Percepción de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en un área de críticos

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R.M. Peradejordi-Torres RN, J. Valls-Matarín PhD, MSR, RN
{"title":"Percepción de la cultura de seguridad del paciente en un área de críticos","authors":"R.M. Peradejordi-Torres RN,&nbsp;J. Valls-Matarín PhD, MSR, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2022.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Critical Care Area (CCA) is one of the most complex in the hospital system, requiring a high number of interventions and handling of amounts of information. Therefore, these areas are likely to experience more incidents that compromise patient safety (PS).</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To determine the perception of the healthcare team in a critical care area about the patient safety culture.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Cross-sectional descriptive study, September 2021, in a polyvalent CCA with 45 beds, 118 health workers (physicians, nurses, auxiliary nursing care technicians). Sociodemographic variables, knowledge of the person in charge in PS and their general training in PS and incident notification system were collected. The validated Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire, measuring 12 dimensions was used. Positive responses with an average score ≥75%, were defined as an area of strength while ≥50% negative responses were defined as an area of weakness. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis: χ<sup>2</sup> and t-Student tests, and ANOVA. Significance p ≤ 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>94 questionnaires were collected (79.7% sample). The PS score was 7.1 (1.2) range 1-10. The rotational staff scored the PS with 6.9 (1.2) compared to 7.8 (0.9) for non-rotational staff (p = 0.04). A 54.3% (n = 51) was familiar with the incident reporting procedure, 53% (n = 27) of which had not reported any in the last year. No dimension was defined as strength.There were three dimensions that behaved like a weakness: security perception: 57.7% (95% CI: 52.7-62.6), staffing: 81.7% (95% CI: 77.4-85.2) and management support: 69 .9% (95% CI: 64.3-74.9).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The assessment of PS in the CCA is moderately high, although the rotational staff has a lower appreciation. Half of the staff do not know the procedure for reporting an incident. The notification rate is low. The weaknesses detected are perception of security, staffing and management support. The analysis of the patient safety culture can be useful to implement improvement measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239922001146","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Critical Care Area (CCA) is one of the most complex in the hospital system, requiring a high number of interventions and handling of amounts of information. Therefore, these areas are likely to experience more incidents that compromise patient safety (PS).

Aim

To determine the perception of the healthcare team in a critical care area about the patient safety culture.

Method

Cross-sectional descriptive study, September 2021, in a polyvalent CCA with 45 beds, 118 health workers (physicians, nurses, auxiliary nursing care technicians). Sociodemographic variables, knowledge of the person in charge in PS and their general training in PS and incident notification system were collected. The validated Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture questionnaire, measuring 12 dimensions was used. Positive responses with an average score ≥75%, were defined as an area of strength while ≥50% negative responses were defined as an area of weakness. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis: χ2 and t-Student tests, and ANOVA. Significance p ≤ 0.05.

Results

94 questionnaires were collected (79.7% sample). The PS score was 7.1 (1.2) range 1-10. The rotational staff scored the PS with 6.9 (1.2) compared to 7.8 (0.9) for non-rotational staff (p = 0.04). A 54.3% (n = 51) was familiar with the incident reporting procedure, 53% (n = 27) of which had not reported any in the last year. No dimension was defined as strength.There were three dimensions that behaved like a weakness: security perception: 57.7% (95% CI: 52.7-62.6), staffing: 81.7% (95% CI: 77.4-85.2) and management support: 69 .9% (95% CI: 64.3-74.9).

Conclusions

The assessment of PS in the CCA is moderately high, although the rotational staff has a lower appreciation. Half of the staff do not know the procedure for reporting an incident. The notification rate is low. The weaknesses detected are perception of security, staffing and management support. The analysis of the patient safety culture can be useful to implement improvement measures.

对关键地区患者安全文化的看法
引言重症监护区(CCA)是医院系统中最复杂的区域之一,需要大量的干预措施和信息处理。因此,这些地区可能会发生更多危及患者安全的事件。目的确定重症监护地区的医疗团队对患者安全文化的看法。方法横断面描述性研究,2021年9月,在一项多价CCA中,共有45张床位,118名卫生工作者(医生、护士、辅助护理技术人员)。收集社会记录变量、PS负责人的知识以及他们在PS和事件通知系统中的一般培训。使用经验证的医院患者安全文化调查问卷,测量12个维度。平均得分≥75%的阳性反应被定义为力量区域,而≥50%的阴性反应则被定义为弱点区域。描述性统计和双变量分析:χ2和t-学生检验以及方差分析。显著性p≤0.05。结果收集了94份问卷(79.7%的样本)。PS评分为7.1(1.2),范围1-10。轮换员工的PS得分为6.9(1.2),而非轮换员工的得分为7.8(0.9)(p=0.04)。54.3%(n=51)熟悉事件报告程序,其中53%(n=27)在去年没有报告任何事件。没有将尺寸定义为强度。有三个维度表现为弱点:安全感知:57.7%(95%CI:52.76-2.6),人员配置:81.7%(95%CI:77.4-85.2)和管理支持:69.9%(95%CI:64.3-74.9)。一半的员工不知道报告事件的程序。通知率低。发现的弱点是对安全、人员配置和管理支助的认识。对患者安全文化的分析有助于实施改进措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信