Novel approaches that promote lung endothelial and epithelial repair and anti pro inflammatory cytokines could be a future promising agent in the management of ARDS

Montaser Alrjoob , Alaa Alkhatib , Rana Padappayil , Husam Bader , Doantrang Du , Chandler Patton
{"title":"Novel approaches that promote lung endothelial and epithelial repair and anti pro inflammatory cytokines could be a future promising agent in the management of ARDS","authors":"Montaser Alrjoob ,&nbsp;Alaa Alkhatib ,&nbsp;Rana Padappayil ,&nbsp;Husam Bader ,&nbsp;Doantrang Du ,&nbsp;Chandler Patton","doi":"10.1016/j.clicom.2023.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common cause of respiratory failure in critically ill patients and is defined by the acute onset of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, hypoxemia, and the need for mechanical ventilation. ARDS occurs most often in the setting of pneumonia, sepsis, aspiration of gastric contents or severe trauma, and is present in ∼10% of all intensive care unit patients worldwide. Pathologic specimens from patients with ARDS most frequently reveal diffuse alveolar damage, and laboratory studies have demonstrated both alveolar epithelial and lung endothelial injury, resulting in accumulation of protein-rich inflammatory edema fluid in the alveolar space. The current therapeutic regimen is comprised of supportive measures such as lung protective ventilation, restrictive fluid management, paralyzing drugs, and prone positioning. Although vast improvements have been made in ARDS-treatment during the last five decades, mortality among patients with severe ARDS remains at an unacceptable rate of 45%.This article reviews the evolution of the currently used definition, established pathophysiological mechanism, highlights the current best clinical practice to treat ARDS, gives a brief outlook on cutting edge trends in ARDS research and closes with an expert opinion on the subject. The ongoing digital revolution will help to individualize ARDS-treatment and will therefore presumably improve survival and quality of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100269,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Immunology Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Immunology Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772613423000239","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common cause of respiratory failure in critically ill patients and is defined by the acute onset of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, hypoxemia, and the need for mechanical ventilation. ARDS occurs most often in the setting of pneumonia, sepsis, aspiration of gastric contents or severe trauma, and is present in ∼10% of all intensive care unit patients worldwide. Pathologic specimens from patients with ARDS most frequently reveal diffuse alveolar damage, and laboratory studies have demonstrated both alveolar epithelial and lung endothelial injury, resulting in accumulation of protein-rich inflammatory edema fluid in the alveolar space. The current therapeutic regimen is comprised of supportive measures such as lung protective ventilation, restrictive fluid management, paralyzing drugs, and prone positioning. Although vast improvements have been made in ARDS-treatment during the last five decades, mortality among patients with severe ARDS remains at an unacceptable rate of 45%.This article reviews the evolution of the currently used definition, established pathophysiological mechanism, highlights the current best clinical practice to treat ARDS, gives a brief outlook on cutting edge trends in ARDS research and closes with an expert opinion on the subject. The ongoing digital revolution will help to individualize ARDS-treatment and will therefore presumably improve survival and quality of life.

促进肺内皮和上皮修复和抗促炎细胞因子的新方法可能是未来治疗ARDS的有希望的药物
急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)是危重患者呼吸衰竭的常见原因,其定义为急性发作的非心源性肺水肿、低氧血症和需要机械通气。ARDS最常发生在肺炎、败血症、胃内容物抽吸或严重创伤的情况下,全球约10%的重症监护室患者都存在ARDS。ARDS患者的病理标本最常显示弥漫性肺泡损伤,实验室研究表明肺泡上皮和肺内皮损伤,导致肺泡间隙积聚富含蛋白质的炎性水肿液。目前的治疗方案包括支持性措施,如肺部保护性通气、限制性液体管理、麻痹药物和俯卧位。尽管在过去的五十年里,ARDS的治疗取得了巨大的进步,但严重ARDS患者的死亡率仍保持在45%的不可接受的水平。本文综述了目前使用的定义、已建立的病理生理机制的演变,强调了目前治疗ARDS的最佳临床实践,简要展望了ARDS研究的前沿趋势,并以专家对该主题的意见结束。正在进行的数字革命将有助于个性化ARDS治疗,因此可能会提高生存率和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信