The institutional impact of research challenges and constraints on psychology and other social and behavioral sciences

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
David M. Sanbonmatsu , E. Hanna Cooley , Steven S. Posavac
{"title":"The institutional impact of research challenges and constraints on psychology and other social and behavioral sciences","authors":"David M. Sanbonmatsu , E. Hanna Cooley , Steven S. Posavac","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2023.101014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":51556,"journal":{"name":"New Ideas in Psychology","volume":"70 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Ideas in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X23000077","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
研究对心理学和其他社会和行为科学的挑战和制约的制度影响
心理学和其他社会和行为学科受到研究现象异常复杂以及众多法律、伦理和后勤限制的严重限制。在这篇文章中,我们考察了这些研究挑战对我们学科的制度地位和支持的影响。人类研究的巨大挑战导致了对社会和行为科学家能力的不利刻板印象,并助长了对我们领域的自我谴责。对研究问题、框架和方法的共识不足,以及对研究局限性的失望,导致社会学和人类学等学科支离破碎。众多的障碍和障碍导致了社会科学和行为科学的从属地位,这种从属地位通过有利于自然科学的政策、实践、意识形态和刻板印象得以维持。心理学家和其他社会和行为科学家需要认识到研究现象的复杂性给他们的研究事业带来的局限性,并停止贬低他们的工作。此外,他们需要认识到冲突和分裂的可能性,因为我们领域的共识很低,并采取集体行动促进社会和行为科学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: New Ideas in Psychology is a journal for theoretical psychology in its broadest sense. We are looking for new and seminal ideas, from within Psychology and from other fields that have something to bring to Psychology. We welcome presentations and criticisms of theory, of background metaphysics, and of fundamental issues of method, both empirical and conceptual. We put special emphasis on the need for informed discussion of psychological theories to be interdisciplinary. Empirical papers are accepted at New Ideas in Psychology, but only as long as they focus on conceptual issues and are theoretically creative. We are also open to comments or debate, interviews, and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信