Christopher Proud , Shu Fukai , Brian Dunn , Tina Dunn , Jaquie Mitchell
{"title":"Effect of nitrogen management on grain yield of rice grown in a high-yielding environment under flooded and non-flooded conditions","authors":"Christopher Proud , Shu Fukai , Brian Dunn , Tina Dunn , Jaquie Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/j.crope.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With increased cost and scarcity of irrigation water, flooded rice growing system may need to be replaced with water-saving technologies which includes part or complete removal of flooding and to be replaced with non-flooded aerobic conditions. However, to maintain high grain yield equivalent to that achieved with flooded rice, nitrogen (N) management may need to be modified. Experiments were conducted in a high-yielding environment with total N applied up to 180 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> and three application times to determine its effect on N uptake, grain yield and grain protein content of rice grown under aerobic (AR), delayed permanent water (DPW) and flooded (FD) conditions. Grain yield increased by 3.50–4.50 t ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> with total N application rate of 180 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in AR and 120 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in both DPW and FD. Maximum yield was about 10.5, 12.0 and 13.0 t ha<sup>−1</sup> in AR, DPW and FD, respectively, and the difference was mostly reflected in the grain yield difference obtained under 0 N application. Apparent recovery of fertilised N and agronomic N use efficiency were similar between AR and FD, but DPW took up a higher proportion of N fertiliser applied before commencement of flooding and had slightly higher grain yield response to total N application up to 120 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>. It is concluded that the limitation for grain yield for rice grown in the AR condition was the crop's inability to take up N from the soil, rather than the inability to take up N fertiliser or to convert the N uptake to grain yield.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100340,"journal":{"name":"Crop and Environment","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773126X23000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
With increased cost and scarcity of irrigation water, flooded rice growing system may need to be replaced with water-saving technologies which includes part or complete removal of flooding and to be replaced with non-flooded aerobic conditions. However, to maintain high grain yield equivalent to that achieved with flooded rice, nitrogen (N) management may need to be modified. Experiments were conducted in a high-yielding environment with total N applied up to 180 kg ha−1 and three application times to determine its effect on N uptake, grain yield and grain protein content of rice grown under aerobic (AR), delayed permanent water (DPW) and flooded (FD) conditions. Grain yield increased by 3.50–4.50 t ha−1 with total N application rate of 180 kg ha−1 in AR and 120 kg ha−1 in both DPW and FD. Maximum yield was about 10.5, 12.0 and 13.0 t ha−1 in AR, DPW and FD, respectively, and the difference was mostly reflected in the grain yield difference obtained under 0 N application. Apparent recovery of fertilised N and agronomic N use efficiency were similar between AR and FD, but DPW took up a higher proportion of N fertiliser applied before commencement of flooding and had slightly higher grain yield response to total N application up to 120 kg ha−1. It is concluded that the limitation for grain yield for rice grown in the AR condition was the crop's inability to take up N from the soil, rather than the inability to take up N fertiliser or to convert the N uptake to grain yield.