María Vargas-Hernandez , Miguel Aguilar-Schotborgh , José Rojas-Suarez , Sandra Contreras-Arrieta , Liseth García-Uribe , Wilfrido Coronell-Rodriguez , Carmelo Dueñas-Castell
{"title":"C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in critical care settings","authors":"María Vargas-Hernandez , Miguel Aguilar-Schotborgh , José Rojas-Suarez , Sandra Contreras-Arrieta , Liseth García-Uribe , Wilfrido Coronell-Rodriguez , Carmelo Dueñas-Castell","doi":"10.1016/j.acci.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Compare the performance of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) in predicting in-hospital death between patients with and without COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This prospective cohort study included critically ill patients with and without COVID-19. CAR was obtained at admission and on Day 3, along with fluid balance and other predictive scores. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital death, and the Youden index was used to determine CAR cut-off points.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included the data of 176 patients; 85 had COVID-19. All-cause in-hospital death was 31.3%. The CAR cut-off points for patients without COVID-19 were 28.5<!--> <!-->mg/g and 31.6<!--> <!-->mg/g at admission and on Day 3, respectively, and 13.5<!--> <!-->mg/g and 7.4<!--> <!-->mg/g for COVID-19 patients. Day 3 CAR was a better predictor of all-cause in-hospital death than CAR at admission in both groups. Non-survivors in the COVID and non-COVID groups had higher positive fluid balance rates than survivors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CAR predicted in-hospital death in both groups, with different cut-off points. CAR on Day 3 had better diagnostic performance than that at admission. Cumulative fluid balance may influence CAR kinetics. An optimal CAR cut-off point for critically ill patients, optimal measuring time, and impact of fluids therapy still need to be established.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100016,"journal":{"name":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","volume":"23 3","pages":"Pages 255-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0122726223000319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Compare the performance of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) in predicting in-hospital death between patients with and without COVID-19.
Materials and methods
This prospective cohort study included critically ill patients with and without COVID-19. CAR was obtained at admission and on Day 3, along with fluid balance and other predictive scores. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital death, and the Youden index was used to determine CAR cut-off points.
Results
We included the data of 176 patients; 85 had COVID-19. All-cause in-hospital death was 31.3%. The CAR cut-off points for patients without COVID-19 were 28.5 mg/g and 31.6 mg/g at admission and on Day 3, respectively, and 13.5 mg/g and 7.4 mg/g for COVID-19 patients. Day 3 CAR was a better predictor of all-cause in-hospital death than CAR at admission in both groups. Non-survivors in the COVID and non-COVID groups had higher positive fluid balance rates than survivors.
Conclusions
The CAR predicted in-hospital death in both groups, with different cut-off points. CAR on Day 3 had better diagnostic performance than that at admission. Cumulative fluid balance may influence CAR kinetics. An optimal CAR cut-off point for critically ill patients, optimal measuring time, and impact of fluids therapy still need to be established.