A computational model to assess the effectiveness of adhesive materials in restoration of crown-root fractures

Amandeep Kaur , Shubham Gupta , Nitesh Tewari , Arnab Chanda
{"title":"A computational model to assess the effectiveness of adhesive materials in restoration of crown-root fractures","authors":"Amandeep Kaur ,&nbsp;Shubham Gupta ,&nbsp;Nitesh Tewari ,&nbsp;Arnab Chanda","doi":"10.1016/j.bmt.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fragment reattachment for crown root fractures has become a routinely employed treatment modality with the advancements in adhesive dentistry. Among the majority of documented dental trauma cases, this specific fracture type is one of the most prevalent and difficult fracture kinds. Due to its complexity, these fracture kinds are often not computationally modelled. Moreover, there is a lack of literature to understand the effect of different adhesive materials, used to re-attach this particular fracture, on traumatic injuries. In our work, 3D models of the permanent maxillary central incisor tooth were developed using cone beam computed tomography image of a patient. This model was systematically modified to represent a prominent crown root fracture and subsequently re-attached computationally using three different adhesives. A biting force and a traumatic load were applied, and the induced stresses were studied across the healthy and treated tooth models and compared for three different adhesives used for re-attachment of fractured fragments. Tooth reattached with resin adhesive performed better in all the loading conditions that were considered in the study as compared to flowable composite and resin cement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100180,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Technology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949723X23000545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fragment reattachment for crown root fractures has become a routinely employed treatment modality with the advancements in adhesive dentistry. Among the majority of documented dental trauma cases, this specific fracture type is one of the most prevalent and difficult fracture kinds. Due to its complexity, these fracture kinds are often not computationally modelled. Moreover, there is a lack of literature to understand the effect of different adhesive materials, used to re-attach this particular fracture, on traumatic injuries. In our work, 3D models of the permanent maxillary central incisor tooth were developed using cone beam computed tomography image of a patient. This model was systematically modified to represent a prominent crown root fracture and subsequently re-attached computationally using three different adhesives. A biting force and a traumatic load were applied, and the induced stresses were studied across the healthy and treated tooth models and compared for three different adhesives used for re-attachment of fractured fragments. Tooth reattached with resin adhesive performed better in all the loading conditions that were considered in the study as compared to flowable composite and resin cement.

一种评估粘接材料在冠根骨折修复中的有效性的计算模型
随着粘接牙科的发展,牙冠根骨折的碎片复位已成为一种常规治疗方式。在大多数记录在案的牙科创伤病例中,这种特定的骨折类型是最常见和最困难的骨折类型之一。由于其复杂性,这些裂缝类型通常不会进行计算建模。此外,缺乏文献来了解用于重新固定这种特殊骨折的不同粘合材料对创伤的影响。在我们的工作中,使用患者的锥形束计算机断层扫描图像开发了上颌中切牙的3D模型。该模型被系统地修改以表示突出的牙冠根部骨折,随后使用三种不同的粘合剂进行计算重新连接。施加咬合力和创伤载荷,研究了健康和治疗过的牙齿模型的诱导应力,并比较了用于重新附着骨折碎片的三种不同粘合剂。与可流动复合材料和树脂水泥相比,用树脂粘合剂重新附着的牙齿在研究中考虑的所有负载条件下表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信