When is it wise to use artificial intelligence for platform operations considering consumer returns?

IF 5.3 2区 材料科学 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Xiaoping Xu , Zhaofu Hong , Yujing Chen , T.C.E. Cheng
{"title":"When is it wise to use artificial intelligence for platform operations considering consumer returns?","authors":"Xiaoping Xu ,&nbsp;Zhaofu Hong ,&nbsp;Yujing Chen ,&nbsp;T.C.E. Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2022.11.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We consider a supply chain comprising a manufacturer and a platform, where the former sells its products through an offline channel and the latter. The platform has two operational modes, namely the marketplace and reselling modes. Platform power refers to the platform's ability to increase the market size, while network effects concern the platform's effect on the offline channel. Consumers may return dissatisfied products brought from the platform within a return window. Without artificial intelligence (AI), the optimal production quantities in both the marketplace and reselling modes increase (decrease) with the platform power under low (high) network effects. The optimal profit of the manufacturer in the marketplace mode increases with the platform power and the direction may be positive in the reselling mode. With AI, the optimal profits of the manufacturer in the two modes always increase with the platform power. Comparing the cases with and without AI, we find that using AI in the marketplace mode increases (decreases) the manufacturer's profit under low (high) network effects. And using AI in the reselling mode increases (decreases) the platform's profit under low (high) network effects. With and without AI, the marketplace mode cannot coordinate the supply chain, while the reselling mode can. We also extend our work by considering several cases to check the robustness of the results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Nano Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Nano Materials","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221722008931","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We consider a supply chain comprising a manufacturer and a platform, where the former sells its products through an offline channel and the latter. The platform has two operational modes, namely the marketplace and reselling modes. Platform power refers to the platform's ability to increase the market size, while network effects concern the platform's effect on the offline channel. Consumers may return dissatisfied products brought from the platform within a return window. Without artificial intelligence (AI), the optimal production quantities in both the marketplace and reselling modes increase (decrease) with the platform power under low (high) network effects. The optimal profit of the manufacturer in the marketplace mode increases with the platform power and the direction may be positive in the reselling mode. With AI, the optimal profits of the manufacturer in the two modes always increase with the platform power. Comparing the cases with and without AI, we find that using AI in the marketplace mode increases (decreases) the manufacturer's profit under low (high) network effects. And using AI in the reselling mode increases (decreases) the platform's profit under low (high) network effects. With and without AI, the marketplace mode cannot coordinate the supply chain, while the reselling mode can. We also extend our work by considering several cases to check the robustness of the results.

考虑到消费者的回报,什么时候使用人工智能进行平台运营是明智的?
我们考虑一个由制造商和平台组成的供应链,前者通过线下渠道销售产品,后者通过线下途径销售产品。该平台有两种运营模式,即市场和转售模式。平台力量是指平台增加市场规模的能力,而网络效应是指平台对线下渠道的影响。消费者可以在退货窗口内退货平台带来的不满意产品。在没有人工智能(AI)的情况下,在低(高)网络效应下,市场和转售模式中的最佳生产量都会随着平台功率的增加而增加(减少)。制造商在市场模式下的最佳利润随着平台力量的增加而增加,并且在转售模式下方向可能是正的。有了人工智能,制造商在这两种模式下的最优利润总是随着平台力量的增加而增加。比较有和没有人工智能的情况,我们发现在低(高)网络效应下,在市场模式中使用人工智能会增加(减少)制造商的利润。在低(高)网络效应下,在转售模式中使用人工智能会增加(减少)平台的利润。无论有没有人工智能,市场模式都无法协调供应链,而转售模式可以。我们还通过考虑几个案例来扩展我们的工作,以检查结果的稳健性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
1601
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Nano Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to applications of nanomaterials. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important applications of nanomaterials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信