The pipetting Olympics: Propagating proper pipetting a priori in clinical LC-MS/MS analysis

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Matthew L. Crawford, Christopher M. Shuford, Russell P. Grant
{"title":"The pipetting Olympics: Propagating proper pipetting a priori in clinical LC-MS/MS analysis","authors":"Matthew L. Crawford,&nbsp;Christopher M. Shuford,&nbsp;Russell P. Grant","doi":"10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Engaging pipetting events were developed to assess and challenge technicians’ practical sample handling using matrices common to the clinical laboratory. As correct pipetting stands as a prerequisite for accurate clinical laboratory testing, this helped to understand sources of imprecision and bias attributed to the underlying step of aspirating and dispensing patient samples and internal standard in clinical LC-MS/MS assays while highlighting the importance for the clinical laboratory to evaluate this source of variability on an on-going basis and mitigate its impact.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The events involved pipetting water, methanol, serum, and whole blood. Gravimetric analysis was used to determine the exact volumetric delivery of each matrix using two different techniques. Imprecision and bias were calculated based on the volume derived from the mass and density of each matrix, using literature values for each matrix type.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Low imprecision and bias were observed when pipetting water, as in common commercial pipetting assessment programs. Significantly increased imprecision and bias were observed in more applicable matrices (i.e., serum, whole blood, and methanol), indicating that water-based pipetting proficiency assessment leads to a false sense of technical ability. Additionally, the events within illuminated areas for training, leading to improved imprecision and bias. It was shown that pre-rinsing (aspirating and dispensing matrix three times to coat the tip) improved bias, particularly for delivery of methanol and whole blood.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Precise and accurate pipetting within the clinical laboratory should not be taken for granted, nor implicitly inferred from proficiency assessment using aqueous solutions. The engaging and collegial events fostered training opportunities. Assay-specific patient sample delivery considerations (pipets and matrices) can inform the practicality of these events – the Pipetting Olympics – and drive improvements within the laboratory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","volume":"29 ","pages":"Pages 16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667145X23000287","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Engaging pipetting events were developed to assess and challenge technicians’ practical sample handling using matrices common to the clinical laboratory. As correct pipetting stands as a prerequisite for accurate clinical laboratory testing, this helped to understand sources of imprecision and bias attributed to the underlying step of aspirating and dispensing patient samples and internal standard in clinical LC-MS/MS assays while highlighting the importance for the clinical laboratory to evaluate this source of variability on an on-going basis and mitigate its impact.

Methods

The events involved pipetting water, methanol, serum, and whole blood. Gravimetric analysis was used to determine the exact volumetric delivery of each matrix using two different techniques. Imprecision and bias were calculated based on the volume derived from the mass and density of each matrix, using literature values for each matrix type.

Results

Low imprecision and bias were observed when pipetting water, as in common commercial pipetting assessment programs. Significantly increased imprecision and bias were observed in more applicable matrices (i.e., serum, whole blood, and methanol), indicating that water-based pipetting proficiency assessment leads to a false sense of technical ability. Additionally, the events within illuminated areas for training, leading to improved imprecision and bias. It was shown that pre-rinsing (aspirating and dispensing matrix three times to coat the tip) improved bias, particularly for delivery of methanol and whole blood.

Conclusions

Precise and accurate pipetting within the clinical laboratory should not be taken for granted, nor implicitly inferred from proficiency assessment using aqueous solutions. The engaging and collegial events fostered training opportunities. Assay-specific patient sample delivery considerations (pipets and matrices) can inform the practicality of these events – the Pipetting Olympics – and drive improvements within the laboratory.

移液奥林匹克:在临床LC-MS/MS分析中推广适当的先验移液
引言开展吸引人的移液活动是为了评估和挑战技术人员使用临床实验室常见基质的实际样品处理。由于正确的移液是准确的临床实验室测试的先决条件,这有助于了解临床LC-MS/MS分析中抽吸和分配患者样本的基本步骤和内部标准导致的不精确性和偏差的来源,同时强调临床实验室持续评估这种变异性来源并减轻其影响的重要性。方法事件包括移液、甲醇、血清和全血。使用两种不同的技术,使用重量分析来确定每个基质的精确体积输送。根据每种基质的质量和密度得出的体积,使用每种基质类型的文献值计算不精确性和偏差。结果与常见的商业移液评估程序一样,移液时观察到较低的不精确性和偏差。在更适用的基质(即血清、全血和甲醇)中观察到显著增加的不精确性和偏差,表明水基移液能力评估会导致技术能力的错误感觉。此外,在训练的照明区域内的事件,导致不精确性和偏差的改善。研究表明,预冲洗(抽吸和分配基质三次以覆盖尖端)改善了偏差,特别是在输送甲醇和全血时。结论临床实验室内精确准确的移液不应被视为理所当然,也不应从使用水溶液的能力评估中隐含推断。参与式和学院式活动促进了培训机会。化验特定的患者样本输送考虑因素(移液管和基质)可以为这些活动(移液奥运会)的实用性提供信息,并推动实验室内的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab
Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab Health Professions-Medical Laboratory Technology
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
41
审稿时长
81 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信