Discrepancies in the current capabilities in measuring upstream flare volumes in the Permian Basin

IF 2.6 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Anuradha Radhakrishnan , David DiCarlo , Raymond L. Orbach
{"title":"Discrepancies in the current capabilities in measuring upstream flare volumes in the Permian Basin","authors":"Anuradha Radhakrishnan ,&nbsp;David DiCarlo ,&nbsp;Raymond L. Orbach","doi":"10.1016/j.upstre.2022.100084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Permian Basin in Texas is the largest and fastest-growing oil and gas producing region in the United States. Along with this growth, there have been increased methane emissions and natural gas flaring. The volume of flared gas can be measured by various methods. In this study, flared gas volumes obtained from satellites are compared with the flared gas volume and oil production reported by the operators to the State of Texas. The novelty of this study arises from the fine-grained perspective with which it is conducted, that is, the data points are spatially narrowed down to ten different flare sites located in the Permian Basin and temporally narrowed down to monthly volume comparisons. It is found that satellite data matches reported data at some sites, while in other sites it is higher or lower than the operator-reported data. The trend in flaring is compared with oil production from the wells associated with the ten flare sites. At the sites where the data matched the gas flaring was also correlated with the oil production data. This suggests that the reported flare volumes are more accurate (i.e. match with the satellite) under routine flaring, and are less accurate for episodic flaring. Only five out of the ten flares showed a correlation with oil production. For the ten sites, cumulatively, the satellite observed volumes were 16% of the operator-reported volume in 2018, 21% in 2019, 41.5% in 2020, and 111% in 2021. A discussion is included on how changes in regulations may affect these comparisons going forward.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101264,"journal":{"name":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100084"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upstream Oil and Gas Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666260422000226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Permian Basin in Texas is the largest and fastest-growing oil and gas producing region in the United States. Along with this growth, there have been increased methane emissions and natural gas flaring. The volume of flared gas can be measured by various methods. In this study, flared gas volumes obtained from satellites are compared with the flared gas volume and oil production reported by the operators to the State of Texas. The novelty of this study arises from the fine-grained perspective with which it is conducted, that is, the data points are spatially narrowed down to ten different flare sites located in the Permian Basin and temporally narrowed down to monthly volume comparisons. It is found that satellite data matches reported data at some sites, while in other sites it is higher or lower than the operator-reported data. The trend in flaring is compared with oil production from the wells associated with the ten flare sites. At the sites where the data matched the gas flaring was also correlated with the oil production data. This suggests that the reported flare volumes are more accurate (i.e. match with the satellite) under routine flaring, and are less accurate for episodic flaring. Only five out of the ten flares showed a correlation with oil production. For the ten sites, cumulatively, the satellite observed volumes were 16% of the operator-reported volume in 2018, 21% in 2019, 41.5% in 2020, and 111% in 2021. A discussion is included on how changes in regulations may affect these comparisons going forward.

目前测量二叠纪盆地上游火炬量的能力存在差异
得克萨斯州的二叠纪盆地是美国最大、增长最快的石油和天然气生产区。随着这一增长,甲烷排放和天然气燃烧也在增加。燃烧气体的体积可以通过各种方法测量。在这项研究中,将从卫星获得的燃烧气体量与运营商向德克萨斯州报告的燃烧气体体积和石油产量进行了比较。这项研究的新颖性来自于其进行的细粒度视角,即数据点在空间上缩小到位于二叠纪盆地的十个不同的耀斑点,并在时间上缩小到每月的体积比较。研究发现,一些站点的卫星数据与报告的数据相匹配,而在其他站点,卫星数据高于或低于运营商报告的数据。将火炬燃烧的趋势与十个火炬点相关油井的石油产量进行比较。在数据与天然气燃烧相匹配的地点,天然气燃烧也与石油生产数据相关联。这表明,在常规燃烧下,报告的火炬体积更准确(即与卫星匹配),而在幕式燃烧时则不太准确。十次耀斑中只有五次显示出与石油产量有关。对于这十个站点,2018年卫星观测量累计为运营商报告量的16%,2019年为21%,2020年为41.5%,2021年为111%。还讨论了法规的变化如何影响这些比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信