Stability and change of religiosity among baby boomers in adulthood: Associations with familism over time

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 Medicine
Woosang Hwang , Kent Jason Cheng , Maria T. Brown , Merril Silverstein
{"title":"Stability and change of religiosity among baby boomers in adulthood: Associations with familism over time","authors":"Woosang Hwang ,&nbsp;Kent Jason Cheng ,&nbsp;Maria T. Brown ,&nbsp;Merril Silverstein","doi":"10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>While it is commonly understood that familism<span> is influenced by religiosity, less is known about how religiosity between young adulthood and midlife is related to the trajectory of familism from midlife over the later life course. In this study, we identified a multidimensional typology of religiosity among baby boomers in young adulthood and midlife, explored how membership in this religious typology changed from young adulthood to midlife, and examined how transition patterns of religiosity were associated with familism over time. We used data from a sample of 471 baby boomers (mean age 19 years in 1971) from the </span></span>Longitudinal Study<span> of Generations (LSOG), Wave-1 (1971) through Wave-8 (2005). Using latent class and latent transition analysis, we identified three latent religiosity classes in Wave-1 (1971) and Wave-3 (1988): </span></span><em>strongly religious</em>, <em>weakly religious</em>, and <em>privately religious</em><span>, and identified nine transition patterns of religiosity from you between these waves from young adulthood to midlife. Using latent growth curve analysis (Wave-3 to Wave-8), we found that respondents who remained strongly or privately religious or whose religiosity increased had higher initial levels of familism (Wave-3) compared to those who stayed in the weakly religious class. However, the gap in familism across religiosity transition patterns decreased over time up to late middle age. Our findings indicate that while religiosity was positively associated with familism, its impact weakened over time possibly due to change in the centrality of family life and societal factors.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47126,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Life Course Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Life Course Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260823000175","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While it is commonly understood that familism is influenced by religiosity, less is known about how religiosity between young adulthood and midlife is related to the trajectory of familism from midlife over the later life course. In this study, we identified a multidimensional typology of religiosity among baby boomers in young adulthood and midlife, explored how membership in this religious typology changed from young adulthood to midlife, and examined how transition patterns of religiosity were associated with familism over time. We used data from a sample of 471 baby boomers (mean age 19 years in 1971) from the Longitudinal Study of Generations (LSOG), Wave-1 (1971) through Wave-8 (2005). Using latent class and latent transition analysis, we identified three latent religiosity classes in Wave-1 (1971) and Wave-3 (1988): strongly religious, weakly religious, and privately religious, and identified nine transition patterns of religiosity from you between these waves from young adulthood to midlife. Using latent growth curve analysis (Wave-3 to Wave-8), we found that respondents who remained strongly or privately religious or whose religiosity increased had higher initial levels of familism (Wave-3) compared to those who stayed in the weakly religious class. However, the gap in familism across religiosity transition patterns decreased over time up to late middle age. Our findings indicate that while religiosity was positively associated with familism, its impact weakened over time possibly due to change in the centrality of family life and societal factors.

婴儿潮一代成年后宗教信仰的稳定性和变化:与家庭主义的关系
虽然人们普遍认为家庭主义受到宗教信仰的影响,但人们对年轻人和中年人之间的宗教信仰如何与家庭主义从中年到晚年的轨迹相关知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们确定了婴儿潮一代在青年和中年的宗教信仰的多维类型,探讨了这种宗教类型的成员从青年到中年的变化,并研究了宗教信仰的转变模式如何随着时间的推移与家庭主义相关联。我们使用了471名婴儿潮一代(1971年平均年龄19岁)的样本数据,这些数据来自世代纵向研究(LSOG),第1波(1971年)至第8波(2005年)。使用潜在类别和潜在转变分析,我们在Wave-1(1971)和Wave-3(1988)中确定了三个潜在的宗教信仰类别:强宗教、弱宗教和私人宗教,并确定了从年轻到中年的这些浪潮之间宗教信仰的九种转变模式。使用潜在增长曲线分析(Wave-3至Wave-8),我们发现,与那些留在弱宗教阶层的受访者相比,那些保持强烈或私下宗教信仰或宗教信仰增加的受访者的家庭主义初始水平(Wave3)更高。然而,随着时间的推移,直到中年晚期,宗教转变模式中的家庭主义差距逐渐缩小。我们的研究结果表明,虽然宗教信仰与家庭主义呈正相关,但其影响随着时间的推移而减弱,这可能是由于家庭生活中心和社会因素的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Life Course Research
Advances in Life Course Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Advances in Life Course Research publishes articles dealing with various aspects of the human life course. Seeing life course research as an essentially interdisciplinary field of study, it invites and welcomes contributions from anthropology, biosocial science, demography, epidemiology and statistics, gerontology, economics, management and organisation science, policy studies, psychology, research methodology and sociology. Original empirical analyses, theoretical contributions, methodological studies and reviews accessible to a broad set of readers are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信