Influence of the position of the distal pressure measurement point on the Fractional Flow Reserve using in-silico simulations

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Rafael Agujetas , Conrado Ferrera , Reyes González-Fernández , Juan M. Nogales-Asensio , Ana Fernández-Tena
{"title":"Influence of the position of the distal pressure measurement point on the Fractional Flow Reserve using in-silico simulations","authors":"Rafael Agujetas ,&nbsp;Conrado Ferrera ,&nbsp;Reyes González-Fernández ,&nbsp;Juan M. Nogales-Asensio ,&nbsp;Ana Fernández-Tena","doi":"10.1016/j.bbe.2022.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Coronary stenosis is mainly responsible for myocardial ischemia as the blood supply to a portion of the heart stops or is severely reduced. The Fractional Flow Reserve is the benchmark for the </span>hemodynamic significance assessment of coronary stenoses. Its value is employed as a gatekeeper/planning tool for revascularization in clinical practice.</p><p>Non-invasive alternatives have been successfully proposed to guide cardiologists. However, simulation values are not accurate enough in the 0.75–0.85 range, so invasive Fractional Flow Reserve should be used.</p><p>Several authors argue about where distal pressure should be measured. Therefore, our aim is to use simulation to assess how this value changes and to detect the correct measurement region.</p><p>First, we have adjusted the simulation method to the segmentations of two patients whose invasive Fractional Flow Reserve is known. We then extended our analysis to four patients and obtained the simulated value at multiple points distal to the stenosis. This is an advantage over invasive measurements, whose locations are restricted. The results are also essential for locating the best region for invasive distal pressure measurements.</p><p>We propose a hybrid invasive and in-silico procedure that would avoid false results and prevent cardiologists from making erroneous clinical decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55381,"journal":{"name":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0208521622001024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronary stenosis is mainly responsible for myocardial ischemia as the blood supply to a portion of the heart stops or is severely reduced. The Fractional Flow Reserve is the benchmark for the hemodynamic significance assessment of coronary stenoses. Its value is employed as a gatekeeper/planning tool for revascularization in clinical practice.

Non-invasive alternatives have been successfully proposed to guide cardiologists. However, simulation values are not accurate enough in the 0.75–0.85 range, so invasive Fractional Flow Reserve should be used.

Several authors argue about where distal pressure should be measured. Therefore, our aim is to use simulation to assess how this value changes and to detect the correct measurement region.

First, we have adjusted the simulation method to the segmentations of two patients whose invasive Fractional Flow Reserve is known. We then extended our analysis to four patients and obtained the simulated value at multiple points distal to the stenosis. This is an advantage over invasive measurements, whose locations are restricted. The results are also essential for locating the best region for invasive distal pressure measurements.

We propose a hybrid invasive and in-silico procedure that would avoid false results and prevent cardiologists from making erroneous clinical decisions.

远端压力测量点位置对分流储备的影响
冠状动脉狭窄是心肌缺血的主要原因,因为部分心脏的血液供应停止或严重减少。血流储备分数是冠状动脉狭窄血液动力学显著性评估的基准。它的价值被用作临床实践中血运重建的看门人/规划工具。已经成功地提出了非侵入性替代方案来指导心脏病专家。然而,模拟值在0.75–0.85范围内不够准确,因此应使用侵入性分数流量储备。一些作者争论远端压力应该在哪里测量。因此,我们的目标是使用模拟来评估该值如何变化,并检测正确的测量区域。首先,我们将模拟方法调整为已知有创血流储备分数的两名患者的分段。然后,我们将分析扩展到四名患者,并在狭窄远端的多个点获得模拟值。这是相对于侵入性测量的优势,侵入性测量位置受到限制。这些结果对于定位有创远端压力测量的最佳区域也是至关重要的。我们提出了一种侵入性和电子手术相结合的方法,可以避免错误的结果,并防止心脏病专家做出错误的临床决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
77
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering is a quarterly journal, founded in 1981, devoted to publishing the results of original, innovative and creative research investigations in the field of Biocybernetics and biomedical engineering, which bridges mathematical, physical, chemical and engineering methods and technology to analyse physiological processes in living organisms as well as to develop methods, devices and systems used in biology and medicine, mainly in medical diagnosis, monitoring systems and therapy. The Journal''s mission is to advance scientific discovery into new or improved standards of care, and promotion a wide-ranging exchange between science and its application to humans.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信