Coupling MCDM-based ensemble and AHP for the sustainable management of erosion risk in a tropical Sub-Saharan basin

Saheed Adekunle Raji , Akinlabi O. Akintuyi , Emmanuel O. Wunude , Busayo Fashoto
{"title":"Coupling MCDM-based ensemble and AHP for the sustainable management of erosion risk in a tropical Sub-Saharan basin","authors":"Saheed Adekunle Raji ,&nbsp;Akinlabi O. Akintuyi ,&nbsp;Emmanuel O. Wunude ,&nbsp;Busayo Fashoto","doi":"10.1016/j.wsee.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intensified erosion threats are one of the major ecological problems ravaging global basins. To address this problem, it is crucial to identify erosion-prone areas at the sub-watershed level. In this study, a seven multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models ensemble was developed to prioritize sub-watersheds in the Anambra Basin based on erosion risk. The integration of the MCDM models with the Analytical Hierarchical Process and Geographic Information System with 23 geomorphometric parameters (specifically 12 linear, 6 shape, and 5 relief parameters), enabled a comprehensive ranking approach. The accuracy of the models was tested using normalised Spearman's rank correlation to compute a uniform sub-watershed ranking. The results revealed that the study area is a 7th order basin with drainage densities between 0.54 km/km<sup>2</sup> to 0.62 km/km<sup>2</sup>, average peak flow between 88 m<sup>3</sup>/sec to 361 m<sup>3</sup>/sec, texture ratio between 2.54/km to 11.25/km, and mean basin slope values between 10.9° to 22.2°. Out of the eight sub-watersheds, as indicated by the MCDM models, H returned the highest aggregate rank (1st), making it the top priority for erosion risk mitigation while B ranked the least (8th) suggesting the presence of some environmental conditions that are less erosion prone. The top-ranked MCDM models, MOORA (multi-objective optimisation based on ratio analysis) and COPRAS (complex proportional assessment), show that they are the best options for managing erosion in the Anambra Basin. These findings offer prospects for sustainable erosion risk control at the sub-watershed level and a scientific basis for resource management for basins with similar characteristics around the world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101280,"journal":{"name":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 186-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471423000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intensified erosion threats are one of the major ecological problems ravaging global basins. To address this problem, it is crucial to identify erosion-prone areas at the sub-watershed level. In this study, a seven multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models ensemble was developed to prioritize sub-watersheds in the Anambra Basin based on erosion risk. The integration of the MCDM models with the Analytical Hierarchical Process and Geographic Information System with 23 geomorphometric parameters (specifically 12 linear, 6 shape, and 5 relief parameters), enabled a comprehensive ranking approach. The accuracy of the models was tested using normalised Spearman's rank correlation to compute a uniform sub-watershed ranking. The results revealed that the study area is a 7th order basin with drainage densities between 0.54 km/km2 to 0.62 km/km2, average peak flow between 88 m3/sec to 361 m3/sec, texture ratio between 2.54/km to 11.25/km, and mean basin slope values between 10.9° to 22.2°. Out of the eight sub-watersheds, as indicated by the MCDM models, H returned the highest aggregate rank (1st), making it the top priority for erosion risk mitigation while B ranked the least (8th) suggesting the presence of some environmental conditions that are less erosion prone. The top-ranked MCDM models, MOORA (multi-objective optimisation based on ratio analysis) and COPRAS (complex proportional assessment), show that they are the best options for managing erosion in the Anambra Basin. These findings offer prospects for sustainable erosion risk control at the sub-watershed level and a scientific basis for resource management for basins with similar characteristics around the world.

Abstract Image

基于mcdm和AHP的热带撒哈拉以南盆地侵蚀风险可持续管理的耦合研究
侵蚀威胁加剧是破坏全球流域的主要生态问题之一。为了解决这一问题,在子流域一级确定易受侵蚀的地区至关重要。在这项研究中,开发了一个七个多标准决策(MCDM)模型集合,以根据侵蚀风险对阿南布拉盆地的子流域进行优先排序。MCDM模型与具有23个地貌参数(特别是12个线性参数、6个形状参数和5个起伏参数)的分析层次过程和地理信息系统相结合,实现了综合排名方法。使用归一化的Spearman秩相关性来计算统一的子流域排序,从而测试了模型的准确性。结果表明,研究区为7级流域,流域密度在0.54 km/km2至0.62 km/km2之间,平均洪峰流量在88 m3/s至361 m3/s之间,质地比在2.54/km至11.25/km之间,平均流域坡度值在10.9°至22.2°之间。如MCDM模型所示,在8个子流域中,使其成为缓解侵蚀风险的首要任务,而B排名最低(第8位),这表明存在一些不太容易受到侵蚀的环境条件。排名靠前的MCDM模型MOORA(基于比率分析的多目标优化)和COPRAS(复杂比例评估)表明,它们是管理阿南布拉盆地侵蚀的最佳选择。这些发现为子流域层面的可持续侵蚀风险控制提供了前景,并为世界各地具有类似特征的流域的资源管理提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信