Psychometric properties of the Psy-flex scale: A validation study in a community sample in Korea

IF 3.4 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Duckhyun Jo , Byeori Seong , Eunjoo Yang
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Psy-flex scale: A validation study in a community sample in Korea","authors":"Duckhyun Jo ,&nbsp;Byeori Seong ,&nbsp;Eunjoo Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined the psychometric<span> properties of the recently developed six-item Psy-Flex among community samples in Korea. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 1059 participants. Three bilingual experts translated the scale to ensure content validity. Factor analysis was employed to confirm the factor structure, and a polytomous item response theory model was used to examine the individual items and entire scale. The theory-based single-factor structure was confirmed using a Korean community sample, and measurement invariances were found across sex and age groups. In addition, the scale showed a moderate relationship with established measures of interest. Furthermore, item and categorical functioning were investigated using the polytomous Item Response Theory (IRT) model (i.e., the Generalized Partial Credit Model [GPCM]), identifying well-functioning (e.g., items 4, 5, and 6) and suboptimal (e.g., item 2) items. Additionally, the results suggest that the participants might not be able to meaningfully differentiate the original five-response categories. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to validate the Psy-Flex in Korea. We believe that the findings are of considerable value in facilitating our understanding of the scale and, more broadly, the construct of psychological flexibility.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","volume":"30 ","pages":"Pages 70-79"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144723001138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the psychometric properties of the recently developed six-item Psy-Flex among community samples in Korea. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 1059 participants. Three bilingual experts translated the scale to ensure content validity. Factor analysis was employed to confirm the factor structure, and a polytomous item response theory model was used to examine the individual items and entire scale. The theory-based single-factor structure was confirmed using a Korean community sample, and measurement invariances were found across sex and age groups. In addition, the scale showed a moderate relationship with established measures of interest. Furthermore, item and categorical functioning were investigated using the polytomous Item Response Theory (IRT) model (i.e., the Generalized Partial Credit Model [GPCM]), identifying well-functioning (e.g., items 4, 5, and 6) and suboptimal (e.g., item 2) items. Additionally, the results suggest that the participants might not be able to meaningfully differentiate the original five-response categories. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to validate the Psy-Flex in Korea. We believe that the findings are of considerable value in facilitating our understanding of the scale and, more broadly, the construct of psychological flexibility.

心理-flex量表的心理测量特性:韩国社区样本的验证研究
这项研究在韩国的社区样本中检验了最近开发的六项Psy Flex的心理测量特性。采用横断面设计,从1059名参与者中收集数据。三位双语专家翻译了量表,以确保内容的有效性。采用因子分析法确定因子结构,并采用多元项目反应理论模型对单项和整体量表进行检验。使用韩国社区样本证实了基于理论的单因素结构,并发现了性别和年龄组之间的测量不变量。此外,该量表显示出与既定的感兴趣指标之间的适度关系。此外,使用多元项目反应理论(IRT)模型(即广义部分信用模型[GPCM])对项目和分类功能进行了研究,确定了功能良好(例如项目4、5和6)和次优(例如项目2)的项目。此外,研究结果表明,参与者可能无法有意义地区分最初的五种反应类别。据我们所知,这是在韩国首次尝试验证Psy Flex。我们相信,这些发现对促进我们理解心理灵活性的规模,以及更广泛地理解心理灵活性结构具有相当大的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
18.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science is the official journal of the Association for Contextual Behavioral Science (ACBS). Contextual Behavioral Science is a systematic and pragmatic approach to the understanding of behavior, the solution of human problems, and the promotion of human growth and development. Contextual Behavioral Science uses functional principles and theories to analyze and modify action embedded in its historical and situational context. The goal is to predict and influence behavior, with precision, scope, and depth, across all behavioral domains and all levels of analysis, so as to help create a behavioral science that is more adequate to the challenge of the human condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信