La disfagia en cuidados intensivos, un problema real: análisis de factores de riesgo

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING
L.P. Armas-Navarro RN , Y.G. Santana-Padilla RN, MSc, PhD , L. Mendoza-Segura MD , M. Ramos-Díaz MD , B.N. Santana-López RN, MSc (PhD candidate) , J.A. Alcaraz-Jiménez RN, MSc , J. Rico-Rodríguez MD , L. Santana-Cabrera MD, PhD
{"title":"La disfagia en cuidados intensivos, un problema real: análisis de factores de riesgo","authors":"L.P. Armas-Navarro RN ,&nbsp;Y.G. Santana-Padilla RN, MSc, PhD ,&nbsp;L. Mendoza-Segura MD ,&nbsp;M. Ramos-Díaz MD ,&nbsp;B.N. Santana-López RN, MSc (PhD candidate) ,&nbsp;J.A. Alcaraz-Jiménez RN, MSc ,&nbsp;J. Rico-Rodríguez MD ,&nbsp;L. Santana-Cabrera MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2022.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To identify risk factors present in patients with dysphagia in a population of critically ill patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Case series of a cohort of patients recruited in the intensive care unit (ICU) until hospital discharge. Patients who gave consent and met the inclusion criteria were recruited. The Volume-Viscosity clinical examination method was used for the screening of dysphagia. An uni- and bivariate statistical analysis was performed using odds ratio (OR) to detect risk factors for dysphagia.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes</h3><p>103 patients were recruited from 401 possible. The mean age was 59,33±13,23, men represented 76,7%. The severity of the sample was: APACHE II (12,74±6,17) and Charlson (2,98±3,31). 45,6% of patients showed dysphagia, obtaining significant OR values (p&lt;0,050) for the development of dysphagia: older age, neurological antecedents, COVID19, long stay in ICU and hospitalization, and the presence of tracheotomy. COVID19 patients represented 46,6% of the sample, so an analysis of this subgroup was performed, showing similar results, with a Charlson risk (OR:4,65; 95% CI:1,31-16,47; p=0,014) and a hospital stay (OR: 8,50; 95%CI: 2,20-32,83; p&lt;0,001). On discharge from the ICU, 37,9% of the population still had dysphagia; 12,6% maintained this problem at hospital discharge.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Almost half of our patients developed dysphagia. Clinical severity and the presence of tracheotomy were risk factors. We observed in patients with dysphagia a longer stay in both ICU and hospitalization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43993,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Intensiva","volume":"34 3","pages":"Pages 115-125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239922001092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aims

To identify risk factors present in patients with dysphagia in a population of critically ill patients.

Methods

Case series of a cohort of patients recruited in the intensive care unit (ICU) until hospital discharge. Patients who gave consent and met the inclusion criteria were recruited. The Volume-Viscosity clinical examination method was used for the screening of dysphagia. An uni- and bivariate statistical analysis was performed using odds ratio (OR) to detect risk factors for dysphagia.

Outcomes

103 patients were recruited from 401 possible. The mean age was 59,33±13,23, men represented 76,7%. The severity of the sample was: APACHE II (12,74±6,17) and Charlson (2,98±3,31). 45,6% of patients showed dysphagia, obtaining significant OR values (p<0,050) for the development of dysphagia: older age, neurological antecedents, COVID19, long stay in ICU and hospitalization, and the presence of tracheotomy. COVID19 patients represented 46,6% of the sample, so an analysis of this subgroup was performed, showing similar results, with a Charlson risk (OR:4,65; 95% CI:1,31-16,47; p=0,014) and a hospital stay (OR: 8,50; 95%CI: 2,20-32,83; p<0,001). On discharge from the ICU, 37,9% of the population still had dysphagia; 12,6% maintained this problem at hospital discharge.

Conclusions

Almost half of our patients developed dysphagia. Clinical severity and the presence of tracheotomy were risk factors. We observed in patients with dysphagia a longer stay in both ICU and hospitalization.

重症监护中的吞咽困难--一个现实问题:危险因素分析
目的确定危重患者群体中吞咽困难患者存在的危险因素。方法在重症监护室(ICU)招募一组患者,直到出院。同意并符合纳入标准的患者被招募。采用容量粘度临床检查法筛查吞咽困难。使用比值比(OR)进行单变量和双变量统计分析,以检测吞咽困难的风险因素。结果103名患者来自401名可能的患者。平均年龄为59,33±13,23,男性占76.7%。样本的严重程度为:APACHE II(12,74±6,17)和Charlson(2,98±3,31)。45.6%的患者表现出吞咽困难,对吞咽困难的发展获得了显著的OR值(p<;0050):年龄较大、有神经病史、新冠肺炎19、长期入住ICU和住院,以及有气管切开术。COVID19患者占样本的46.6%,因此对该亚组进行了分析,显示出类似的结果,具有Charlson风险(OR:4,65;95%CI:1,31-16,47;p=0.014)和住院时间(OR:8,50;95%CI:2,20-32,83;p<;0001)。ICU出院后,37.9%的患者仍有吞咽困难;12.6%的患者在出院时仍存在此问题。结论近一半患者出现吞咽困难。临床严重程度和气管切开是危险因素。我们观察到吞咽困难患者在ICU和住院治疗的时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Enfermería Intensiva es el medio de comunicación por antonomasia para todos los profesionales de enfermería españoles que desarrollan su actividad profesional en las unidades de cuidados intensivos o en cualquier otro lugar donde se atiende al paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva publica cuatro números al año, cuyos temas son específicos para la enfermería de cuidados intensivos. Es la única publicación en español con carácter nacional y está indexada en prestigiosas bases de datos como International Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Índice de Enfermería, Cuiden, Índice Médico Español, Toxline, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信