Regional household variation and inequality across the Maya landscape

IF 2 1区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Whittaker Schroder , Timothy Murtha , Charles Golden , Madeline Brown , Robert Griffin , Kelsey E. Herndon , Shanti Morell-Hart , Andrew K. Scherer
{"title":"Regional household variation and inequality across the Maya landscape","authors":"Whittaker Schroder ,&nbsp;Timothy Murtha ,&nbsp;Charles Golden ,&nbsp;Madeline Brown ,&nbsp;Robert Griffin ,&nbsp;Kelsey E. Herndon ,&nbsp;Shanti Morell-Hart ,&nbsp;Andrew K. Scherer","doi":"10.1016/j.jaa.2023.101552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The emergence and expansion of inequality have been topics of household archaeology for decades. Traditionally, this question has been informed by ethnographic, ethnohistoric and/or comparative studies. Within sites and regions, comparative physical, spatial, and architectural studies of households offer an important baseline of information about status, wealth, and well-being, especially in the Maya lowlands where households are accessible in the archaeological record. Between sites, more research is necessary to assess how these physical measurements of household remains compare. This paper investigates the intersection of landscape, household, and community based on a multi-scalar analysis of households using the Gini index across southeastern Mexico, in the context of a broader study of land use, land management, and settlement patterns. Notably, this paper represents a region-wide analysis of nearly continuous LiDAR data within and outside of previously documented prehispanic Maya settlements. While we conclude that the Gini index is useful for establishing a comparative understanding of settlement, we also recognize that the index is a starting point to identify other ways to study how household to community-level social and economic variability intersects with diverse ecological patterns. Highlighting the opportunities and limitations with applying measures like the Gini index across culturally, temporally, and geographically heterogeneous areas, we illustrate how systematic studies of settlement can be coupled to broader studies of landscape archaeology to interpret changing patterns of land management and settlement across the Maya lowlands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 101552"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anthropological Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278416523000685","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence and expansion of inequality have been topics of household archaeology for decades. Traditionally, this question has been informed by ethnographic, ethnohistoric and/or comparative studies. Within sites and regions, comparative physical, spatial, and architectural studies of households offer an important baseline of information about status, wealth, and well-being, especially in the Maya lowlands where households are accessible in the archaeological record. Between sites, more research is necessary to assess how these physical measurements of household remains compare. This paper investigates the intersection of landscape, household, and community based on a multi-scalar analysis of households using the Gini index across southeastern Mexico, in the context of a broader study of land use, land management, and settlement patterns. Notably, this paper represents a region-wide analysis of nearly continuous LiDAR data within and outside of previously documented prehispanic Maya settlements. While we conclude that the Gini index is useful for establishing a comparative understanding of settlement, we also recognize that the index is a starting point to identify other ways to study how household to community-level social and economic variability intersects with diverse ecological patterns. Highlighting the opportunities and limitations with applying measures like the Gini index across culturally, temporally, and geographically heterogeneous areas, we illustrate how systematic studies of settlement can be coupled to broader studies of landscape archaeology to interpret changing patterns of land management and settlement across the Maya lowlands.

玛雅地区的家庭差异和不平等
几十年来,不平等现象的出现和扩大一直是家庭考古的主题。传统上,这个问题是由民族志、民族历史和/或比较研究提出的。在遗址和地区内,对家庭的比较物理、空间和建筑研究提供了关于地位、财富和福祉的重要信息基线,尤其是在玛雅低地,考古记录中可以找到家庭。在不同的地点之间,有必要进行更多的研究,以评估这些家庭遗骸的物理测量结果的比较情况。本文在对土地利用、土地管理和定居模式进行更广泛研究的背景下,使用基尼指数对墨西哥东南部的家庭进行多标量分析,调查了景观、家庭和社区的交叉点。值得注意的是,本文对先前记录的史前玛雅定居点内外几乎连续的激光雷达数据进行了全区域分析。虽然我们得出的结论是,基尼指数有助于建立对定居的比较理解,但我们也认识到,该指数是确定其他方法的起点,以研究家庭到社区层面的社会和经济变异性如何与不同的生态模式相交。我们强调了在文化、时间和地理异质性地区应用基尼指数等指标的机会和局限性,说明了如何将定居的系统研究与更广泛的景观考古研究相结合,以解释玛雅低地土地管理和定居模式的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: An innovative, international publication, the Journal of Anthropological Archaeology is devoted to the development of theory and, in a broad sense, methodology for the systematic and rigorous understanding of the organization, operation, and evolution of human societies. The discipline served by the journal is characterized by its goals and approach, not by geographical or temporal bounds. The data utilized or treated range from the earliest archaeological evidence for the emergence of human culture to historically documented societies and the contemporary observations of the ethnographer, ethnoarchaeologist, sociologist, or geographer. These subjects appear in the journal as examples of cultural organization, operation, and evolution, not as specific historical phenomena.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信