A novel approach for assessing osteoporosis utilizing DXA, HU and VBQ

Wei Xu , Yifan Li , Xiangyang Zhang , Liwei Chen , Silian Wang , Yi Wang , Wenjun Liu , Ruijun Xu , Xiaojian Ye , Chi Zhang , Zhikun Li
{"title":"A novel approach for assessing osteoporosis utilizing DXA, HU and VBQ","authors":"Wei Xu ,&nbsp;Yifan Li ,&nbsp;Xiangyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Liwei Chen ,&nbsp;Silian Wang ,&nbsp;Yi Wang ,&nbsp;Wenjun Liu ,&nbsp;Ruijun Xu ,&nbsp;Xiaojian Ye ,&nbsp;Chi Zhang ,&nbsp;Zhikun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.bmt.2023.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To precisely assess preoperative osteoporosis in patients, a more precise method for evaluating osteoporosis is being developed to better guide the use of bone cement reinforced screws.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent posterior lumbar decompression and fusion internal fixation at Shanghai Tongren Hospital.The general information, bone mineral density assessment data, Fracture risk prediction rate(WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)), and whether to use cement reinforced screws were collected. Definition of combination method: T value ​&lt; ​−2.5 or HU value ​&lt; ​110 or VBQ &gt;3.5.The diagnostic rates of osteoporosis were compared between dual energy x-ray absorptiometry(DXA), Hounsfield Units(HU), Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ), National Bone Health Alliance(NBHA), and combination methods, and the correlation between different methods was analyzed. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the significant influencing factors of the use of cement-reinforced screws.</p></div><div><h3>Result</h3><p>A total of 178 patients were enrolled in the study, aged 65.73 ​± ​14.43 years, 121 female, 57 male, Body Mass Index(BMI) was 22.88 ​± ​3.52, 57 (32.0%) used cement reinforced screws, and 14 (7.9%) had previous fracture history.The diagnostic rates of osteoporosis by DXA, HU, VBQ, NBHA and combination method were 22.5% (40/178), 47.2% (84/178), 56.2% (100/178), 64.0% (114/178) and 75.8% (135/178), respectively.HU, VBQ, NBHA, and combination methods were significantly different from DXA in the diagnosis rate of osteoporosis (P ​&lt; ​0.001). Binary Logistics regression showed that age, T value, HU value, and VBQ value significantly influenced bone cement screw use, and the odds ratio of VBQ was 4.315. The prediction accuracy of the regression equation was 90.4%, the area under the receiver operator characteristic(ROC) curve was 0.974, and the Youden index was 0.830.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Currently, the DXA method widely used for diagnosing osteoporosis yields false negative results and there are significant discrepancies among different diagnostic methods. The combined approach exhibits a higher detection rate (75.8%). Age, T value, HU value, and VBQ value significantly influence the use of cement screws with a regression equation accuracy of 90.4%. Cement-reinforced screws are recommended when osteoporosis is determined by a combination method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100180,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Technology","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 102-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949723X23000521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To precisely assess preoperative osteoporosis in patients, a more precise method for evaluating osteoporosis is being developed to better guide the use of bone cement reinforced screws.

Method

The retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent posterior lumbar decompression and fusion internal fixation at Shanghai Tongren Hospital.The general information, bone mineral density assessment data, Fracture risk prediction rate(WHO Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX)), and whether to use cement reinforced screws were collected. Definition of combination method: T value ​< ​−2.5 or HU value ​< ​110 or VBQ >3.5.The diagnostic rates of osteoporosis were compared between dual energy x-ray absorptiometry(DXA), Hounsfield Units(HU), Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ), National Bone Health Alliance(NBHA), and combination methods, and the correlation between different methods was analyzed. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the significant influencing factors of the use of cement-reinforced screws.

Result

A total of 178 patients were enrolled in the study, aged 65.73 ​± ​14.43 years, 121 female, 57 male, Body Mass Index(BMI) was 22.88 ​± ​3.52, 57 (32.0%) used cement reinforced screws, and 14 (7.9%) had previous fracture history.The diagnostic rates of osteoporosis by DXA, HU, VBQ, NBHA and combination method were 22.5% (40/178), 47.2% (84/178), 56.2% (100/178), 64.0% (114/178) and 75.8% (135/178), respectively.HU, VBQ, NBHA, and combination methods were significantly different from DXA in the diagnosis rate of osteoporosis (P ​< ​0.001). Binary Logistics regression showed that age, T value, HU value, and VBQ value significantly influenced bone cement screw use, and the odds ratio of VBQ was 4.315. The prediction accuracy of the regression equation was 90.4%, the area under the receiver operator characteristic(ROC) curve was 0.974, and the Youden index was 0.830.

Conclusion

Currently, the DXA method widely used for diagnosing osteoporosis yields false negative results and there are significant discrepancies among different diagnostic methods. The combined approach exhibits a higher detection rate (75.8%). Age, T value, HU value, and VBQ value significantly influence the use of cement screws with a regression equation accuracy of 90.4%. Cement-reinforced screws are recommended when osteoporosis is determined by a combination method.

一种利用DXA、HU和VBQ评估骨质疏松的新方法
目的准确评估患者术前骨质疏松症,开发一种更准确的骨质疏松症评估方法,更好地指导骨水泥增强螺钉的使用。方法对上海同仁医院行腰椎后段减压融合内固定的患者进行回顾性分析,收集其一般资料、骨密度评估数据、骨折风险预测率(世界卫生组织骨折风险评估工具(FRAX))、是否使用水泥加固螺钉等资料。组合方法定义:T值​<;​−2.5或HU值​<;​110或VBQ>;3.5.比较双能x线骨密度仪(DXA)、Hounsfield单位(HU)、脊椎骨质量(VBQ)、国家骨健康联盟(NBHA)和联合方法对骨质疏松症的诊断率,并分析不同方法之间的相关性。采用二元逻辑回归分析了影响水泥加固螺钉使用的主要因素。结果共有178名患者参与研究,年龄65.73岁​±​14.43岁,121名女性,57名男性,体重指数(BMI)为22.88​±​3.52人,57人(32.0%)使用水泥增强螺钉,14人(7.9%)有骨折史。DXA、HU、VBQ、NBHA和联合方法对骨质疏松症的诊断率分别为22.5%(40/178)、47.2%(84/178)、56.2%(100/178)、64.0%(114/178)和75.8%(135/178)。HU、VBQ、NBHA及联合用药对骨质疏松症的诊断率与DXA有显著性差异(P​<;​0.001)。二元Logistics回归显示,年龄、T值、HU值和VBQ值显著影响骨水泥螺钉的使用,VBQ的比值比为4.315。回归方程的预测准确率为90.4%,受试者特征曲线下面积为0.974,Youden指数为0.830。结论目前,广泛用于诊断骨质疏松症的DXA方法产生假阴性结果,不同诊断方法之间存在显著差异。联合方法的检出率较高(75.8%)。年龄、T值、HU值和VBQ值对水泥螺钉的使用有显著影响,回归方程的准确率为90.4%。当用联合方法测定骨质疏松症时,建议使用水泥加固螺钉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信