Conceptualising risk communication barriers to household flood preparedness

Willow Forsyth , Tim Roberts , Graham Brewer
{"title":"Conceptualising risk communication barriers to household flood preparedness","authors":"Willow Forsyth ,&nbsp;Tim Roberts ,&nbsp;Graham Brewer","doi":"10.1016/j.ugj.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accelerating flood risk is outstripping household preparedness, leading to higher costs when disasters occur. This has profound implications for the governance of urban areas on and around floodplains which often hold most of the responsibility for managing this risk. Effective community-wide flood preparedness strongly depends on human behaviour patterns before (yet-to-be experienced or imagined) unprecedented events. Whilst education is an accepted approach to changing human behaviour patterns, risk communications have not succeeded in prompting preparedness. We provide a systematic review using Steg &amp; Vlek's extended General Framework because it describes the four key issues that, unless addressed, can impede risk communications’ ability to promote behaviour change.</p><p>The results suggest current research and practice gaps remain in what behaviour is targeted, what is communicated, how it is communicated, and what is learnt from evaluating education campaigns. A predominant focus of ‘get ready’ flood lists on response rather than anticipatory preparedness items may decrease their relevance for households. Education campaigns may fail to change relevant preparedness behaviours because they are perceived as irrelevant, not attuned to households’ important beliefs or agency, employ counter-productive messaging strategies, or fail to meet best practices for communicating actionable risk. Effective education messaging might well depend on co-production of local contextualised content between emergency agencies and households.</p><p>It is a clear finding of this review that current research and practice is highly limited by scholarships’ theoretical and methodological issues. We argue addressing scholarship gaps can inform urban governance arrangements, and thereby better support efforts to foster household and community flood preparedness. This will have inordinate value for emergency agencies, often tasked with preparedness-through-education, and the communities they serve.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101266,"journal":{"name":"Urban Governance","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 116-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266432862300027X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Accelerating flood risk is outstripping household preparedness, leading to higher costs when disasters occur. This has profound implications for the governance of urban areas on and around floodplains which often hold most of the responsibility for managing this risk. Effective community-wide flood preparedness strongly depends on human behaviour patterns before (yet-to-be experienced or imagined) unprecedented events. Whilst education is an accepted approach to changing human behaviour patterns, risk communications have not succeeded in prompting preparedness. We provide a systematic review using Steg & Vlek's extended General Framework because it describes the four key issues that, unless addressed, can impede risk communications’ ability to promote behaviour change.

The results suggest current research and practice gaps remain in what behaviour is targeted, what is communicated, how it is communicated, and what is learnt from evaluating education campaigns. A predominant focus of ‘get ready’ flood lists on response rather than anticipatory preparedness items may decrease their relevance for households. Education campaigns may fail to change relevant preparedness behaviours because they are perceived as irrelevant, not attuned to households’ important beliefs or agency, employ counter-productive messaging strategies, or fail to meet best practices for communicating actionable risk. Effective education messaging might well depend on co-production of local contextualised content between emergency agencies and households.

It is a clear finding of this review that current research and practice is highly limited by scholarships’ theoretical and methodological issues. We argue addressing scholarship gaps can inform urban governance arrangements, and thereby better support efforts to foster household and community flood preparedness. This will have inordinate value for emergency agencies, often tasked with preparedness-through-education, and the communities they serve.

概念化家庭防洪风险沟通障碍
加速的洪水风险超过了家庭的准备,导致灾难发生时成本更高。这对洪泛平原及其周围城市地区的治理有着深远的影响,而洪泛平原往往承担着管理这种风险的大部分责任。有效的社区防洪在很大程度上取决于前所未有的事件之前(尚未经历或想象)的人类行为模式。虽然教育是改变人类行为模式的一种公认方法,但风险沟通并没有成功地促使人们做好准备。我们使用Steg&;Vlek扩展了通用框架,因为它描述了四个关键问题,除非得到解决,否则可能会阻碍风险沟通促进行为改变的能力。研究结果表明,目前的研究和实践在针对什么行为、传达什么、如何传达以及从评估教育活动中学到什么方面仍然存在差距。“做好准备”洪水清单的主要重点是应对,而不是预期的准备项目,这可能会降低其对家庭的相关性。教育运动可能无法改变相关的准备行为,因为它们被认为是无关紧要的,不符合家庭的重要信仰或机构,采用了适得其反的信息传递策略,或者未能达到传达可操作风险的最佳实践。有效的教育信息很可能取决于应急机构和家庭之间对当地背景内容的共同制作。这篇综述清楚地发现,当前的研究和实践在很大程度上受到奖学金的理论和方法问题的限制。我们认为,解决奖学金缺口可以为城市治理安排提供信息,从而更好地支持促进家庭和社区防洪的努力。这对通常负责通过教育做好准备的应急机构及其服务的社区来说将具有巨大的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信