Efficacy of microbial antagonists in the management of bacterial wilt of field-grown tomato

Arthur O. Wamani , James W. Muthomi , Eunice Mutitu , Wanjohi J. Waceke
{"title":"Efficacy of microbial antagonists in the management of bacterial wilt of field-grown tomato","authors":"Arthur O. Wamani ,&nbsp;James W. Muthomi ,&nbsp;Eunice Mutitu ,&nbsp;Wanjohi J. Waceke","doi":"10.1016/j.napere.2023.100051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bacterial wilt caused by <em>Ralstonia solanacearum</em> can cause up to 100% yield loss in tomato production and has compelled many farmers to abandon previous productive farms. Consequently, the absence of an effective control method demands an intensive such for a functional management option. The study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of microbial antagonists in managing bacterial wilt under field conditions. The experiment was laid down under Randomized Complete Block Design and four replicates maintained for each treatment. Antagonistic strains of locally isolated <em>Trichoderma hamatum</em>, <em>T. atroviride</em>, <em>T. harzianum</em>, <em>Bacillus subtilis</em>, <em>Serratia</em> spp., and <em>Acinetobacter</em> spp. were assessed. Commercial formulations of <em>T. viride</em> (Bio Cure F®) and <em>Pseudomonas fluorescence</em> (Bio Cure B®) were included as standard checks. Treatment application was initiated at transplanting by drenching the rhizosphere with 50 ml of the inoculum. Application was repeated every two weeks until tenth week after transplanting. Data was collected on plant stand count, disease incidence, disease severity, plant height, plant biomass, and fruit weight. <em>Trichoderma hamatum</em> was the most effective in experiment 1, reducing crop mortality, incidence and AUDPC by up to 51.7%, 49.3% and 58.2%, respectively. It also exhibited the highest percentage yield increase by up to 196.4% compared to the untreated control. In contrast, <em>B. subtilis</em> showed superior disease suppression in experiment 2, reducing crop mortality, incidence and AUDPC by up to 44.6%, 48.5% and 51.0%, respectively. It also increased biomass by approximately 62.0% in both experiments. It was closely followed by <em>Serratia</em> spp., which also gave the highest yield output in experiment 2 of up to 233.0%. These findings suggest that novel antagonistic strains <em>T. hamatum</em> and <em>B. subtilis</em> presents unique opportunities for exploiting local microbial resources as biocontrol products. These products can be incorporated as part of an integrated bacterial wilt management program in farms where production is significantly affected by the disease.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100051"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Pesticide Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773078623000328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum can cause up to 100% yield loss in tomato production and has compelled many farmers to abandon previous productive farms. Consequently, the absence of an effective control method demands an intensive such for a functional management option. The study was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of microbial antagonists in managing bacterial wilt under field conditions. The experiment was laid down under Randomized Complete Block Design and four replicates maintained for each treatment. Antagonistic strains of locally isolated Trichoderma hamatum, T. atroviride, T. harzianum, Bacillus subtilis, Serratia spp., and Acinetobacter spp. were assessed. Commercial formulations of T. viride (Bio Cure F®) and Pseudomonas fluorescence (Bio Cure B®) were included as standard checks. Treatment application was initiated at transplanting by drenching the rhizosphere with 50 ml of the inoculum. Application was repeated every two weeks until tenth week after transplanting. Data was collected on plant stand count, disease incidence, disease severity, plant height, plant biomass, and fruit weight. Trichoderma hamatum was the most effective in experiment 1, reducing crop mortality, incidence and AUDPC by up to 51.7%, 49.3% and 58.2%, respectively. It also exhibited the highest percentage yield increase by up to 196.4% compared to the untreated control. In contrast, B. subtilis showed superior disease suppression in experiment 2, reducing crop mortality, incidence and AUDPC by up to 44.6%, 48.5% and 51.0%, respectively. It also increased biomass by approximately 62.0% in both experiments. It was closely followed by Serratia spp., which also gave the highest yield output in experiment 2 of up to 233.0%. These findings suggest that novel antagonistic strains T. hamatum and B. subtilis presents unique opportunities for exploiting local microbial resources as biocontrol products. These products can be incorporated as part of an integrated bacterial wilt management program in farms where production is significantly affected by the disease.

微生物拮抗剂对大田番茄青枯病的防治效果
青枯菌引起的青萎病会导致番茄生产100%的产量损失,并迫使许多农民放弃以前的生产性农场。因此,缺乏有效的控制方法需要密集的功能管理选择。本研究旨在评估微生物拮抗剂在田间条件下防治青萎病的效果。该实验是在随机完全块设计下进行的,每次治疗保持四个重复。评估了当地分离的木霉、阿特罗维里霉、哈齐亚姆霉、枯草芽孢杆菌、沙雷氏菌和不动杆菌的拮抗菌株。绿色绿脓杆菌(Bio Cure F®)和荧光假单胞菌(Bio Cure B®)的商业制剂被纳入标准检查。在移植时,通过用50ml接种物浸湿根际来开始处理应用。每两周重复一次施用,直到移植后第10周。收集了有关林分数量、发病率、疾病严重程度、株高、植物生物量和果实重量的数据。实验1中,哈马木霉最有效,分别降低了51.7%、49.3%和58.2%的作物死亡率、发病率和AUDPC。与未处理的对照相比,它还表现出最高的产量增长率,高达196.4%。相比之下,枯草芽孢杆菌在实验2中表现出优异的疾病抑制作用,分别将作物死亡率、发病率和AUDPC降低了44.6%、48.5%和51.0%。在两个实验中,它还使生物量增加了约62.0%。紧随其后的是沙雷氏菌,在实验2中产量最高,高达233.0%。这些发现表明,新的拮抗菌株T.hamatum和B.subtilis为开发当地微生物资源作为生物防治产品提供了独特的机会。这些产品可以作为综合细菌枯萎病管理计划的一部分纳入生产受到该疾病严重影响的农场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信