C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in critical care settings

María Vargas-Hernandez , Miguel Aguilar-Schotborgh , José Rojas-Suarez , Sandra Contreras-Arrieta , Liseth García-Uribe , Wilfrido Coronell-Rodriguez , Carmelo Dueñas-Castell
{"title":"C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in critical care settings","authors":"María Vargas-Hernandez ,&nbsp;Miguel Aguilar-Schotborgh ,&nbsp;José Rojas-Suarez ,&nbsp;Sandra Contreras-Arrieta ,&nbsp;Liseth García-Uribe ,&nbsp;Wilfrido Coronell-Rodriguez ,&nbsp;Carmelo Dueñas-Castell","doi":"10.1016/j.acci.2023.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Compare the performance of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) in predicting in-hospital death between patients with and without COVID-19.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This prospective cohort study included critically ill patients with and without COVID-19. CAR was obtained at admission and on Day 3, along with fluid balance and other predictive scores. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital death, and the Youden index was used to determine CAR cut-off points.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included the data of 176 patients; 85 had COVID-19. All-cause in-hospital death was 31.3%. The CAR cut-off points for patients without COVID-19 were 28.5<!--> <!-->mg/g and 31.6<!--> <!-->mg/g at admission and on Day 3, respectively, and 13.5<!--> <!-->mg/g and 7.4<!--> <!-->mg/g for COVID-19 patients. Day 3 CAR was a better predictor of all-cause in-hospital death than CAR at admission in both groups. Non-survivors in the COVID and non-COVID groups had higher positive fluid balance rates than survivors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The CAR predicted in-hospital death in both groups, with different cut-off points. CAR on Day 3 had better diagnostic performance than that at admission. Cumulative fluid balance may influence CAR kinetics. An optimal CAR cut-off point for critically ill patients, optimal measuring time, and impact of fluids therapy still need to be established.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100016,"journal":{"name":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","volume":"23 3","pages":"Pages 255-266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Colombiana de Cuidado Intensivo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0122726223000319","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Compare the performance of the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) in predicting in-hospital death between patients with and without COVID-19.

Materials and methods

This prospective cohort study included critically ill patients with and without COVID-19. CAR was obtained at admission and on Day 3, along with fluid balance and other predictive scores. The primary outcome was all-cause in-hospital death, and the Youden index was used to determine CAR cut-off points.

Results

We included the data of 176 patients; 85 had COVID-19. All-cause in-hospital death was 31.3%. The CAR cut-off points for patients without COVID-19 were 28.5 mg/g and 31.6 mg/g at admission and on Day 3, respectively, and 13.5 mg/g and 7.4 mg/g for COVID-19 patients. Day 3 CAR was a better predictor of all-cause in-hospital death than CAR at admission in both groups. Non-survivors in the COVID and non-COVID groups had higher positive fluid balance rates than survivors.

Conclusions

The CAR predicted in-hospital death in both groups, with different cut-off points. CAR on Day 3 had better diagnostic performance than that at admission. Cumulative fluid balance may influence CAR kinetics. An optimal CAR cut-off point for critically ill patients, optimal measuring time, and impact of fluids therapy still need to be established.

c反应蛋白与白蛋白在重症监护环境中的比值
目的比较C-反应蛋白与白蛋白比值(CAR)在预测有无新冠肺炎患者住院死亡中的作用。材料和方法本前瞻性队列研究包括有无新冠肺炎的危重患者。在入院时和第3天获得CAR,以及流体平衡和其他预测分数。主要结果是全因住院死亡,Youden指数用于确定CAR临界点。结果纳入176例患者资料;85人患有新冠肺炎。所有原因的住院死亡为31.3%。无新冠肺炎患者入院时和第3天的CAR截止点分别为28.5 mg/g和31.6 mg/g,新冠肺炎患者为13.5 mg/g和7.4 mg/g。在两组患者中,第3天的CAR比入院时的CAR更能预测全因住院死亡。新冠肺炎和非新冠肺炎组的非幸存者的液体平衡阳性率高于幸存者。结论CAR可预测两组患者的住院死亡,其临界点不同。CAR在第3天的诊断表现优于入院时。累积流体平衡可能影响CAR动力学。危重患者的最佳CAR截止点、最佳测量时间和液体治疗的影响仍需确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信