Carbon is to life as g is to _____: A review of the contributions to the special issue on specific abilities in intelligence

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Thomas R. Coyle , Samuel Greiff
{"title":"Carbon is to life as g is to _____: A review of the contributions to the special issue on specific abilities in intelligence","authors":"Thomas R. Coyle ,&nbsp;Samuel Greiff","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2023.101786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Just as carbon infuses all life forms, <em>g</em> infuses almost all aspects of cognitive performance. This Special Issue focuses on specific abilities, defined as distinct abilities (e.g., verbal, math, spatial) that differ conceptually and empirically from <em>g</em>, which refers to variance common to tests. The nine contributions examine different specific abilities (e.g., spatial, academic, executive), involve different samples (e.g., humans, animals, countries), and compare different groups (e.g., males and females; gifted and nongifted). The contributions are discussed in terms of their support for a “primacy of <em>g</em> hypothesis,” which assumes that the validity of tests is largely attributable to <em>g</em>, or a “more than <em>g</em> hypothesis,” which assumes that specific abilities contribute to the validity of tests beyond <em>g</em>. The article summarizes each contribution and discusses models and theories of <em>g</em> and specific abilities (e.g., Cattell-Horn-Carroll and Verbal-Perceptual-Image Rotation models; investment and differentiation theories), with a focus on future research on specific abilities. Taken together, the contributions show that specific abilities are a meaningful addition to <em>g</em> but that their validity depends on the particular abilities, models, and theories being examined.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289623000673","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Just as carbon infuses all life forms, g infuses almost all aspects of cognitive performance. This Special Issue focuses on specific abilities, defined as distinct abilities (e.g., verbal, math, spatial) that differ conceptually and empirically from g, which refers to variance common to tests. The nine contributions examine different specific abilities (e.g., spatial, academic, executive), involve different samples (e.g., humans, animals, countries), and compare different groups (e.g., males and females; gifted and nongifted). The contributions are discussed in terms of their support for a “primacy of g hypothesis,” which assumes that the validity of tests is largely attributable to g, or a “more than g hypothesis,” which assumes that specific abilities contribute to the validity of tests beyond g. The article summarizes each contribution and discusses models and theories of g and specific abilities (e.g., Cattell-Horn-Carroll and Verbal-Perceptual-Image Rotation models; investment and differentiation theories), with a focus on future research on specific abilities. Taken together, the contributions show that specific abilities are a meaningful addition to g but that their validity depends on the particular abilities, models, and theories being examined.

碳之于生命就像g之于_____:对智力特殊能力特刊的评论
就像碳注入所有生命形式一样,g几乎注入认知表现的所有方面。本期特刊关注特定能力,定义为不同的能力(如语言、数学、空间),在概念和经验上与g不同,g指的是测试中常见的方差。这九项贡献考察了不同的特定能力(例如,空间、学术、执行),涉及不同的样本(例如,人类、动物、国家),并比较了不同的群体(例如,男性和女性;天赋异禀和非天赋异禀)。这些贡献是根据他们对“g的首要性假设”的支持来讨论的,该假设假设测试的有效性在很大程度上归因于g,或者“大于g的假设”,该假设假定特定能力有助于超过g的测试有效性。本文总结了每一项贡献,并讨论了g和特定能力的模型和理论(如Cattell Horn-Carroll和Verbal Perceptual Image Rotation模型;投资和差异化理论),重点是未来对特定能力的研究。总之,这些贡献表明,特定能力是g的一个有意义的补充,但它们的有效性取决于所考察的特定能力、模型和理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信