Saurabh Singh , Ramesh Kannan Kandasami , Tejas G. Murthy , Matthew Richard Coop
{"title":"On the modelling of stress-dilatancy behavior in weakly cemented sands","authors":"Saurabh Singh , Ramesh Kannan Kandasami , Tejas G. Murthy , Matthew Richard Coop","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A comprehensive study on the stress-dilatancy behavior of cemented sand and its modeling is presented. The effect of confining pressure, relative density, and cement content on stress-dilatancy behavior are studied from the published experimental results and an additional series of experiments performed in this study. To facilitate a contrast and comparison of stress-dilatancy behavior between these datasets, a normalized stress ratio is proposed which removes the effect of mineralogy and morphology of parent sand. A set of key insights were obtained from this comparative study which aided in improving the stress-dilatancy relation; for example, the effect of initial conditions on stress-dilatancy behavior was found to be captured by the ratio of cohesion intercept (or tensile strength) and mean effective stress before shearing. The limitations of stress transformation, often used in modelling of cemented sand, were also systematically studied by a set of carefully designed experiments; it was found to be only applicable before gross yielding of cementation. After gross yielding, it is necessary to take in account of the breakage of bonds/cementation. The gross yield locus was identified from 70 experimental datasets and a cohesion/bond degradation model was formulated to model the stress-dilatancy behavior of cemented sand. The efficacy of stress-dilatancy relations (after including the gross yield locus and bond degradation behavior) is evaluated from the experimental results; the Rowe's stress-dilatancy relation was found to be most suitable with the proposed bond/cohesion degradation model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080623000574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A comprehensive study on the stress-dilatancy behavior of cemented sand and its modeling is presented. The effect of confining pressure, relative density, and cement content on stress-dilatancy behavior are studied from the published experimental results and an additional series of experiments performed in this study. To facilitate a contrast and comparison of stress-dilatancy behavior between these datasets, a normalized stress ratio is proposed which removes the effect of mineralogy and morphology of parent sand. A set of key insights were obtained from this comparative study which aided in improving the stress-dilatancy relation; for example, the effect of initial conditions on stress-dilatancy behavior was found to be captured by the ratio of cohesion intercept (or tensile strength) and mean effective stress before shearing. The limitations of stress transformation, often used in modelling of cemented sand, were also systematically studied by a set of carefully designed experiments; it was found to be only applicable before gross yielding of cementation. After gross yielding, it is necessary to take in account of the breakage of bonds/cementation. The gross yield locus was identified from 70 experimental datasets and a cohesion/bond degradation model was formulated to model the stress-dilatancy behavior of cemented sand. The efficacy of stress-dilatancy relations (after including the gross yield locus and bond degradation behavior) is evaluated from the experimental results; the Rowe's stress-dilatancy relation was found to be most suitable with the proposed bond/cohesion degradation model.
期刊介绍:
Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020.
Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.