Scientometric review: Concentration and toxicity assessment in environmental non-targeted LC/HRMS analysis

IF 11.1 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Helen Sepman , Louise Malm , Pilleriin Peets , Anneli Kruve
{"title":"Scientometric review: Concentration and toxicity assessment in environmental non-targeted LC/HRMS analysis","authors":"Helen Sepman ,&nbsp;Louise Malm ,&nbsp;Pilleriin Peets ,&nbsp;Anneli Kruve","doi":"10.1016/j.teac.2023.e00217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Non-targeted screening with LC/HRMS is a go-to approach to discover relevant contaminants in environmental water samples that contain an abundance of chemicals. The rapidly increasing popularity of non-targeted LC/HRMS screening has initiated development of a diverse set of methods for assessing the concentration and toxicity of the detected chemicals. This review aims to benchmark the trends in the environmental NTS literature with particular focus on (1) methods used for the quantification of tentatively identified chemicals that lack analytical standards, (2) methods for assessing the toxicity of detected chemicals, and (3) methods combining the former into a risk evaluation. Here we provide a scientometric review of these strategies based on the Web of Science referenced papers published between 2019 and 2022. General trends show that quantification and toxicity assessments are widely employed in NTS, reaching 66 % and 45 % over four years, respectively. Simultaneously, only 13 % of the papers covered here combine these results into a risk factor or similar. With this review we aim to highlight the advantages and gaps in the approaches used for concentration and toxicity assessment and provide guidelines for more homogeneous data interrogation and extrapolation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56032,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214158823000235","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-targeted screening with LC/HRMS is a go-to approach to discover relevant contaminants in environmental water samples that contain an abundance of chemicals. The rapidly increasing popularity of non-targeted LC/HRMS screening has initiated development of a diverse set of methods for assessing the concentration and toxicity of the detected chemicals. This review aims to benchmark the trends in the environmental NTS literature with particular focus on (1) methods used for the quantification of tentatively identified chemicals that lack analytical standards, (2) methods for assessing the toxicity of detected chemicals, and (3) methods combining the former into a risk evaluation. Here we provide a scientometric review of these strategies based on the Web of Science referenced papers published between 2019 and 2022. General trends show that quantification and toxicity assessments are widely employed in NTS, reaching 66 % and 45 % over four years, respectively. Simultaneously, only 13 % of the papers covered here combine these results into a risk factor or similar. With this review we aim to highlight the advantages and gaps in the approaches used for concentration and toxicity assessment and provide guidelines for more homogeneous data interrogation and extrapolation.

Abstract Image

科学计量学综述:环境非靶向LC/HRMS分析中的浓度和毒性评价
LC/HRMS的非靶向筛选是一种在含有大量化学物质的环境水样中发现相关污染物的方法。非靶向LC/HRMS筛查的迅速普及,启动了一套评估检测化学品浓度和毒性的多样化方法的开发。本综述旨在衡量环境NTS文献中的趋势,特别关注(1)用于量化缺乏分析标准的暂定化学品的方法,(2)评估检测化学品毒性的方法,以及(3)将前者结合到风险评估中的方法。在这里,我们根据2019年至2022年间发表的科学网参考论文,对这些策略进行了科学计量学综述。总体趋势表明,定量和毒性评估在NTS中得到了广泛应用,在四年内分别达到66%和45%。同时,只有13%的论文将这些结果结合成一个风险因素或类似因素。通过这篇综述,我们旨在强调用于浓度和毒性评估的方法的优势和差距,并为更同质的数据询问和推断提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry
Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry Chemistry-Analytical Chemistry
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry is an authoritative journal that focuses on the dynamic field of environmental analytical chemistry. It aims to deliver concise yet insightful overviews of the latest advancements in this field. By acquiring high-quality chemical data and effectively interpreting it, we can deepen our understanding of the environment. TrEAC is committed to keeping up with the fast-paced nature of environmental analytical chemistry by providing timely coverage of innovative analytical methods used in studying environmentally relevant substances and addressing related issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信