Effect of nitrogen management on grain yield of rice grown in a high-yielding environment under flooded and non-flooded conditions

Christopher Proud , Shu Fukai , Brian Dunn , Tina Dunn , Jaquie Mitchell
{"title":"Effect of nitrogen management on grain yield of rice grown in a high-yielding environment under flooded and non-flooded conditions","authors":"Christopher Proud ,&nbsp;Shu Fukai ,&nbsp;Brian Dunn ,&nbsp;Tina Dunn ,&nbsp;Jaquie Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/j.crope.2023.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>With increased cost and scarcity of irrigation water, flooded rice growing system may need to be replaced with water-saving technologies which includes part or complete removal of flooding and to be replaced with non-flooded aerobic conditions. However, to maintain high grain yield equivalent to that achieved with flooded rice, nitrogen (N) management may need to be modified. Experiments were conducted in a high-yielding environment with total N applied up to 180 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup> and three application times to determine its effect on N uptake, grain yield and grain protein content of rice grown under aerobic (AR), delayed permanent water (DPW) and flooded (FD) conditions. Grain yield increased by 3.50–4.50 ​t ha<sup>−</sup><sup>1</sup> with total N application rate of 180 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup> in AR and 120 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup> in both DPW and FD. Maximum yield was about 10.5, 12.0 and 13.0 ​t ​ha<sup>−1</sup> in AR, DPW and FD, respectively, and the difference was mostly reflected in the grain yield difference obtained under 0 N application. Apparent recovery of fertilised N and agronomic N use efficiency were similar between AR and FD, but DPW took up a higher proportion of N fertiliser applied before commencement of flooding and had slightly higher grain yield response to total N application up to 120 ​kg ​ha<sup>−1</sup>. It is concluded that the limitation for grain yield for rice grown in the AR condition was the crop's inability to take up N from the soil, rather than the inability to take up N fertiliser or to convert the N uptake to grain yield.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100340,"journal":{"name":"Crop and Environment","volume":"2 1","pages":"Pages 37-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773126X23000059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

With increased cost and scarcity of irrigation water, flooded rice growing system may need to be replaced with water-saving technologies which includes part or complete removal of flooding and to be replaced with non-flooded aerobic conditions. However, to maintain high grain yield equivalent to that achieved with flooded rice, nitrogen (N) management may need to be modified. Experiments were conducted in a high-yielding environment with total N applied up to 180 ​kg ​ha−1 and three application times to determine its effect on N uptake, grain yield and grain protein content of rice grown under aerobic (AR), delayed permanent water (DPW) and flooded (FD) conditions. Grain yield increased by 3.50–4.50 ​t ha1 with total N application rate of 180 ​kg ​ha−1 in AR and 120 ​kg ​ha−1 in both DPW and FD. Maximum yield was about 10.5, 12.0 and 13.0 ​t ​ha−1 in AR, DPW and FD, respectively, and the difference was mostly reflected in the grain yield difference obtained under 0 N application. Apparent recovery of fertilised N and agronomic N use efficiency were similar between AR and FD, but DPW took up a higher proportion of N fertiliser applied before commencement of flooding and had slightly higher grain yield response to total N application up to 120 ​kg ​ha−1. It is concluded that the limitation for grain yield for rice grown in the AR condition was the crop's inability to take up N from the soil, rather than the inability to take up N fertiliser or to convert the N uptake to grain yield.

氮肥管理对水涝和非水涝高产水稻产量的影响
随着成本的增加和灌溉水的稀缺,可能需要用节水技术取代淹水的水稻种植系统,节水技术包括部分或全部消除淹水,并用非淹水的好氧条件取代。然而,为了保持与淹水水稻相当的高粮食产量,可能需要修改氮管理。实验是在高产环境中进行的,施氮总量高达180​kg​ha−1和三次施用,以确定其对好氧(AR)、延迟永久水(DPW)和淹水(FD)条件下生长的水稻的氮吸收、籽粒产量和籽粒蛋白质含量的影响。粮食产量增加3.50–4.50​t ha−1,总施氮率为180​kg​ha−1在AR和120中​kg​DPW和FD中的ha−1。最大产量分别为10.5、12.0和13.0​t​ha−1在AR、DPW和FD中的差异,并且这种差异主要反映在0 N施用下获得的籽粒产量差异上。施肥氮的表观回收率和农艺氮利用效率在AR和FD之间相似,但DPW在洪水开始前施用的氮肥比例更高,对总施氮的产量响应略高,最高可达120​kg​ha−1。得出的结论是,在AR条件下种植的水稻的粮食产量限制是作物无法从土壤中吸收氮,而不是无法吸收氮肥或将氮吸收转化为粮食产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信