <em>B. megacephala</em> as the basis for chemical constituent analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS was utilized for profiling and identification of the constituents in <em>B. riparia</em> and <em>B. megacephala</em>. Chemical pattern recognition (CPR) was further used to compare and distinguish the two herbs and to identify their potential characteristic markers. Then, an HPLC method was established for quality evaluation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 93 constituents are identified, including 54 phenolic acids, 35 flavonoids, two saccharides, one phenolic acid glycoside, and one other constituent, of which 67 were identified in <em>B. riparia</em> and <em>B. megacephala</em> for the first time. CPR indicates that <em>B. riparia</em> and <em>B. megacephala</em> samples can be distinguished from each other based on the LC–MS data. The isochlorogenic acid A to cryptochlorogenic acid peak area ratio calculated from the HPLC chromatograms was proposed as a differentiation index for distinguishing and quality control of <em>B. riparia</em> and <em>B. megacephala</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates significant differences between <em>B. riparia</em> and <em>B. megacephala</em> in terms of chemical composition. The results provide a rapid and simple strategy for the comparison and evaluation of the quality of <em>B. riparia</em> and <em>B. megacephala</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9916,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Herbal Medicines","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Herbal Medicines","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674638422001228","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective

To rapidly identify the two morphologies and chemical properties of similar herbal medicines, Blumea riparia and B. megacephala as the basis for chemical constituent analysis.

Methods

UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS was utilized for profiling and identification of the constituents in B. riparia and B. megacephala. Chemical pattern recognition (CPR) was further used to compare and distinguish the two herbs and to identify their potential characteristic markers. Then, an HPLC method was established for quality evaluation.

Results

A total of 93 constituents are identified, including 54 phenolic acids, 35 flavonoids, two saccharides, one phenolic acid glycoside, and one other constituent, of which 67 were identified in B. riparia and B. megacephala for the first time. CPR indicates that B. riparia and B. megacephala samples can be distinguished from each other based on the LC–MS data. The isochlorogenic acid A to cryptochlorogenic acid peak area ratio calculated from the HPLC chromatograms was proposed as a differentiation index for distinguishing and quality control of B. riparia and B. megacephala.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates significant differences between B. riparia and B. megacephala in terms of chemical composition. The results provide a rapid and simple strategy for the comparison and evaluation of the quality of B. riparia and B. megacephala.

UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS和高效液相色谱法快速鉴别白百菌和大头菌
目的快速鉴定两种相似中药材——白暨松和大脑白暨松的形态和化学性质,为化学成分分析提供依据。方法采用UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS技术,对瑞帕草和大头草的主要成分进行分析鉴定。化学模式识别(CPR)被进一步用于比较和区分这两种草药,并鉴定其潜在的特征标记。建立了高效液相色谱法进行质量评价。结果共鉴定出93种成分,包括54种酚酸、35种黄酮类化合物、2种糖类、1种酚酸糖苷和1种其他成分,其中67种为首次在裂孔藻和大头藻中鉴定。CPR表明,根据LC–MS数据,可以将里帕氏B.riparia和巨型B.megacephala样本区分开来。根据高效液相色谱图计算出的等绿原酸A与隐绿原酸峰面积比,作为鉴别和质量控制的鉴别指标。结论本研究表明,白鳍豚和大头豚在化学成分上存在显著差异。该结果为比较和评价裂孔藻和大头藻的质量提供了一种快速、简单的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chinese Herbal Medicines
Chinese Herbal Medicines CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
629
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信