Effect of particle size and particle size distribution on the post-liquefaction strength of granular soils

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Mathan V. Manmatharajan , Edouardine-Pascale Ingabire , Alex Sy , Mason Ghafghazi
{"title":"Effect of particle size and particle size distribution on the post-liquefaction strength of granular soils","authors":"Mathan V. Manmatharajan ,&nbsp;Edouardine-Pascale Ingabire ,&nbsp;Alex Sy ,&nbsp;Mason Ghafghazi","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In practice, post-liquefaction strength is largely determined from case histories, but the case history database is limited and there are gaps in the information available in each case. As a result, laboratory tests have continued to play a key role in determining how various factors influence post-liquefaction strength. This paper presents an investigation into how factors such as particle size, particle size distribution, fines content, and compressibility influence post-liquefaction strength in simple shear tests. Eleven particle size distributions of a natural soil and a tailings material, ranging from silt to fine gravel, were studied. The results were compared with case histories.</p><p>Materials of different geologic origins have meaningfully different post-liquefaction strengths. Particle size and particle size distributions were both found to significantly affect post-liquefaction response as well. Post-liquefaction strengths obtained from simple shear tests agreed well with those back calculated from case histories. Laboratory testing can be utilized to determine how the post-liquefaction strength of a given material may compare to the case history database, and can be used to guide design decisions. This is an important practical finding, given the sparse case history database.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080623000653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In practice, post-liquefaction strength is largely determined from case histories, but the case history database is limited and there are gaps in the information available in each case. As a result, laboratory tests have continued to play a key role in determining how various factors influence post-liquefaction strength. This paper presents an investigation into how factors such as particle size, particle size distribution, fines content, and compressibility influence post-liquefaction strength in simple shear tests. Eleven particle size distributions of a natural soil and a tailings material, ranging from silt to fine gravel, were studied. The results were compared with case histories.

Materials of different geologic origins have meaningfully different post-liquefaction strengths. Particle size and particle size distributions were both found to significantly affect post-liquefaction response as well. Post-liquefaction strengths obtained from simple shear tests agreed well with those back calculated from case histories. Laboratory testing can be utilized to determine how the post-liquefaction strength of a given material may compare to the case history database, and can be used to guide design decisions. This is an important practical finding, given the sparse case history database.

粒径及粒径分布对颗粒土液化后强度的影响
在实践中,液化后强度在很大程度上是由案例历史确定的,但案例历史数据库是有限的,并且在每种情况下可用的信息都存在差距。因此,实验室试验在确定各种因素如何影响液化后强度方面继续发挥着关键作用。本文研究了颗粒尺寸、颗粒尺寸分布、细粒含量和压缩性等因素如何影响简单剪切试验中的液化后强度。研究了从淤泥到细砾石的天然土壤和尾矿材料的11种粒度分布。将结果与病例史进行比较。不同地质来源的材料具有显著不同的液化后强度。颗粒尺寸和颗粒尺寸分布也显著影响液化后的反应。从简单剪切试验中获得的液化后强度与从案例历史中反向计算的强度一致。实验室测试可用于确定给定材料的液化后强度如何与案例历史数据库进行比较,并可用于指导设计决策。考虑到稀疏的病例历史数据库,这是一个重要的实际发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信