Deterministic processes have limited impacts on foliar fungal endophyte communities along a savanna-forest successional gradient

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Mathew Andrew Harris , Martin Kemler , Bernard Slippers , Samantha-Leigh Jamison-Daniels , Frederick Witfeld , Monique Botha , Dominik Begerow , Andreas Brachmann , Michelle Greve
{"title":"Deterministic processes have limited impacts on foliar fungal endophyte communities along a savanna-forest successional gradient","authors":"Mathew Andrew Harris ,&nbsp;Martin Kemler ,&nbsp;Bernard Slippers ,&nbsp;Samantha-Leigh Jamison-Daniels ,&nbsp;Frederick Witfeld ,&nbsp;Monique Botha ,&nbsp;Dominik Begerow ,&nbsp;Andreas Brachmann ,&nbsp;Michelle Greve","doi":"10.1016/j.funeco.2023.101249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Patterns and drivers of succession provide insight into the mechanisms that govern community assembly, but remain poorly understood for microbial communities. We assess whether successional trends of trees are mirrored by foliar endophyte communities of three tree species across a deterministic woody successional gradient. Additionally, we test the relative contribution of abiotic predictors, biotic factors, and spatial distance between sites in predicting composition and richness of endophyte communities. Unlike the tree community, endophyte communities showed no consistent evidence of deterministic succession. Host identity was the most important factor structuring endophyte community composition; within hosts, spatial distance from the indigenous forest and between samples was important, while environmental predictors had small and inconsistent effects. Much variation in endophyte composition remained unexplained. In contrast, endophyte richness was well-explained by predictor variables. Host identity was most important in predicting endophyte richness, while the effect of other predictors on richness differed between host species. We conclude that deterministic succession in trees did not result in deterministic succession in endophyte communities; instead community assembly was most strongly influenced by host identity; while within hosts, neutral processes may be more important for endophyte assembly than deterministic factors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55136,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Ecology","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 101249"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1754504823000260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Patterns and drivers of succession provide insight into the mechanisms that govern community assembly, but remain poorly understood for microbial communities. We assess whether successional trends of trees are mirrored by foliar endophyte communities of three tree species across a deterministic woody successional gradient. Additionally, we test the relative contribution of abiotic predictors, biotic factors, and spatial distance between sites in predicting composition and richness of endophyte communities. Unlike the tree community, endophyte communities showed no consistent evidence of deterministic succession. Host identity was the most important factor structuring endophyte community composition; within hosts, spatial distance from the indigenous forest and between samples was important, while environmental predictors had small and inconsistent effects. Much variation in endophyte composition remained unexplained. In contrast, endophyte richness was well-explained by predictor variables. Host identity was most important in predicting endophyte richness, while the effect of other predictors on richness differed between host species. We conclude that deterministic succession in trees did not result in deterministic succession in endophyte communities; instead community assembly was most strongly influenced by host identity; while within hosts, neutral processes may be more important for endophyte assembly than deterministic factors.

确定性过程对热带稀树草原-森林演替梯度上叶内生真菌群落的影响有限
演替的模式和驱动因素提供了对控制群落聚集的机制的深入了解,但对微生物群落的了解仍然很少。我们评估了在确定的木质演替梯度上,三个树种的叶片内生菌群落是否反映了树木的演替趋势。此外,我们测试了非生物预测因子、生物因子和位点之间的空间距离在预测内生菌群落组成和丰富度方面的相对贡献。与树木群落不同,内生菌群落没有显示出确定性演替的一致证据。宿主身份是构建内生菌群落组成的最重要因素;在宿主体内,与本土森林的空间距离和样本之间的空间距离很重要,而环境预测因子的影响很小,而且不一致。内生菌组成的许多变化仍然无法解释。相反,内生菌丰富度可以通过预测变量很好地解释。宿主身份在预测内生菌丰富度方面最为重要,而其他预测因子对丰富度的影响因宿主物种而异。我们得出的结论是,树木的确定性演替并没有导致内生菌群落的确定性继任;相反,群落聚集受宿主身份的影响最为强烈;而在宿主体内,中性过程对内生菌的组装可能比确定性因素更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fungal Ecology
Fungal Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Fungal Ecology publishes investigations into all aspects of fungal ecology, including the following (not exclusive): population dynamics; adaptation; evolution; role in ecosystem functioning, nutrient cycling, decomposition, carbon allocation; ecophysiology; intra- and inter-specific mycelial interactions, fungus-plant (pathogens, mycorrhizas, lichens, endophytes), fungus-invertebrate and fungus-microbe interaction; genomics and (evolutionary) genetics; conservation and biodiversity; remote sensing; bioremediation and biodegradation; quantitative and computational aspects - modelling, indicators, complexity, informatics. The usual prerequisites for publication will be originality, clarity, and significance as relevant to a better understanding of the ecology of fungi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信