Use of tocilizumab in COVID-19 pneumonia hospitalized patients. Cohort study

Cynthia Anci , Vanina Solavallone , Romina Cardone , Juan Manuel Orlando
{"title":"Use of tocilizumab in COVID-19 pneumonia hospitalized patients. Cohort study","authors":"Cynthia Anci ,&nbsp;Vanina Solavallone ,&nbsp;Romina Cardone ,&nbsp;Juan Manuel Orlando","doi":"10.1016/j.acci.2022.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In COVID 19, an aggressive inflammatory response called cytokine release storm has been described. It is mainly mediated by the activation of Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), mainly observed in critically ill patients. Among the multiple treatments proposed throughout these two years of pandemic, we highlight the use of Tocilizumab (TCZ).</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate in-hospital mortality, transfer to critical care unit (CCU), invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (IMV), and hospital stay in patients treated with TCZ versus conventional treatments (CT).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Retrospective, descriptive, and analytical cohort study. Hospitalized patients, May to July 2021. Branches: treated with TCZ versus CT. Statistical analysis: Epi Info 7.2.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Ninety patients, 51 TCZ branch and 39 CT branch. Age 48.2 years (± 11.7), males 74 (82.2%). Comorbidities 66 (73.3%): High blood pressure (HBP) 32 (35.6%), Diabetes mellitus 13 (14.4%), BMI<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->30, 51 (56.7%). Medical Clinic Admission (MC) 85 (94.4%). Days post-symptom onset 7.9 (± 2.6). Severity of COVID 19: severe 61 (67.8%), critical 26 (28.9%). CCU admission 26 (29.9%). IMV 16 (17.8%). Deaths 7 (7.9%). Hospital stay 12.9 (± 6.6) days. Comparative analysis TCZ versus CT: MC admission 50 (98%) versus 35 (89.7%) <em>p</em> .08. CCU admission 12 (23.5%) versus 14 (38.9%) <em>p</em> .1. IMV 4 (7.8%) versus 12 (30.8%) <em>p</em> .005. Death 1 (2.0%) versus 6 (15.8%) <em>p</em> .02. Mortality in univariate analysis (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.05): APACHE II, BMI<!--> <!-->&gt;<!--> <!-->30, TCZ, IMV, and CCU admission. TCZ was a protective factor against RR of death .86 (.74–.99). The IMV requirement was a RR factor for death 2.0 (1.23–3.42). Cox logistic regression, independent survival factors: use of TCZ, absence of obesity, and no IMV, <em>p</em> .0000.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>IMV was found to be a risk factor for mortality. TCZ did not show a decrease in CCU requirement, but it did prove to be a protective factor against mortality. However, this is a non-randomized study so it should be interpreted with caution.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100016,"journal":{"name":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 105-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0122726222000854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In COVID 19, an aggressive inflammatory response called cytokine release storm has been described. It is mainly mediated by the activation of Interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), mainly observed in critically ill patients. Among the multiple treatments proposed throughout these two years of pandemic, we highlight the use of Tocilizumab (TCZ).

Objectives

To evaluate in-hospital mortality, transfer to critical care unit (CCU), invasive mechanical ventilation requirement (IMV), and hospital stay in patients treated with TCZ versus conventional treatments (CT).

Methods

Retrospective, descriptive, and analytical cohort study. Hospitalized patients, May to July 2021. Branches: treated with TCZ versus CT. Statistical analysis: Epi Info 7.2.

Results

Ninety patients, 51 TCZ branch and 39 CT branch. Age 48.2 years (± 11.7), males 74 (82.2%). Comorbidities 66 (73.3%): High blood pressure (HBP) 32 (35.6%), Diabetes mellitus 13 (14.4%), BMI > 30, 51 (56.7%). Medical Clinic Admission (MC) 85 (94.4%). Days post-symptom onset 7.9 (± 2.6). Severity of COVID 19: severe 61 (67.8%), critical 26 (28.9%). CCU admission 26 (29.9%). IMV 16 (17.8%). Deaths 7 (7.9%). Hospital stay 12.9 (± 6.6) days. Comparative analysis TCZ versus CT: MC admission 50 (98%) versus 35 (89.7%) p .08. CCU admission 12 (23.5%) versus 14 (38.9%) p .1. IMV 4 (7.8%) versus 12 (30.8%) p .005. Death 1 (2.0%) versus 6 (15.8%) p .02. Mortality in univariate analysis (p < .05): APACHE II, BMI > 30, TCZ, IMV, and CCU admission. TCZ was a protective factor against RR of death .86 (.74–.99). The IMV requirement was a RR factor for death 2.0 (1.23–3.42). Cox logistic regression, independent survival factors: use of TCZ, absence of obesity, and no IMV, p .0000.

Conclusions

IMV was found to be a risk factor for mortality. TCZ did not show a decrease in CCU requirement, but it did prove to be a protective factor against mortality. However, this is a non-randomized study so it should be interpreted with caution.

托珠单抗在COVID-19肺炎住院患者中的应用队列研究
引言在2019冠状病毒病中,有人描述了一种称为细胞因子释放风暴的侵袭性炎症反应。它主要由白细胞介素6(IL-6)和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)的激活介导,主要在危重患者中观察到。在这两年的疫情期间提出的多种治疗方法中,我们强调了托奇利珠单抗(TCZ)的使用。目的评估TCZ与传统治疗(CT)相比患者的住院死亡率、转入重症监护室(CCU)、有创机械通气要求(IMV)和住院时间,和分析性队列研究。住院患者,2021年5月至7月。分支:TCZ与CT治疗。统计分析:Epi Info 7.2.结果90例患者,TCZ分支51例,CT分支39例。年龄48.2岁(±11.7),男性74岁(82.2%)。合并症66例(73.3%):高血压32例(35.6%),糖尿病13例(14.4%),BMI>0.05;30,51(56.7%)。门诊入院(MC)85(94.4%)。症状出现后7.9(±2.6)天。新冠肺炎严重程度19:严重61(67.8%),危重26(28.9%)。CCU入院26(29.9%)。IMV 16(17.8%)。死亡7(7.9%)。住院12.9(±6.6)天。比较分析TCZ与CT:MC入院50例(98%)与35例(89.7%)p。CCU入院12例(23.5%)与14例(38.9%)比较。IMV 4(7.8%)对12(30.8%)p。005。死亡1例(2.0%)对6例(15.8%)第02页。单变量分析中的死亡率(p<;.05):APACHE II,BMI>;30、TCZ、IMV和CCU准入。TCZ是对死亡RR的保护因素。86(.74-.99)。IMV要求是死亡RR 2.0(1.23-3.42)。Cox逻辑回归,独立生存因素:使用TCZ、没有肥胖和没有IMV,p。0000。结论IMV是死亡的风险因素。TCZ并没有显示出CCU需求的减少,但它确实被证明是一个防止死亡的保护因素。然而,这是一项非随机研究,因此应谨慎解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信