Modeling the dynamic performance of transportation infrastructure using panel data model in state-space specifications

IF 7.4 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Bingye Han , Zengming Du , Lei Dai , Jianming Ling , Fulu Wei
{"title":"Modeling the dynamic performance of transportation infrastructure using panel data model in state-space specifications","authors":"Bingye Han ,&nbsp;Zengming Du ,&nbsp;Lei Dai ,&nbsp;Jianming Ling ,&nbsp;Fulu Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.jtte.2021.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, different modeling approaches used in panel data for performance forecast of transportation infrastructure are firstly reviewed, and the panel data models (PDMs) are highlighted for longitudinal data sets. The state-space specification of PDMs are proposed as a framework to formulate dynamic performance models for transportation facilities and panel data sets are used for estimation. The models could simultaneously capture the heterogeneity and update forecast through inspections. PDMs are applied to tackle the cross-section heterogeneity of longitudinal data, and PDMs in state-space forms are used to achieve the goal of updating performance forecast with new coming data. To illustrate the methodology, three classes of dynamic PDMs are presented in four examples to compare with two classes of static PDMs for a group of composite pavement sections in an airport in east China. Estimation results obtained by ordinary least square (OLS) estimator and system generalized method of moments (SGMM) are compared for two dynamic instances. The results show that the average root mean square errors of dynamic specifications are all significantly lower than those of static counterparts as prediction continues over time. There is no significant difference of prediction accuracy between state-space model and curve shifting model over a short time. In addition, SGMM does not obtain higher prediction accuracy than OLS in this case. Finally, it is recommended to specify the inspection intervals as several constants with integer multiples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering-English Edition","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095756423000570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, different modeling approaches used in panel data for performance forecast of transportation infrastructure are firstly reviewed, and the panel data models (PDMs) are highlighted for longitudinal data sets. The state-space specification of PDMs are proposed as a framework to formulate dynamic performance models for transportation facilities and panel data sets are used for estimation. The models could simultaneously capture the heterogeneity and update forecast through inspections. PDMs are applied to tackle the cross-section heterogeneity of longitudinal data, and PDMs in state-space forms are used to achieve the goal of updating performance forecast with new coming data. To illustrate the methodology, three classes of dynamic PDMs are presented in four examples to compare with two classes of static PDMs for a group of composite pavement sections in an airport in east China. Estimation results obtained by ordinary least square (OLS) estimator and system generalized method of moments (SGMM) are compared for two dynamic instances. The results show that the average root mean square errors of dynamic specifications are all significantly lower than those of static counterparts as prediction continues over time. There is no significant difference of prediction accuracy between state-space model and curve shifting model over a short time. In addition, SGMM does not obtain higher prediction accuracy than OLS in this case. Finally, it is recommended to specify the inspection intervals as several constants with integer multiples.

使用状态空间规范中的面板数据模型对交通基础设施的动态性能进行建模
在本研究中,首先回顾了用于交通基础设施性能预测的面板数据中使用的不同建模方法,并重点介绍了纵向数据集的面板数据模型。提出了PDM的状态空间规范作为制定交通设施动态性能模型的框架,并使用面板数据集进行估计。这些模型可以同时捕捉异质性,并通过检查更新预测。PDM用于解决纵向数据的横截面异质性,状态空间形式的PDM用于实现用新数据更新性能预测的目标。为了说明该方法,在四个例子中给出了三类动态PDM,并与华东某机场一组复合材料路面路段的两类静态PDM进行了比较。针对两个动态实例,比较了普通最小二乘(OLS)估计器和系统广义矩法(SGMM)的估计结果。结果表明,随着预测的持续,动态规范的平均均方根误差都显著低于静态规范的平均都方根误差。在短时间内,状态空间模型和曲线移动模型的预测精度没有显著差异。此外,在这种情况下,SGMM没有获得比OLS更高的预测精度。最后,建议将检查间隔指定为几个整数倍的常数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
6.30%
发文量
402
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition) serves as a renowned academic platform facilitating the exchange and exploration of innovative ideas in the realm of transportation. Our journal aims to foster theoretical and experimental research in transportation and welcomes the submission of exceptional peer-reviewed papers on engineering, planning, management, and information technology. We are dedicated to expediting the peer review process and ensuring timely publication of top-notch research in this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信