Don’t go on holiday in August! Market reaction to an unexpected windfall tax on banks

IF 2.1 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Antonio De Vito , Livia Pancotto , Salvatore Perdichizzi , Alessio Reghezza
{"title":"Don’t go on holiday in August! Market reaction to an unexpected windfall tax on banks","authors":"Antonio De Vito ,&nbsp;Livia Pancotto ,&nbsp;Salvatore Perdichizzi ,&nbsp;Alessio Reghezza","doi":"10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Using an event study approach, this paper investigates the stock market reaction to the unexpected announcement of a </span>windfall<span> tax on banks’ extra profits. We show that investors negatively perceive the introduction of the tax, with more pronounced reactions for banks expected to be more highly burdened. This evidence is corroborated when we investigate the cross-sectional determinants of banks’ returns and cumulative abnormal returns. Overall, the results suggest that investors negatively price excess profits taxes and contribute to our understanding of how stock markets respond to tax policy changes.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":11468,"journal":{"name":"Economics Letters","volume":"233 ","pages":"Article 111407"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176523004330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Using an event study approach, this paper investigates the stock market reaction to the unexpected announcement of a windfall tax on banks’ extra profits. We show that investors negatively perceive the introduction of the tax, with more pronounced reactions for banks expected to be more highly burdened. This evidence is corroborated when we investigate the cross-sectional determinants of banks’ returns and cumulative abnormal returns. Overall, the results suggest that investors negatively price excess profits taxes and contribute to our understanding of how stock markets respond to tax policy changes.

不要在八月去度假!市场对银行意外征收暴利税的反应
本文采用事件研究方法,研究了股票市场对银行额外利润意外征收暴利税的反应。我们发现,投资者对该税的引入持负面看法,预计银行将承担更高的负担。当我们研究银行回报和累积异常回报的横截面决定因素时,这一证据得到了证实。总体而言,研究结果表明,投资者对超额利润税的定价是负面的,这有助于我们理解股市如何应对税收政策变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Economics Letters
Economics Letters ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
348
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Many economists today are concerned by the proliferation of journals and the concomitant labyrinth of research to be conquered in order to reach the specific information they require. To combat this tendency, Economics Letters has been conceived and designed outside the realm of the traditional economics journal. As a Letters Journal, it consists of concise communications (letters) that provide a means of rapid and efficient dissemination of new results, models and methods in all fields of economic research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信