Photosensitivity and filter efficacy in albinism✰

IF 2.2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Tanja B. Hansen , Joaquim Torner-Jordana , Line Kessel
{"title":"Photosensitivity and filter efficacy in albinism✰","authors":"Tanja B. Hansen ,&nbsp;Joaquim Torner-Jordana ,&nbsp;Line Kessel","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2022.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To describe the prevalence and severity of photosensitivity in patients with albinism, and to compare with ocular features and how this correlated with use and choice of optical filters.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cross-sectional study on 81 participants with ocular or oculocutaneous albinism. An ophthalmic evaluation including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and evaluation of iris translucency and fundus hypopigmentation was performed. Participants were offered optical rehabilitation with testing of a wide panel of filters. The associations between ocular characteristics, subjective photosensitivity complaints, and filter choice were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Photosensitivity was rated as “some” to “worst imaginable” in 77.8% of participants. Severity of photosensitivity correlated significantly with fundus hypopigmentation (<em>p</em> = 0.04) but not with iris translucency (<em>p</em> = 0.14) and it was worse in those with poor visual acuity but there was no association between photosensitivity and contrast vision. Seventy-four new pairs of spectacles were prescribed in the study. All outdoor spectacles contained a filter, whereas 26.5% of new indoor spectacles did not. Relatively neutral filter colors (gray, brown or a combination of gray and brown with other colors) and low transmission were preferred.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Photosensitivity is common in albinism, but research targeting treatment is limited. Color and neutral filters with a low light transmission were preferred, with participants having a large number of spectacles, presumably to meet their needs in different situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 214-220"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429622000425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the prevalence and severity of photosensitivity in patients with albinism, and to compare with ocular features and how this correlated with use and choice of optical filters.

Methods

Cross-sectional study on 81 participants with ocular or oculocutaneous albinism. An ophthalmic evaluation including visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and evaluation of iris translucency and fundus hypopigmentation was performed. Participants were offered optical rehabilitation with testing of a wide panel of filters. The associations between ocular characteristics, subjective photosensitivity complaints, and filter choice were evaluated.

Results

Photosensitivity was rated as “some” to “worst imaginable” in 77.8% of participants. Severity of photosensitivity correlated significantly with fundus hypopigmentation (p = 0.04) but not with iris translucency (p = 0.14) and it was worse in those with poor visual acuity but there was no association between photosensitivity and contrast vision. Seventy-four new pairs of spectacles were prescribed in the study. All outdoor spectacles contained a filter, whereas 26.5% of new indoor spectacles did not. Relatively neutral filter colors (gray, brown or a combination of gray and brown with other colors) and low transmission were preferred.

Discussion

Photosensitivity is common in albinism, but research targeting treatment is limited. Color and neutral filters with a low light transmission were preferred, with participants having a large number of spectacles, presumably to meet their needs in different situations.

白化病的光敏性和滤镜效果
目的描述白化病患者光敏性的患病率和严重程度,并与眼部特征进行比较,以及这与滤光器的使用和选择之间的关系。方法对81例眼部或眼皮肤白化病患者进行横断面研究。进行了眼科评估,包括视力、对比敏感度以及虹膜半透明和眼底色素沉着不足的评估。为参与者提供了光学康复服务,并对一系列滤光器进行了测试。评估了眼部特征、主观光敏性主诉和滤镜选择之间的相关性。结果77.8%的受试者的感光度被评为“某些”至“最差”。光敏性的严重程度与眼底色素沉着不足显著相关(p=0.04),但与虹膜半透明性无关(p=0.014),在视力差的患者中情况更糟,但光敏性与对比视觉之间没有关联。研究中开了74副新眼镜。所有户外眼镜都含有滤镜,而26.5%的新型室内眼镜没有。相对中性的滤色器颜色(灰色、棕色或灰色和棕色与其他颜色的组合)和低透射率是优选的。讨论光敏性在白化病中很常见,但针对治疗的研究有限。优选具有低透光率的彩色和中性滤光片,参与者拥有大量眼镜,可能是为了满足他们在不同情况下的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信