The carbon border adjustment mechanism: What does it mean for steel recycling?

Daniel Rossetto
{"title":"The carbon border adjustment mechanism: What does it mean for steel recycling?","authors":"Daniel Rossetto","doi":"10.1016/j.horiz.2023.100048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The European Union's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) is a landmark policy proposal. As this study finds, not only might it assist in providing signals to lower emissions in some of the most greenhouse gas-intensive sectors of the world economy; it also may also drive resource recovery.</p><p>This study focuses on CBAM's impact on scrap use for steel production. It investigates the nature and magnitude of the price signal by analysing costs of compliance for steelmakers using a variety of emissions intensities of different commercially operational steelmaking techniques, applied using the proposed CBAM liability model and emissions pricing data from the clearing prices observed in the EU's emissions trading system (EU ETS). In addition, it examines historical correlations in key commodities linked to steelmaking like EU carbon allowances, steel and ferrous scrap steel, validating the observation made by some analysts that free allocation in the EU ETS mutes the incentive to recycle steel. The study identifies factors that influence the magnitude and nature of the price signal, including uncertainty about the final CBAM design, the impact of market fundamentals and feedstock commodities, alternative green steel technologies and the relative importance of the longer-term outlook compared to nearer-term market signals.</p><p>The study finds that resource recovery and recycling will lead to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and vice versa, meaning well designed measures can advance both aims. This has implications for policy makers and business managers, who will be able to focus scarce resources to capture these co-benefits. This can reduce regulatory burden in an environment where overregulation is identified by previous studies as a barrier to better waste management practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101199,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Horizons","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100048"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Horizons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772737823000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The European Union's carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) is a landmark policy proposal. As this study finds, not only might it assist in providing signals to lower emissions in some of the most greenhouse gas-intensive sectors of the world economy; it also may also drive resource recovery.

This study focuses on CBAM's impact on scrap use for steel production. It investigates the nature and magnitude of the price signal by analysing costs of compliance for steelmakers using a variety of emissions intensities of different commercially operational steelmaking techniques, applied using the proposed CBAM liability model and emissions pricing data from the clearing prices observed in the EU's emissions trading system (EU ETS). In addition, it examines historical correlations in key commodities linked to steelmaking like EU carbon allowances, steel and ferrous scrap steel, validating the observation made by some analysts that free allocation in the EU ETS mutes the incentive to recycle steel. The study identifies factors that influence the magnitude and nature of the price signal, including uncertainty about the final CBAM design, the impact of market fundamentals and feedstock commodities, alternative green steel technologies and the relative importance of the longer-term outlook compared to nearer-term market signals.

The study finds that resource recovery and recycling will lead to reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and vice versa, meaning well designed measures can advance both aims. This has implications for policy makers and business managers, who will be able to focus scarce resources to capture these co-benefits. This can reduce regulatory burden in an environment where overregulation is identified by previous studies as a barrier to better waste management practice.

碳边界调节机制:对钢铁回收意味着什么?
欧盟的碳边界调整机制(CBAM)是一项具有里程碑意义的政策建议。正如这项研究所发现的那样,它不仅有助于为世界经济中一些温室气体最密集的部门提供降低排放的信号;它还可能推动资源恢复。本研究的重点是CBAM对钢铁生产废料使用的影响。它通过分析钢铁制造商的合规成本来调查价格信号的性质和幅度,使用不同商业运营炼钢技术的各种排放强度,使用拟议的CBAM责任模型和欧盟排放交易系统(EU ETS)中观察到的清算价格中的排放定价数据进行应用。此外,它还考察了与炼钢相关的关键商品的历史相关性,如欧盟碳配额、钢铁和黑色废钢,验证了一些分析师的观察结果,即欧盟排放交易系统的自由分配削弱了回收钢铁的动机。该研究确定了影响价格信号幅度和性质的因素,包括最终CBAM设计的不确定性、市场基本面和原料商品的影响、替代绿色钢铁技术以及长期前景与短期市场信号相比的相对重要性。研究发现,资源回收和回收将减少温室气体排放,反之亦然,这意味着精心设计的措施可以促进这两个目标。这对政策制定者和企业经理有影响,他们将能够集中稀缺资源来获取这些共同利益。这可以减轻监管负担,因为在以前的研究中,过度监管被认为是更好的废物管理实践的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信