Concurrent measures of impulsive action and choice are partially related and differentially modulated by dopamine D1- and D2-like receptors in a rat model of impulsivity

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Lidia Bellés, Chloé Arrondeau, Ginna Urueña-Méndez, Nathalie Ginovart
{"title":"Concurrent measures of impulsive action and choice are partially related and differentially modulated by dopamine D1- and D2-like receptors in a rat model of impulsivity","authors":"Lidia Bellés,&nbsp;Chloé Arrondeau,&nbsp;Ginna Urueña-Méndez,&nbsp;Nathalie Ginovart","doi":"10.1016/j.pbb.2022.173508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Impulsivity is a multidimensional construct, but the relationships between its constructs and their respective underlying dopaminergic underpinnings in the general population remain unclear. A cohort of Roman high- (RHA) and low- (RLA) avoidance rats were tested for impulsive action and risky decision-making in the rat gambling task, and then for delay discounting in the delay-discounting task to concurrently measure the relationships among the three constructs of impulsivity using a within-subject design. Then, we evaluated the effects of dopaminergic drugs on the three constructs of impulsivity, considering innate differences in impulsive behaviors at baseline. Risky decision-making and delay-discounting were positively correlated, indicating that both constructs of impulsive choice are related. Impulsive action positively correlated with risky decision-making but not with delay discounting, suggesting partial overlap between impulsive action and impulsive choice. RHAs showed a more impulsive phenotype in the three constructs of impulsivity compared to RLAs, demonstrating the comorbid nature of impulsivity in a population of rats. Amphetamine increased impulsive action and had no effect on risky decision-making regardless of baseline levels of impulsivity, but it decreased delay discounting only in high impulsive RHAs. In contrast, while D<sub>1</sub>R and D<sub>3</sub>R agonism as well as D<sub>2/3</sub>R partial agonism decreased impulsive action regardless of baseline levels of impulsivity, D<sub>2/3</sub>R agonism decreased impulsive action exclusively in high impulsive RHAs. Irrespective of baseline levels of impulsivity, risky decision-making was increased by D<sub>1</sub>R and D<sub>2/3</sub>R agonism but not by D<sub>3</sub>R agonism or D<sub>2/3</sub>R partial agonism. Finally, while D<sub>1</sub>R and D<sub>3</sub>R agonism, D<sub>2/3</sub>R partial agonism and D<sub>2</sub>R blockade increased delay discounting irrespective of baseline levels of impulsivity, D<sub>2/3</sub>R agonism decreased it in low impulsive RLAs only. These findings indicate that the acute effects of dopamine drugs were partially overlapping across dimensions of impulsivity, and that only D<sub>2/3</sub>R agonism showed baseline-dependent effects on impulsive action and impulsive choice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19893,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","volume":"222 ","pages":"Article 173508"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091305722001873","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Impulsivity is a multidimensional construct, but the relationships between its constructs and their respective underlying dopaminergic underpinnings in the general population remain unclear. A cohort of Roman high- (RHA) and low- (RLA) avoidance rats were tested for impulsive action and risky decision-making in the rat gambling task, and then for delay discounting in the delay-discounting task to concurrently measure the relationships among the three constructs of impulsivity using a within-subject design. Then, we evaluated the effects of dopaminergic drugs on the three constructs of impulsivity, considering innate differences in impulsive behaviors at baseline. Risky decision-making and delay-discounting were positively correlated, indicating that both constructs of impulsive choice are related. Impulsive action positively correlated with risky decision-making but not with delay discounting, suggesting partial overlap between impulsive action and impulsive choice. RHAs showed a more impulsive phenotype in the three constructs of impulsivity compared to RLAs, demonstrating the comorbid nature of impulsivity in a population of rats. Amphetamine increased impulsive action and had no effect on risky decision-making regardless of baseline levels of impulsivity, but it decreased delay discounting only in high impulsive RHAs. In contrast, while D1R and D3R agonism as well as D2/3R partial agonism decreased impulsive action regardless of baseline levels of impulsivity, D2/3R agonism decreased impulsive action exclusively in high impulsive RHAs. Irrespective of baseline levels of impulsivity, risky decision-making was increased by D1R and D2/3R agonism but not by D3R agonism or D2/3R partial agonism. Finally, while D1R and D3R agonism, D2/3R partial agonism and D2R blockade increased delay discounting irrespective of baseline levels of impulsivity, D2/3R agonism decreased it in low impulsive RLAs only. These findings indicate that the acute effects of dopamine drugs were partially overlapping across dimensions of impulsivity, and that only D2/3R agonism showed baseline-dependent effects on impulsive action and impulsive choice.

在大鼠冲动模型中,冲动行为和选择的同时测量与多巴胺D1和D2样受体部分相关并有差异地调节
冲动是一个多层面的结构,但其结构与其在普通人群中各自潜在的多巴胺能基础之间的关系仍不清楚。一组罗马高(RHA)和低(RLA)回避大鼠在老鼠赌博任务中的冲动行为和风险决策进行了测试,然后在延迟折扣任务中进行了延迟折扣,以使用受试者内部设计同时测量冲动的三种结构之间的关系。然后,考虑到基线时冲动行为的先天差异,我们评估了多巴胺能药物对冲动三种结构的影响。风险决策和延迟折扣呈正相关,表明冲动选择的两个结构是相关的。冲动行为与风险决策呈正相关,但与延迟折扣无关,这表明冲动行为和冲动选择之间存在部分重叠。与RLA相比,RHA在冲动性的三种结构中表现出更冲动的表型,证明了大鼠群体中冲动性的共病性质。安非他命增加了冲动行为,无论冲动的基线水平如何,都对风险决策没有影响,但它只在高冲动RHA中降低了延迟折扣。相反,尽管D1R和D3R激动剂以及D2/3R部分激动剂在不考虑基线冲动水平的情况下降低了冲动作用,但D2/3R激动剂仅在高冲动RHA中减少了冲动作用。无论冲动的基线水平如何,D1R和D2/3R激动剂都会增加风险决策,但D3R激动剂或D2/3R部分激动剂不会增加风险决策。最后,尽管D1R和D3R激动剂、D2/3R部分激动剂和D2R阻断增加了延迟折扣,而与基线冲动水平无关,D2/3R激动剂仅在低冲动RLA中降低了延迟折扣。这些发现表明,多巴胺药物的急性作用在冲动性维度上部分重叠,只有D2/3R激动剂对冲动行为和冲动选择表现出基线依赖性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior publishes original reports in the areas of pharmacology and biochemistry in which the primary emphasis and theoretical context are behavioral. Contributions may involve clinical, preclinical, or basic research. Purely biochemical or toxicology studies will not be published. Papers describing the behavioral effects of novel drugs in models of psychiatric, neurological and cognitive disorders, and central pain must include a positive control unless the paper is on a disease where such a drug is not available yet. Papers focusing on physiological processes (e.g., peripheral pain mechanisms, body temperature regulation, seizure activity) are not accepted as we would like to retain the focus of Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior on behavior and its interaction with the biochemistry and neurochemistry of the central nervous system. Papers describing the effects of plant materials are generally not considered, unless the active ingredients are studied, the extraction method is well described, the doses tested are known, and clear and definite experimental evidence on the mechanism of action of the active ingredients is provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信