Mentoring underrepresented students for success: Self-regulated learning strategies as a critical link between mentor support and educational attainment
Joseph C. Tise , Paul R. Hernandez , P. Wesley Schultz
{"title":"Mentoring underrepresented students for success: Self-regulated learning strategies as a critical link between mentor support and educational attainment","authors":"Joseph C. Tise , Paul R. Hernandez , P. Wesley Schultz","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Growing and diversifying science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professional communities is critically important. According to the Process Model of Mentoring Interactions, two areas of research can be leveraged in pursuit of this goal: mentoring and self-regulated learning (SRL). This study examined the mediating role of learning strategies in explaining how implicit theories of intelligence (mindset) and mentoring support predict academic achievement among university students (operationalized as highest degree attained). Participants (<em>N</em> = 1,094) were from historically underrepresented backgrounds pursuing an undergraduate STEM degree from one of 38 universities across the U.S. Longitudinal data were collected via biannual surveys (fall, spring semesters) to assess academic mindset, faculty mentoring, learning strategy use, and highest degree attained (measured by National Student Clearinghouse graduation/enrollment data). Parallel processes latent growth-curves in a structural equation modeling framework were used to test the mediating role of strategy use on academic achievement. Results showed that reported strategy use was stable over time and mediated the relationship between faculty mentoring support and highest degree attained. Both having a faculty mentor as an undergraduate (vs. not) and higher quality of mentor support predicted higher strategy use, which in turn predicted higher degree attainment. Mindset was unrelated to strategy use or academic achievement. This study is one of the first to empirically demonstrate one process by which mentoring leads to greater academic achievement: via students’ use of SRL strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10635,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 102233"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X23000875","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Growing and diversifying science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) professional communities is critically important. According to the Process Model of Mentoring Interactions, two areas of research can be leveraged in pursuit of this goal: mentoring and self-regulated learning (SRL). This study examined the mediating role of learning strategies in explaining how implicit theories of intelligence (mindset) and mentoring support predict academic achievement among university students (operationalized as highest degree attained). Participants (N = 1,094) were from historically underrepresented backgrounds pursuing an undergraduate STEM degree from one of 38 universities across the U.S. Longitudinal data were collected via biannual surveys (fall, spring semesters) to assess academic mindset, faculty mentoring, learning strategy use, and highest degree attained (measured by National Student Clearinghouse graduation/enrollment data). Parallel processes latent growth-curves in a structural equation modeling framework were used to test the mediating role of strategy use on academic achievement. Results showed that reported strategy use was stable over time and mediated the relationship between faculty mentoring support and highest degree attained. Both having a faculty mentor as an undergraduate (vs. not) and higher quality of mentor support predicted higher strategy use, which in turn predicted higher degree attainment. Mindset was unrelated to strategy use or academic achievement. This study is one of the first to empirically demonstrate one process by which mentoring leads to greater academic achievement: via students’ use of SRL strategies.
期刊介绍:
Contemporary Educational Psychology is a scholarly journal that publishes empirical research from various parts of the world. The research aims to substantially advance, extend, or re-envision the ongoing discourse in educational psychology research and practice. To be considered for publication, manuscripts must be well-grounded in a comprehensive theoretical and empirical framework. This framework should raise critical and timely questions that educational psychology currently faces. Additionally, the questions asked should be closely related to the chosen methodological approach, and the authors should provide actionable implications for education research and practice. The journal seeks to publish manuscripts that offer cutting-edge theoretical and methodological perspectives on critical and timely education questions.
The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Contents Pages in Education, Australian Educational Index, Current Contents, EBSCOhost, Education Index, ERA, PsycINFO, Sociology of Education Abstracts, PubMed/Medline, BIOSIS Previews, and others.