How to overcome inter-electrode variability and instability to quantify dissolved oxygen, Fe(II), mn(II), and S(−II) in undisturbed soils and sediments using voltammetry

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Aaron J Slowey, Mark Marvin-DiPasquale
{"title":"How to overcome inter-electrode variability and instability to quantify dissolved oxygen, Fe(II), mn(II), and S(−II) in undisturbed soils and sediments using voltammetry","authors":"Aaron J Slowey,&nbsp;Mark Marvin-DiPasquale","doi":"10.1186/1467-4866-13-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although uniquely capable of measuring multiple redox constituents nearly simultaneously with no or minimal sample pretreatment, voltammetry is currently underutilized in characterizing redox conditions in aquatic and terrestrial systems. Investigation of undisturbed media such as pore water requires a solid-state electrode, and such electrodes can be difficult to fabricate reproducibly. An approach to determine the concentrations of electroactive constituents using indirectly calibrated electrodes has been developed, but the protocol for and accuracy of this approach—the pilot ion method—has not been documented in detail.</p><p>A detailed procedure for testing electrode quality is provided, and the application and limitations of the pilot ion method have been documented. To quantify Fe(II) and Mn(II), subtraction of non-linear baseline functions from voltammetric signals produced better calibration curves than did linear baselines, enabled lower detection limits and reliable deconvolution of overlapping signals, and was successfully applied to sediment pore water signals. We observed that electrode sensitivities often vary by tens of percent, and that the sensitivity declines over time. The ratio of calibration slopes of Mn(II) to Fe(II) varied by no more than 11% from one Hg/Au electrode to another and Fe(II) concentrations predicted by the Mn(II) pilot ion were, on average, 13% different from their actual values. However, concentration predictions by the pilot ion method were worse for less than 15?μM Fe(II) (46% different on average). The ratio of calibration slopes of Mn(II) to S(?II) varied by almost 20% from one Hg/Au electrode to another, and S(?II) predicted concentrations were as much as 58% different from their actual values. These predictions of Fe(II) and S(?II) concentrations indicate that the accuracy of the pilot ion method depends on how independent calibration slope ratios are from the electrode used. At medium-to-high concentration for the ocean, naturally derived dissolved organic carbon did not significantly affect the baseline-corrected electrode response of Mn(II) and Fe(II), but did significantly affect the response of S(?II).</p><p>Despite their intrinsic variability, Hg/Au electrodes fabricated by hand can be used to quantify O<sub>2</sub>, S(?II), Fe(II), and Mn(II) without calibrating every electrode for every constituent of interest. The pilot ion method can achieve accuracies to within 20% or less, provided that the underlying principle—the independence of slope ratios—is demonstrated for all voltammetric techniques used, and effects of the physicochemical properties of the system on voltammetric signals are addressed through baseline subtraction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12694,"journal":{"name":"Geochemical Transactions","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1467-4866-13-6","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochemical Transactions","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1467-4866-13-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Although uniquely capable of measuring multiple redox constituents nearly simultaneously with no or minimal sample pretreatment, voltammetry is currently underutilized in characterizing redox conditions in aquatic and terrestrial systems. Investigation of undisturbed media such as pore water requires a solid-state electrode, and such electrodes can be difficult to fabricate reproducibly. An approach to determine the concentrations of electroactive constituents using indirectly calibrated electrodes has been developed, but the protocol for and accuracy of this approach—the pilot ion method—has not been documented in detail.

A detailed procedure for testing electrode quality is provided, and the application and limitations of the pilot ion method have been documented. To quantify Fe(II) and Mn(II), subtraction of non-linear baseline functions from voltammetric signals produced better calibration curves than did linear baselines, enabled lower detection limits and reliable deconvolution of overlapping signals, and was successfully applied to sediment pore water signals. We observed that electrode sensitivities often vary by tens of percent, and that the sensitivity declines over time. The ratio of calibration slopes of Mn(II) to Fe(II) varied by no more than 11% from one Hg/Au electrode to another and Fe(II) concentrations predicted by the Mn(II) pilot ion were, on average, 13% different from their actual values. However, concentration predictions by the pilot ion method were worse for less than 15?μM Fe(II) (46% different on average). The ratio of calibration slopes of Mn(II) to S(?II) varied by almost 20% from one Hg/Au electrode to another, and S(?II) predicted concentrations were as much as 58% different from their actual values. These predictions of Fe(II) and S(?II) concentrations indicate that the accuracy of the pilot ion method depends on how independent calibration slope ratios are from the electrode used. At medium-to-high concentration for the ocean, naturally derived dissolved organic carbon did not significantly affect the baseline-corrected electrode response of Mn(II) and Fe(II), but did significantly affect the response of S(?II).

Despite their intrinsic variability, Hg/Au electrodes fabricated by hand can be used to quantify O2, S(?II), Fe(II), and Mn(II) without calibrating every electrode for every constituent of interest. The pilot ion method can achieve accuracies to within 20% or less, provided that the underlying principle—the independence of slope ratios—is demonstrated for all voltammetric techniques used, and effects of the physicochemical properties of the system on voltammetric signals are addressed through baseline subtraction.

Abstract Image

如何克服电极间的变异性和不稳定性,用伏安法量化未受干扰土壤和沉积物中的溶解氧、Fe(II)、mn(II)和S(−II)
虽然伏安法能够几乎同时测量多种氧化还原成分,而无需或只需少量的样品预处理,但目前在表征水生和陆地系统的氧化还原条件方面尚未得到充分利用。对未受干扰的介质(如孔隙水)的研究需要固态电极,而这种电极很难重复制造。已经开发了一种使用间接校准电极来确定电活性成分浓度的方法,但是该方法的协议和准确性-先导离子法-尚未详细记录。提供了测试电极质量的详细程序,并记录了导离子法的应用和局限性。为了量化Fe(II)和Mn(II),从伏安信号中减去非线性基线函数得到比线性基线更好的校准曲线,可以降低检测限和可靠地反卷积重叠信号,并成功应用于沉积物孔隙水信号。我们观察到电极的灵敏度通常变化百分之几十,并且灵敏度随时间而下降。在不同的Hg/Au电极上,Mn(II)与Fe(II)的校准斜率之比变化不超过11%,Mn(II)导导离子预测的Fe(II)浓度与实际值平均相差13%。然而,先导离子法的浓度预测在小于15?μM Fe(II)(平均差46%)。在不同的Hg/Au电极上,Mn(II)与S(II)的校准斜率之比变化了近20%,S(II)的预测浓度与实际值相差高达58%。这些对Fe(II)和S(II)浓度的预测表明,先导离子方法的准确性取决于所使用电极的校准斜率比的独立性。在海洋中-高浓度条件下,天然来源的溶解有机碳对Mn(II)和Fe(II)的基线校正电极响应没有显著影响,但对S(II)的响应有显著影响。尽管它们具有内在的可变性,但手工制作的Hg/Au电极可以用于量化O2, S(?II), Fe(II)和Mn(II),而无需为每个感兴趣的成分校准每个电极。先导离子方法可以达到20%或更低的精度,前提是所有使用的伏安技术都证明了基本原理-斜率的独立性,并且通过基线减法解决了系统的物理化学性质对伏安信号的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geochemical Transactions
Geochemical Transactions 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
2
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geochemical Transactions publishes high-quality research in all areas of chemistry as it relates to materials and processes occurring in terrestrial and extraterrestrial systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信