Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery in tight reservoir rock using a two-step CO2 soaking strategy: Effects of fracture geometry

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Muhend Milad , Radzuan Junin , Akhmal Sidek , Abdulmohsin Imqam , Gamal A. Alusta , Agi Augustine , Muhanad A. Abdulazeez
{"title":"Experimental investigation of bypassed-oil recovery in tight reservoir rock using a two-step CO2 soaking strategy: Effects of fracture geometry","authors":"Muhend Milad ,&nbsp;Radzuan Junin ,&nbsp;Akhmal Sidek ,&nbsp;Abdulmohsin Imqam ,&nbsp;Gamal A. Alusta ,&nbsp;Agi Augustine ,&nbsp;Muhanad A. Abdulazeez","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2023.100093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The potential of the CO<sub>2</sub><span> soaking procedure has been generally acknowledged as a valid way to advance the tight rock oil recovery. Over the last decade, a significant number of Huff-n-Puff (H-n-P) experiments have been conducted to develop unconventional oil reservoirs. However, the majority of experiments used fully saturated cores and unconfined core holders. Therefore, the average oil recovery at the field-scale could not be accurately estimated. Besides, the effect of key factors such as fracture geometry on bypassed oil recovery has remained obscure. For better quantifying CO</span><sub>2</sub> H-n-P efficiency in oil fields, this study proposes an immiscible CO<sub>2</sub><span> soaking process aimed at bypassing the oil before conducting the H-n-P process using various fracture forms and dimensions. Tight cores from Sarawak with an average porosity and permeability of 9% and 0.07 md, respectively, were employed in this experimental research. The importance of the fracture surface areas (FSA), fracture depth (FD), width (FW), and diameter was thoroughly studied. The research findings revealed that the two-step CO</span><sub>2</sub><span> soaking procedure significantly reduces the effectiveness of the currently applied laboratory H-n-P process. However, the outcomes are more consistent with the current average oil recoveries in field pilots. The study demonstrates that FD is the most critical factor in maximizing the remaining oil recovery. The research indicates that the FSA does not always follow a specific trend. It is, however, dependent on the fracture geometry. The significance of the crack's surface area and fracture intensity is determined to be primarily dependent on the fracture shape and the utilized core holder system, respectively. The study's findings presented a higher degree of accuracy in estimating actual oil recovery from tight reservoirs employing two-step soaking technology.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260423000087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential of the CO2 soaking procedure has been generally acknowledged as a valid way to advance the tight rock oil recovery. Over the last decade, a significant number of Huff-n-Puff (H-n-P) experiments have been conducted to develop unconventional oil reservoirs. However, the majority of experiments used fully saturated cores and unconfined core holders. Therefore, the average oil recovery at the field-scale could not be accurately estimated. Besides, the effect of key factors such as fracture geometry on bypassed oil recovery has remained obscure. For better quantifying CO2 H-n-P efficiency in oil fields, this study proposes an immiscible CO2 soaking process aimed at bypassing the oil before conducting the H-n-P process using various fracture forms and dimensions. Tight cores from Sarawak with an average porosity and permeability of 9% and 0.07 md, respectively, were employed in this experimental research. The importance of the fracture surface areas (FSA), fracture depth (FD), width (FW), and diameter was thoroughly studied. The research findings revealed that the two-step CO2 soaking procedure significantly reduces the effectiveness of the currently applied laboratory H-n-P process. However, the outcomes are more consistent with the current average oil recoveries in field pilots. The study demonstrates that FD is the most critical factor in maximizing the remaining oil recovery. The research indicates that the FSA does not always follow a specific trend. It is, however, dependent on the fracture geometry. The significance of the crack's surface area and fracture intensity is determined to be primarily dependent on the fracture shape and the utilized core holder system, respectively. The study's findings presented a higher degree of accuracy in estimating actual oil recovery from tight reservoirs employing two-step soaking technology.

致密储层两步CO2浸泡策略旁通采油实验研究:裂缝几何形状的影响
CO2浸泡程序的潜力已被公认为推进致密岩油开采的有效途径。在过去的十年里,已经进行了大量的Huff-n-Puff(H-n-P)实验来开发非常规油藏。然而,大多数实验都使用了完全饱和的岩心和无限制的岩心支架。因此,无法准确估计油田规模的平均石油采收率。此外,裂缝几何形状等关键因素对旁路采油的影响仍然不清楚。为了更好地量化油田中的CO2 H-n-P效率,本研究提出了一种不混溶的CO2浸泡工艺,旨在使用各种裂缝形式和尺寸进行H-n-P工艺之前绕过石油。本实验研究采用砂拉越致密岩心,平均孔隙度和渗透率分别为9%和0.07md。深入研究了裂缝表面积(FSA)、裂缝深度(FD)、宽度(FW)和直径的重要性。研究结果表明,两步CO2浸泡程序显著降低了目前应用的实验室H-n-P工艺的有效性。然而,结果与目前油田试点的平均石油采收率更为一致。研究表明,FD是最大限度地提高剩余油采收率的最关键因素。研究表明,FSA并不总是遵循特定的趋势。然而,这取决于裂缝的几何形状。裂纹表面积和断裂强度的重要性被确定为主要取决于断裂形状和所使用的堆芯支架系统。该研究结果表明,采用两步浸泡技术估算致密油藏的实际采收率具有更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信